<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Go to the Web, young journalist!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ojr.org/060316moor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ojr.org/060316moor/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=060316moor</link>
	<description>Focusing on the future of digital journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:43:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristen Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/060316moor/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristen Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1050#comment-574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with Mr. Moor to a certain extent. I am an aspiring journalist -- more specifically an aspiring copy editor -- and I worry about the same topics he touched on in his article. But I couldn&#039;t help but feel like the distant subject of this piece. I thought about reporters and editors more than I thought about copy editors and designers when I read through his opinion. Maybe denial is just setting in.

One thing I have noticed through internships and my experience as the copy chief at our student newspaper is the how the duties of a copy editor are bridging more and more into the online world. How can I as a copy editor better prepare myself for this reality? I wonder how prepared anyone can be for the World Wide Web considering it changes many times within just one day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Mr. Moor to a certain extent. I am an aspiring journalist &#8212; more specifically an aspiring copy editor &#8212; and I worry about the same topics he touched on in his article. But I couldn&#8217;t help but feel like the distant subject of this piece. I thought about reporters and editors more than I thought about copy editors and designers when I read through his opinion. Maybe denial is just setting in.</p>
<p>One thing I have noticed through internships and my experience as the copy chief at our student newspaper is the how the duties of a copy editor are bridging more and more into the online world. How can I as a copy editor better prepare myself for this reality? I wonder how prepared anyone can be for the World Wide Web considering it changes many times within just one day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Ziegler</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/060316moor/#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Ziegler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 08:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1050#comment-573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online news outlets are certainly reshaping the economic structure of journalism, however, while traditional print struggles, online journalists need to make the committment now to not fall in the hands of profit-seeking business models when writing for the web.  The desire for efficient and attention-grabbing news delivery must not sacrifice the depth of coverage that often separates real news from informative entertainment that characterizes other media forms.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Online news outlets are certainly reshaping the economic structure of journalism, however, while traditional print struggles, online journalists need to make the committment now to not fall in the hands of profit-seeking business models when writing for the web.  The desire for efficient and attention-grabbing news delivery must not sacrifice the depth of coverage that often separates real news from informative entertainment that characterizes other media forms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Stephens</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/060316moor/#comment-572</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Stephens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 07:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1050#comment-572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like that this article suggests not trying to fight the shift toward web-based media.  Although adding video clips and links to other stories might not be best for journalistic integrity, it has to be done or readers will look elsewhere.  I would add, though, that the number one reason I go online for news (when I go online for news) is the opportunity to comment and have other people read those comments.  I guess I&#039;m saying that as online journalists we should aim above all else to provide an interactive experience for our readers.  The technology in our hands is no good unless it&#039;s used in this way.  I think this is something like what Anthony is saying when he says he (and other editors) want editors, not technical producers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like that this article suggests not trying to fight the shift toward web-based media.  Although adding video clips and links to other stories might not be best for journalistic integrity, it has to be done or readers will look elsewhere.  I would add, though, that the number one reason I go online for news (when I go online for news) is the opportunity to comment and have other people read those comments.  I guess I&#8217;m saying that as online journalists we should aim above all else to provide an interactive experience for our readers.  The technology in our hands is no good unless it&#8217;s used in this way.  I think this is something like what Anthony is saying when he says he (and other editors) want editors, not technical producers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristin Burroughs</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/060316moor/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristin Burroughs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 07:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1050#comment-571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The thing that I found most interesting in Moor&#039;s article was the issue of blogs and bloggers.  It intrigued me that the newspaper he works for allowed their columnists to become bloggers.  It is an interesting concept and one that I think will eventually be a part of every online newspaper.  The fact that blogging has become so prevalent in journalism scares me a bit.  If this is to be part of the &quot;next generation&quot; as David Whitely said, what are the boundaries of blogging?

The issue of job security is the first issue that comes to mind when I think of &#039;professional&#039; bloggers.  Are there specific stipulations written into their contract saying what they can and can&#039;t do and what determines termination?  But if this is the case, how can they really be writing on what they want?

Also, how can you be sure that what the blogger is writing is their opinion and not the opinion of the company or newspaper that they are writing for?  Is it a personal bias or a professional one?  Is the writing fact or fiction? What is the basis of its slant?  There is also the question of whether you are reading a personal commentary or a professional piece of writing.  Is what is being written the ramblings of an employee or is it actually a journalistic endeavor to inform the reader.

I think that while blogs are an interesting and sometimes informative piece of reading.  I don&#039;t think that they are the &quot;next generation&quot; of newspapers or journalists.  Just because you are a blogger does not make you a journalist, although it could be something that is done on the side, as with the columnists at Moor&#039;s newspaper.  While I do think that blogs will become a part of newspapers, I don&#039;t believe that it will only be done by reporters.  I think that there will be blogs of politicians, athletes, celebrities and maybe of ordinary citizens as extras to the newspaper&#039;s subject content.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing that I found most interesting in Moor&#8217;s article was the issue of blogs and bloggers.  It intrigued me that the newspaper he works for allowed their columnists to become bloggers.  It is an interesting concept and one that I think will eventually be a part of every online newspaper.  The fact that blogging has become so prevalent in journalism scares me a bit.  If this is to be part of the &#8220;next generation&#8221; as David Whitely said, what are the boundaries of blogging?</p>
<p>The issue of job security is the first issue that comes to mind when I think of &#8216;professional&#8217; bloggers.  Are there specific stipulations written into their contract saying what they can and can&#8217;t do and what determines termination?  But if this is the case, how can they really be writing on what they want?</p>
<p>Also, how can you be sure that what the blogger is writing is their opinion and not the opinion of the company or newspaper that they are writing for?  Is it a personal bias or a professional one?  Is the writing fact or fiction? What is the basis of its slant?  There is also the question of whether you are reading a personal commentary or a professional piece of writing.  Is what is being written the ramblings of an employee or is it actually a journalistic endeavor to inform the reader.</p>
<p>I think that while blogs are an interesting and sometimes informative piece of reading.  I don&#8217;t think that they are the &#8220;next generation&#8221; of newspapers or journalists.  Just because you are a blogger does not make you a journalist, although it could be something that is done on the side, as with the columnists at Moor&#8217;s newspaper.  While I do think that blogs will become a part of newspapers, I don&#8217;t believe that it will only be done by reporters.  I think that there will be blogs of politicians, athletes, celebrities and maybe of ordinary citizens as extras to the newspaper&#8217;s subject content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meredith Heagney</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/060316moor/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator>Meredith Heagney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1050#comment-570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I understand Anthony Moor&#039;s point that traditional media, such as print and TV, have lost momentum while online is thriving. Still, I don&#039;t think the print and broadcast vs. online debate has to be an either/or thing. Obviously, online sites can offer multimedia a paper never could. By the same token, a paper can give much more text and still be comfortable to read. Online news is obviously more immediate, but I still think print journalism tends to be more thorough. The two should supplement each other. Print organizations need to take their Web sites more seriously, though, that&#039;s for sure. It&#039;s too bad most budgets would never allow a whole separate web staff to ensure that the online component gets the proper attention.

I, too, am a soon-to-be journalism grad with no online experience. But for some reason, I&#039;m not panicking. I guess I figure that my youth alone will make people assume I &quot;know&quot; computers! Seriously, though, there are always ways to learn, and Moor pointed out that basic journalism skills are still the most important thing. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand Anthony Moor&#8217;s point that traditional media, such as print and TV, have lost momentum while online is thriving. Still, I don&#8217;t think the print and broadcast vs. online debate has to be an either/or thing. Obviously, online sites can offer multimedia a paper never could. By the same token, a paper can give much more text and still be comfortable to read. Online news is obviously more immediate, but I still think print journalism tends to be more thorough. The two should supplement each other. Print organizations need to take their Web sites more seriously, though, that&#8217;s for sure. It&#8217;s too bad most budgets would never allow a whole separate web staff to ensure that the online component gets the proper attention.</p>
<p>I, too, am a soon-to-be journalism grad with no online experience. But for some reason, I&#8217;m not panicking. I guess I figure that my youth alone will make people assume I &#8220;know&#8221; computers! Seriously, though, there are always ways to learn, and Moor pointed out that basic journalism skills are still the most important thing. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anne jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/060316moor/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>anne jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1050#comment-569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As another senior about to enter the professional market I am a little nervous about the skills you require of a young employee. However journalism is not my major, computers and technology are still very important and those skills along with them will always be important also. Are these technological skills the wave of the future and those that don&#039;t have the certain skills, will they be searching the classifieds to find any job that pays. I think those skills are important, but they are not the only ones that should be focused on. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As another senior about to enter the professional market I am a little nervous about the skills you require of a young employee. However journalism is not my major, computers and technology are still very important and those skills along with them will always be important also. Are these technological skills the wave of the future and those that don&#8217;t have the certain skills, will they be searching the classifieds to find any job that pays. I think those skills are important, but they are not the only ones that should be focused on. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Courtney Scarberry</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/060316moor/#comment-568</link>
		<dc:creator>Courtney Scarberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1050#comment-568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m also a senior journalism student who is taking her first class in online media.  This article&#039;s expectations for incoming journalists are a bit scary.

Online journalism is a wonderful medium because it lacks limitations; one isn&#039;t hindered by word count, space or color/b&amp;w.  But online journalists need to be aware of how their readers differ from print readers.  Online reading habits are quite different considering the availability and manueverability of a computer.  Online readers tend to skim more often and tend to demand more interesting, short material with as much visuals as possible.  With this in mind, I agree with another reader&#039;s comments that online and print should supplement each other, instead of battling over supremacy and/or future longevity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m also a senior journalism student who is taking her first class in online media.  This article&#8217;s expectations for incoming journalists are a bit scary.</p>
<p>Online journalism is a wonderful medium because it lacks limitations; one isn&#8217;t hindered by word count, space or color/b&#038;w.  But online journalists need to be aware of how their readers differ from print readers.  Online reading habits are quite different considering the availability and manueverability of a computer.  Online readers tend to skim more often and tend to demand more interesting, short material with as much visuals as possible.  With this in mind, I agree with another reader&#8217;s comments that online and print should supplement each other, instead of battling over supremacy and/or future longevity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie Gridley</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/060316moor/#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie Gridley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 10:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1050#comment-567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have to accept rather than fight where technology has brought us. The online world is now as much of a medium as print. I&#039;ve heard many journalists scold this transformation, but just as print will never be completely abandoned, neither will the online world.

I will be graduating in June with barely any experience in the online journalism world. That scares me because I feel like employers will be looking at fresh journalists, expecting them to have that cutting edge in the online world. I am not excited about the decline in print media. I am excited about the possibilities of using the internet as a companion to print mediums.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have to accept rather than fight where technology has brought us. The online world is now as much of a medium as print. I&#8217;ve heard many journalists scold this transformation, but just as print will never be completely abandoned, neither will the online world.</p>
<p>I will be graduating in June with barely any experience in the online journalism world. That scares me because I feel like employers will be looking at fresh journalists, expecting them to have that cutting edge in the online world. I am not excited about the decline in print media. I am excited about the possibilities of using the internet as a companion to print mediums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Saylor</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/060316moor/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Saylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1050#comment-566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good, albeit sobering, article, particularly for someone like me who is a senior in his last quarter and just now taking an online journalism course.
I have to say I agree with many of the previous posters&#039; comments about the need for solid reporters in addition to solid editors, and also that good stories should not be lost amid videos and podcasts and downloads and whatnot.
I guess I&#039;m wondering what options someone in my position has to be more knowledgeable about this field when this will probably my last quarter of college. Are seminars/conferences the way to go, or is there something else out there that I don&#039;t know about?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good, albeit sobering, article, particularly for someone like me who is a senior in his last quarter and just now taking an online journalism course.<br />
I have to say I agree with many of the previous posters&#8217; comments about the need for solid reporters in addition to solid editors, and also that good stories should not be lost amid videos and podcasts and downloads and whatnot.<br />
I guess I&#8217;m wondering what options someone in my position has to be more knowledgeable about this field when this will probably my last quarter of college. Are seminars/conferences the way to go, or is there something else out there that I don&#8217;t know about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret Kostendt</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/060316moor/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Kostendt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 07:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1050#comment-565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surely skilled reporters will eventually be as important as good editors in the world of online journalism. Multimedia wizardry and fancy interfaces are &quot;sexy&quot; and obviously have a role, but without a solid, creative story - the kind good reporters provide - a web piece won&#039;t go anywhere, no matter how interactive it is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely skilled reporters will eventually be as important as good editors in the world of online journalism. Multimedia wizardry and fancy interfaces are &#8220;sexy&#8221; and obviously have a role, but without a solid, creative story &#8211; the kind good reporters provide &#8211; a web piece won&#8217;t go anywhere, no matter how interactive it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>