Comments on: Navigating slide shows: What do people choose when every choice is possible? http://www.ojr.org/070614paul/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=070614paul Focusing on the future of digital journalism Sun, 07 Apr 2013 15:02:13 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: suraj lamichhane http://www.ojr.org/070614paul/#comment-850 suraj lamichhane Fri, 22 Jun 2007 20:36:30 +0000 http://www.ojr.org/?p=1330#comment-850 it is good to put slide shows in a webpage but professionally speaking, slide shows make page loads slow, so it’s better to link each pages with seperate links. Apex College

]]> By: Jamie Bloomquist http://www.ojr.org/070614paul/#comment-849 Jamie Bloomquist Tue, 19 Jun 2007 07:51:35 +0000 http://www.ojr.org/?p=1330#comment-849 I also believe that having navigation controls that do not move as you browse from image to image encourages users to stay longer. The ‘next’ button may be the top choice for this reason – click through at your own pace, without having to take your attention away from the images.

]]> By: Anna Haynes http://www.ojr.org/070614paul/#comment-848 Anna Haynes Sat, 16 Jun 2007 12:55:54 +0000 http://www.ojr.org/?p=1330#comment-848 The results make sense to me. The readers won’t want to have to decide what order to view things in, they just want to see what you have to show them. It’s easier just to have the content provider provide a sequence.

Just because you can provide a bell or whistle doesn’t mean that the reader wants it.

]]> By: Paul Bradshaw http://www.ojr.org/070614paul/#comment-847 Paul Bradshaw Fri, 15 Jun 2007 03:43:50 +0000 http://www.ojr.org/?p=1330#comment-847 How old were the subjects? How web-savvy?

There

]]>