<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eyetracking points the way to effective news article design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ojr.org/070312ruel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ojr.org/070312ruel/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=070312ruel</link>
	<description>Focusing on the future of digital journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:43:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Vogt</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/070312ruel/#comment-776</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Vogt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1300#comment-776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think &quot;areas of private anatomy&quot; is an especially apt term, considering that it&#039;s not terribly private on animals, and it&#039;s not that precise on humans. People have different views on what anatomy is private. If &quot;genital area&quot; is what is meant (and I think it is), that should be the term that is used.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think &#8220;areas of private anatomy&#8221; is an especially apt term, considering that it&#8217;s not terribly private on animals, and it&#8217;s not that precise on humans. People have different views on what anatomy is private. If &#8220;genital area&#8221; is what is meant (and I think it is), that should be the term that is used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Hartl</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/070312ruel/#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Hartl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1300#comment-775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting before-after-images. Thanks a lot. Especially the baseball-picture is surprising. I thought men and women should be changed. :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting before-after-images. Thanks a lot. Especially the baseball-picture is surprising. I thought men and women should be changed. <img src='http://www.ojr.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Lucee</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/070312ruel/#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Lucee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1300#comment-774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be useful to have such technology available to all designers, but simply following &quot;suggested rules of good design&quot; will have to serve.  Oh, well;  pity.

News design is as different per publication, as perhaps it should ever be.... who else wants to look like the WSJ?

I do think, however, there are academic grant monies to be won, clients to be served here.  Though my memory gets worse with age, it seems that capitalism prevails.

Perhaps a corollary is called-for to what scientist Svent-Gyorski once wrote (&quot;a &#039;substance&#039; is that which, when injected into an animal, produces a paper&quot;), which might go thus: &quot;when research might produce happier readers and more retained information and produce more dollars per view, a technology will be developed that will quantitate &#039;practical reason&#039; and avoid at all costs &#039;art&#039;.&quot;

Sorry for my awkward writing-- I loved the piece!
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be useful to have such technology available to all designers, but simply following &#8220;suggested rules of good design&#8221; will have to serve.  Oh, well;  pity.</p>
<p>News design is as different per publication, as perhaps it should ever be&#8230;. who else wants to look like the WSJ?</p>
<p>I do think, however, there are academic grant monies to be won, clients to be served here.  Though my memory gets worse with age, it seems that capitalism prevails.</p>
<p>Perhaps a corollary is called-for to what scientist Svent-Gyorski once wrote (&#8220;a &#8216;substance&#8217; is that which, when injected into an animal, produces a paper&#8221;), which might go thus: &#8220;when research might produce happier readers and more retained information and produce more dollars per view, a technology will be developed that will quantitate &#8216;practical reason&#8217; and avoid at all costs &#8216;art&#8217;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry for my awkward writing&#8211; I loved the piece!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenbun Chen</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/070312ruel/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenbun Chen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 03:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1300#comment-773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What an interesting survey!
I]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an interesting survey!<br />
I</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kamanashish Roy</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/070312ruel/#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>Kamanashish Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1300#comment-772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Daly</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/070312ruel/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Daly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1300#comment-771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rodney Hobson&#039;s comments surprise me.

The first set of graphics alone speak for themselves, and it took me about a minute to get the gist of it.

Any advice on web page presentation can only be a good thing and this is a new one on me. Logical when you think about it though. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rodney Hobson&#8217;s comments surprise me.</p>
<p>The first set of graphics alone speak for themselves, and it took me about a minute to get the gist of it.</p>
<p>Any advice on web page presentation can only be a good thing and this is a new one on me. Logical when you think about it though. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Niles</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/070312ruel/#comment-770</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Niles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 08:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1300#comment-770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, if you bailed out early you likely missed the, um, item toward the end of the story that elicited links from what seems like every blog in the universe yesterday. ;-)

(FWIW, the website you say, in your user profile, that you edit is a MFA parked domain. What&#039;s up with that?)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if you bailed out early you likely missed the, um, item toward the end of the story that elicited links from what seems like every blog in the universe yesterday. <img src='http://www.ojr.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>(FWIW, the website you say, in your user profile, that you edit is a MFA parked domain. What&#8217;s up with that?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Hobson</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/070312ruel/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney Hobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1300#comment-769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does this article actually say anything? It seems a very good example of how not to engage anyone&#039;s attention. It cetainly lost mine very early on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this article actually say anything? It seems a very good example of how not to engage anyone&#8217;s attention. It cetainly lost mine very early on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>