<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should journalists vote?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ojr.org/080208vote/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ojr.org/080208vote/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=080208vote</link>
	<description>Focusing on the future of digital journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:43:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 128.197.245.3</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/080208vote/#comment-1072</link>
		<dc:creator>128.197.245.3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1438#comment-1072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see no reason why a journalist should shirk his responsibility as a citizen by not voting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see no reason why a journalist should shirk his responsibility as a citizen by not voting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 165.91.104.205</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/080208vote/#comment-1071</link>
		<dc:creator>165.91.104.205</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1438#comment-1071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Reporters should not campaign, put campaign signs in their yards, wear campaign buttons on their clothing. Doing that usurps the editorial power of the news medium.
  Reporters vote the same way as any citizen: by secret ballot; reporters are human; reporters have biases; reporters should keep their biases in mind to ensure that their report is as objective as possible.
  If reporters should not vote, then United States reporters should not cover the war in which the United States is a participant.  In fact, some reporters say that they are neutral, that their coverage of the war is from a neutral position. Thus, they justify all that business about U.S. soldiers killing so-called innocent civilians, women and children.
Douglas Perret Starr
Professor of Agricutural Communications and Journalism
Texas A&amp;M University]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>  Reporters should not campaign, put campaign signs in their yards, wear campaign buttons on their clothing. Doing that usurps the editorial power of the news medium.<br />
  Reporters vote the same way as any citizen: by secret ballot; reporters are human; reporters have biases; reporters should keep their biases in mind to ensure that their report is as objective as possible.<br />
  If reporters should not vote, then United States reporters should not cover the war in which the United States is a participant.  In fact, some reporters say that they are neutral, that their coverage of the war is from a neutral position. Thus, they justify all that business about U.S. soldiers killing so-called innocent civilians, women and children.<br />
Douglas Perret Starr<br />
Professor of Agricutural Communications and Journalism<br />
Texas A&#038;M University</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 207.200.116.136</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/080208vote/#comment-1070</link>
		<dc:creator>207.200.116.136</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1438#comment-1070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journalists, like all of us have opinions.  Those opinions will invariably come through in thier writing.  It&#039;s an involuntary action, like breathing.  You don&#039;t think about it, you just do it.

Writing is to a writer, like breathing.  It is something they must do and to ask them to be completly unbiased is rediculus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Journalists, like all of us have opinions.  Those opinions will invariably come through in thier writing.  It&#8217;s an involuntary action, like breathing.  You don&#8217;t think about it, you just do it.</p>
<p>Writing is to a writer, like breathing.  It is something they must do and to ask them to be completly unbiased is rediculus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 68.38.217.208</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/080208vote/#comment-1069</link>
		<dc:creator>68.38.217.208</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 00:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1438#comment-1069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ETHICS:

My comments address the seemingly never-ending struggle to obfuscate the topic and thereby effectively forever block introduction of ethics into journalism.

Invariably the topic is broached in an excruciatingly convoluted and complex manner. It almost seems as though this approach is due either to: an impossibly sincere attempt to address all possible eventualities that may lead to not being ethical or it any be this is due to a nefarious motive to make it impossible to ever attain ethics in journalism.

If the former, then I personally believe the ethical ground-rules can be reduced to a few strikingly simple axioms, in lieu of continuing the life struggle and career some have made of this topic to develop same without the least whiff of success.

If the latter, then journalists should look the developers of ethics criteria in the eye and label the effort the sham it is.

One, ethics in news journalism boils down to the taking of personal responsibility. If we are honest (a subjective characteristic - inbred or developed through persistence) with ourselves, if we have a conscious we all know when we are or are not being ethical.  So do the readers.

Two - simply put, being ethical in journalism is being factual, never opinionated. Not being opinionated encompasses not only content but also the selections of topics.

Individuals who choose an approach not governed by these axioms are not being ethical. Neither the individual nor a supposedly compensating bureaucracy of a group of overseers who refuse to accept the simple criteria - being factual vs. opinionated - will ever in sum total produce an ethical product. One loose cannon will spoil the product, whether reporter, editor, or publisher. There can never enough ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ETHICS:</p>
<p>My comments address the seemingly never-ending struggle to obfuscate the topic and thereby effectively forever block introduction of ethics into journalism.</p>
<p>Invariably the topic is broached in an excruciatingly convoluted and complex manner. It almost seems as though this approach is due either to: an impossibly sincere attempt to address all possible eventualities that may lead to not being ethical or it any be this is due to a nefarious motive to make it impossible to ever attain ethics in journalism.</p>
<p>If the former, then I personally believe the ethical ground-rules can be reduced to a few strikingly simple axioms, in lieu of continuing the life struggle and career some have made of this topic to develop same without the least whiff of success.</p>
<p>If the latter, then journalists should look the developers of ethics criteria in the eye and label the effort the sham it is.</p>
<p>One, ethics in news journalism boils down to the taking of personal responsibility. If we are honest (a subjective characteristic &#8211; inbred or developed through persistence) with ourselves, if we have a conscious we all know when we are or are not being ethical.  So do the readers.</p>
<p>Two &#8211; simply put, being ethical in journalism is being factual, never opinionated. Not being opinionated encompasses not only content but also the selections of topics.</p>
<p>Individuals who choose an approach not governed by these axioms are not being ethical. Neither the individual nor a supposedly compensating bureaucracy of a group of overseers who refuse to accept the simple criteria &#8211; being factual vs. opinionated &#8211; will ever in sum total produce an ethical product. One loose cannon will spoil the product, whether reporter, editor, or publisher. There can never enough </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/080208vote/#comment-1068</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1438#comment-1068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve long thought that &quot;unbiased journalism&quot; was nearly impossible to achieve in practice, and that it is totally impossible to overcome some readers&#039; perception of bias, no matter what you do.

In fact, for many years I&#039;ve been telling people, &quot;The only unbiased journalist is one who agrees with me on everything.&quot;

So yeah, I have biases. I prefer Linux to Windows, right to might, and have a strong tendence to support the underdog over the oppressor.

I like dogs. I like cats, too, but not as much as I like dogs.

I believe the West Wight Potter 15 is the cutest small, fiberglass cruising sailboat there is. (Disclosure: I own one.)

The ideal woman is named Debbie. She&#039;s 5&#039;4&quot;, has dark brown hair and eyes, and light brown skin. (And she&#039;s married to me; other men may have other women they feel are more ideal than Debbie, but that&#039;s THEIR problem.)

If Barack Obama becomes president, I think he&#039;ll take up smoking again (if he hasn&#039;t already, in secret).

And no, I did not vote for Obama in the primary. I probably would have, but I live in Florida and the national Democratic Party didn&#039;t want votes from Florida so I re-registered as a Republican and voted for John McCain.

Now I&#039;m registered as an independent again, which has pretty much been my natural state for the last decade or so.

   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve long thought that &#8220;unbiased journalism&#8221; was nearly impossible to achieve in practice, and that it is totally impossible to overcome some readers&#8217; perception of bias, no matter what you do.</p>
<p>In fact, for many years I&#8217;ve been telling people, &#8220;The only unbiased journalist is one who agrees with me on everything.&#8221;</p>
<p>So yeah, I have biases. I prefer Linux to Windows, right to might, and have a strong tendence to support the underdog over the oppressor.</p>
<p>I like dogs. I like cats, too, but not as much as I like dogs.</p>
<p>I believe the West Wight Potter 15 is the cutest small, fiberglass cruising sailboat there is. (Disclosure: I own one.)</p>
<p>The ideal woman is named Debbie. She&#8217;s 5&#8217;4&#8243;, has dark brown hair and eyes, and light brown skin. (And she&#8217;s married to me; other men may have other women they feel are more ideal than Debbie, but that&#8217;s THEIR problem.)</p>
<p>If Barack Obama becomes president, I think he&#8217;ll take up smoking again (if he hasn&#8217;t already, in secret).</p>
<p>And no, I did not vote for Obama in the primary. I probably would have, but I live in Florida and the national Democratic Party didn&#8217;t want votes from Florida so I re-registered as a Republican and voted for John McCain.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m registered as an independent again, which has pretty much been my natural state for the last decade or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 69.210.38.26</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/080208vote/#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>69.210.38.26</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1438#comment-1067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journalists spend way too much time worrying about things that readers don&#039;t care about, like AP style, for instance, and far too little time worrying about the things readers really want to know about, like whether that hatchet-job story on a GOP candidate was written by a journalist who&#039;s a liberal Democrat.

I got out of the newspaper business 13 years ago, after 22 years as an editor and reporter. And just in time, too.

 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Journalists spend way too much time worrying about things that readers don&#8217;t care about, like AP style, for instance, and far too little time worrying about the things readers really want to know about, like whether that hatchet-job story on a GOP candidate was written by a journalist who&#8217;s a liberal Democrat.</p>
<p>I got out of the newspaper business 13 years ago, after 22 years as an editor and reporter. And just in time, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>