<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian site finds new ways to elicit reader reports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ojr.org/070124grier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ojr.org/070124grier/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=070124grier</link>
	<description>Focusing on the future of digital journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 15:02:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tish Grier</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/070124grier/#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator>Tish Grier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 07:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1271#comment-731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the really great things I found from exploring Oranto are the kinds of writers on it--some journalists but also very talented freelancers.  As a freelancer myself, I know the difficulty of trying to break into print, and Orato&#039;s giving some great writers the chance to get a few publishing creds under their belts.

Which could, in the end, make or break a pitch...

and thanks for pointing out the importance of the editorial model, Jeff! Orato&#039;s editorial model is also a good one. They understand the importance of original voice, and work well with it. That&#039;s one of the challenges of working in an online medium in general (something I&#039;ve also discovered from my editorial duties). Online is, in some respects, a mode of communication as much as a means of disseeminating of information and being too doctrinaire about AP or Chicago manual can, potentially, kill original voice.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the really great things I found from exploring Oranto are the kinds of writers on it&#8211;some journalists but also very talented freelancers.  As a freelancer myself, I know the difficulty of trying to break into print, and Orato&#8217;s giving some great writers the chance to get a few publishing creds under their belts.</p>
<p>Which could, in the end, make or break a pitch&#8230;</p>
<p>and thanks for pointing out the importance of the editorial model, Jeff! Orato&#8217;s editorial model is also a good one. They understand the importance of original voice, and work well with it. That&#8217;s one of the challenges of working in an online medium in general (something I&#8217;ve also discovered from my editorial duties). Online is, in some respects, a mode of communication as much as a means of disseeminating of information and being too doctrinaire about AP or Chicago manual can, potentially, kill original voice.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/070124grier/#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1271#comment-730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, great find and interview.

I think this is what &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.Broowaha.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BrooWaha.com&lt;/a&gt; should have aimed for. Orato offers money, money attracts quality, and reader input helps determine the rest. The layout of the website is nice too (if a bit sensational). Not too much scrolling, and it feels like a real newspaper website.

Of course, getting real journalists to post articles is the icing on the cake; but it&#039;s not likely something amateur bloggers could reproduce. Only a team with Orato&#039;s credentials is likely to have credibility with real journalists. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, great find and interview.</p>
<p>I think this is what <a HREF="http://www.Broowaha.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">BrooWaha.com</a> should have aimed for. Orato offers money, money attracts quality, and reader input helps determine the rest. The layout of the website is nice too (if a bit sensational). Not too much scrolling, and it feels like a real newspaper website.</p>
<p>Of course, getting real journalists to post articles is the icing on the cake; but it&#8217;s not likely something amateur bloggers could reproduce. Only a team with Orato&#8217;s credentials is likely to have credibility with real journalists. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>