Comments on: Convergence gone wrong? http://www.ojr.org/080319niles/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=080319niles Focusing on the future of digital journalism Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:43:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Robert Niles http://www.ojr.org/080319niles/#comment-1105 Robert Niles Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:52:11 +0000 http://www.ojr.org/?p=1456#comment-1105 I know that they’re trying to drive people to the website, and, as I wrote, part of me is very encouraged by the incorporation of Web design elements into the printed page. But, at the same time, seeing that unclickable “clickable element” gets under my skin a bit.

Funny thing is (to me, at least), I wouldn’t feel the same way about a full-screen shot of their video page. It’s just the embedded video element, pulled from *that* context and placed within a printed page which threw me. Go figure. I find it interesting how the Internet is reshaping readers’ expectations of functionality in design.

]]> By: 32.97.110.142 http://www.ojr.org/080319niles/#comment-1104 32.97.110.142 Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:03:15 +0000 http://www.ojr.org/?p=1456#comment-1104 The photo of the video on their website accompanies a blurb about the videos on their website. I don’t see a problem here.

]]> By: 68.3.20.2 http://www.ojr.org/080319niles/#comment-1103 68.3.20.2 Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:44:07 +0000 http://www.ojr.org/?p=1456#comment-1103 they’re driving people to their website – making it clear there is a video online… you missed the mark on this one.

]]>