<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which online news award means the most?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ojr.org/080118awards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ojr.org/080118awards/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=080118awards</link>
	<description>Focusing on the future of digital journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:43:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 131.230.32.233</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/080118awards/#comment-1013</link>
		<dc:creator>131.230.32.233</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1426#comment-1013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Online awards often need to add more categories, particularly some of the college ones.
It&#039;s disheartening to see your innovative daily lose to a magazine running a &quot;feature&quot; on sex toys that features maybe three thumbnail pics.
Hello ICPA. Your online award stinks. Hello CMA, yours stinks a little less. College Publisher, your awards also smell.
How about divisions for daily, weekly and monthly. How about traffic awards broken into divisions by school enrollment size. How about blog, podcast, video, soundslide categories... for starters.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Online awards often need to add more categories, particularly some of the college ones.<br />
It&#8217;s disheartening to see your innovative daily lose to a magazine running a &#8220;feature&#8221; on sex toys that features maybe three thumbnail pics.<br />
Hello ICPA. Your online award stinks. Hello CMA, yours stinks a little less. College Publisher, your awards also smell.<br />
How about divisions for daily, weekly and monthly. How about traffic awards broken into divisions by school enrollment size. How about blog, podcast, video, soundslide categories&#8230; for starters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 66.67.10.115</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/080118awards/#comment-1012</link>
		<dc:creator>66.67.10.115</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1426#comment-1012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The poll is being gamed.

EPPY?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The poll is being gamed.</p>
<p>EPPY?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Niles</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/080118awards/#comment-1011</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Niles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1426#comment-1011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see that the EPpy fans are now flooding the poll. Interesting...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see that the EPpy fans are now flooding the poll. Interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Niles</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/080118awards/#comment-1010</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Niles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1426#comment-1010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that the &quot;Oscars of online&quot; is over-the-top hype. But I don&#039;t find their selection of honorees to be any less credible to any of the other awards one hears about.

They&#039;re clearly hauling in significant cash, given the entry fees. But they do move traffic to their honorees *far* more effectively than the OJAs, Edgies and EPpies, in my experience with these awards. So one could make an argument that they are cost-effective, should you make finalist, of course.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the &#8220;Oscars of online&#8221; is over-the-top hype. But I don&#8217;t find their selection of honorees to be any less credible to any of the other awards one hears about.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re clearly hauling in significant cash, given the entry fees. But they do move traffic to their honorees *far* more effectively than the OJAs, Edgies and EPpies, in my experience with these awards. So one could make an argument that they are cost-effective, should you make finalist, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 205.153.36.171</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/080118awards/#comment-1009</link>
		<dc:creator>205.153.36.171</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1426#comment-1009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has anyone ever investigated the Webby Awards? What are they, really?  I mean, who is the  International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences, sponsors them? I&#039;ve been in the new media field since before there was a WW Web. I&#039;ve never met anyone who participates.  The idea that there could be one entity that claims to judge everything from news to financial services, tourism, games, mobile advertising, &quot;viral marketing,&quot; etc. is absurd on the face of it.  I find it a bit embarrassing that every year respectable news organizations (like my own) invariably report on these awards and refer to them as the &quot;Oscars of online.&quot;  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone ever investigated the Webby Awards? What are they, really?  I mean, who is the  International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences, sponsors them? I&#8217;ve been in the new media field since before there was a WW Web. I&#8217;ve never met anyone who participates.  The idea that there could be one entity that claims to judge everything from news to financial services, tourism, games, mobile advertising, &#8220;viral marketing,&#8221; etc. is absurd on the face of it.  I find it a bit embarrassing that every year respectable news organizations (like my own) invariably report on these awards and refer to them as the &#8220;Oscars of online.&#8221;  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Orren</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/080118awards/#comment-1007</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Orren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1426#comment-1007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What about the elusive &quot;Quickbooks Profitability Prize&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the elusive &#8220;Quickbooks Profitability Prize&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>