<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Journalists Protest Conspiracy Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ojr.org/060712mcnicol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ojr.org/060712mcnicol/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=060712mcnicol</link>
	<description>Focusing on the future of digital journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:43:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Maisonet</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/060712mcnicol/#comment-640</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Maisonet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1132#comment-640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think that there should be a law-any law at all-that should stop journalists of any kind
from uncoverig any kind of truth whatsoever. The
news (from newspapers to even television), is
and always be made for one thing: to show
people the truth-by giving them what they want.
If having to be accused for something that
is so irrelevant as commencing any kind of investigation, then what is the point of
this law being made in the first place? I think that therefore the diet abolish the &quot;Journalists protest Conspiracy law&quot; all together, and just let the journalists continue what they do best:investigating and uncovering the truth. thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that there should be a law-any law at all-that should stop journalists of any kind<br />
from uncoverig any kind of truth whatsoever. The<br />
news (from newspapers to even television), is<br />
and always be made for one thing: to show<br />
people the truth-by giving them what they want.<br />
If having to be accused for something that<br />
is so irrelevant as commencing any kind of investigation, then what is the point of<br />
this law being made in the first place? I think that therefore the diet abolish the &#8220;Journalists protest Conspiracy law&#8221; all together, and just let the journalists continue what they do best:investigating and uncovering the truth. thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>