New grassroots life for investigative reporting?

Might investigative journalism be ready to be re-born at the grassroots?

Until recently, this question wasn’t even asked much. If there was worry about what would happen to watchdog reporting with the decline of newspapers and other legacy media, it was expressed at the national level. It’s why the launch of ProPublica,, the investigative journalism non-profit, got such acclaim, and now why many of us will be paying close attention to the establishment of the Huffington Post Investigative Fund.

But look what’s happening now at the community level. Last summer came the launch of Texas Watchdog, which got one-year foundation funding to play watchdog over state government and other Texas institutions. Two months ago Investigative Voice in Baltimore sprang to life. Now David McCumber of the dear-departed Seattle Intelligencer is trying to rustle up funding for an investigative journalism site focusing on issues in the West. And a gang from the RIP Rocky Mountain News is aiming to launch InDenverTimes with the idea of making investigative work one of its centerpieces.

Meanwhile, investigative reporting centers in Wisconsin and Boston (plus likely additions in other locales) are raising the prospect of a state-by-state network that might have abundant university connections. Bill Buzenberg, director of the longtime giant of investigative reporting, the Center for Public Integrity, told me recently he could envision CPI as an umbrella organization fostering the growth and work of such a consortium. (Disclosure: My wife, Geneva Overholser, is on the CPI board.)

That all of this, or even some of this, might really blossom is speculative in the extreme. As Jay Rosen observed while helping preview the Huffington operation, investigative reporting is one area of journalism that is unlikely to have market support. Financing by philanthropists, foundations, readers, interested citizens will almost certainly be required.

But there’s little doubt that a head of steam is forming. And if grassroots investigative reporting takes off, one important moment will turn out to have occurred just last week, when the Voice of San Diego won a major award from Investigative Reporters and Editors. The four-year-old, muckraking Voice became the first community news site to win IRE’s online award – for its watchdog coverage of two downtown redevelopment agencies in San Diego.

Here’s how the Voice described its work: “The stories uncovered relationships between redevelopment officials and developers with lucrative development contracts and exposed a clandestine bonus system at (the agency) that the president used to pay herself and other employees $1 million over the course of five years. The result: The leaders of the agencies were fired or resigned, criminal investigations are under way, and the organizations have begun to undertake wholesale reforms.”

As IRE executive director Mark Horvit suggested in his lavish praise for the Voice’s work, the stakes here are not small. I’ve been arguing that it’s wrong to think just about I-team investigative units when pondering a future that does not include robust newspaper newsrooms. It’s better to describe the at-risk work as watchdog reporting, which I believe has a very large imprint on American journalism, and very large ripple effects in our country’s governments and other institutions.

So it’s been heartening, to say the least, to see a rising level of concern and action on the watchdog reporting front. Buzenberg has the Center for Public Integrity back on track after weathering a near-death experience. Robert Rosenthal’s Center for Investigative Reporting is exploring all manner of networking possibilities. And Paul Steiger is off to a fast start at ProPublica, demonstrating the value of partnerships with the New York Times, Washington Post, CBS and more. Steiger’s recent hiring of Amanda Michel will help kick-start the promising proposition that distributed reporting might assume a powerful role in the investigative world. (On that front, we already have the fascinating spot.us experiment that David Cohn is conducting.)

The mainstream press is part of this movement as well. Editors increasingly are talking not just about the threat to watchdog reporting, but of how they can preserve it as one of their core missions even as resources dwindle.

There are multiple strikes against the idea that watchdog reporting can actually gain a foothold as a grassroots movement. Practically any business model has sharp limitations when it comes to investigative work, which is time-consuming, treacherous in its predictability and certain to be controversial. So is there a financing mechanism that legions of out-of-work journalists and others could adopt that would at least partially bankroll accountability reporting projects?

The answer is likely many months or years away.

Even for the Voice of San Diego, with its budget of about $800,000 and eight full-time reporters, the reality of a sustainable investigative reporting operation is a distant hope. (See Update below.) Voice is financed partly by foundations and mostly by philanthropy, and neither the foundations nor philanthropists are intending for their funding to be permanent.

But it’s an island of stability compared to the challenges facing other sites. Texas Watchdog got first-year funding from the Sam Adams Alliance, but now is looking to other potential revenue streams, including advertising and money made off a citizen journalism training program. Baltimore’s Investigative Voice is in a different situation. It basically began with no start-up funding, and exists now with a few advertising dollars and contributions, but mostly free labor.

“The business model is a challenge,” said senior reporter Stephen Janis of Investigative Voice. The site has signed up several advertisers, he said, but ultimately will rise or fall on whether it can get readers to make voluntary payments – perhaps coupled with premium items such as a subscription to the Voice’s print-on-demand publication.

And yet both sites have quickly shown how critical it is for local watchdog reporting to thrive. Texas Watchdog has gotten notice with its reports on dead people on voter rolls. Investigative Voice has landed several scoops in its first two months of operation, including coverage spotlighting questionable trips to the Caribbean approved by Baltimore’s pension board.

Scott Broom, a blogger and reporter at WUSA-TV in Washington, wrote that Investigative Voice “is a wake-up call to traditional print reporters and broadcasters” and is demonstrating the power of “one-man-band digital reporting.”

Janis said others who want to start a watchdog reporting site must be willing to “rethink how they work, how they report, and what merits reporting. The Web is a very fluid information outlet, so you have to work much harder to find readers.”

And worth it? “Despite all the challenges, he said, “this has been the most interesting endeavor of my career.”

UPDATE: Scott Lewis of the Voice of San Diego pushes back on my assertion that the Voice, which he leads with Andrew Donohue, is a long way from attaining sustainability.

In an e-mail he wrote: “Yes, the grants we received from foundations aren’t permanent. But our number of donors is exploding. We now have 822 donors… None of our donors have indicated to me that they plan to pull back. Quite the contrary, they are more passionate than ever.

“While I don’t think we’ll always have the donors we have now, I don’t understand what is so exotic about our model. Why are we so unsustainable compared to, say, public radio? The local NPR affiliate raises $20 million from donors and grants who may or may not think of their annual funding as permanent. Our budget this year has been expanded to just over $1 million. Why is it so crazy to imagine that, using almost the exact same fundraising formula, we could reach one-tenth of the funding that KPBS gets?

“This year, we’re projecting a massive increase in our corporate sponsorships. And the number of $1,000 to $5,000 donors is going up each week. Is it really that crazy to think that, like the opera or museum of art, we’ll be able to significantly diversify our funding to sustain a $2 million organization?”

Recession? Local news sites are hanging tough

Mary Morgan couldn’t have picked a more difficult time (the middle of a recession) and place (Michigan and double-digit unemployment) to start a new community Web site. So why is she smiling?

It’s because Ann Arbor Chronicle is coming up on its six-month anniversary, it’s meeting financial targets, and Morgan and husband/business partner Dave Askins are able to pay household bills out of revenue from the site. “When I was a business reporter, I used to laugh at firms that marked each anniversary,” said Morgan, who acts as publisher. “Now I know how they feel.”

With a deep and potentially long recession set in, I wanted to circle back with Morgan and some of the other for-profit news site owners I talked with last fall, and see how their mostly new operations were faring. The question has taken on more urgency in recent weeks. As economic conditions have worsened and newspapers have shown accelerating signs of stress, the health of these online-only news sources seems suddenly more critical.

The anecdotal answer from my small sample group is this: So far they’re hanging tough. Business hasn’t fallen much, if at all, and most are instituting expansion plans. If they’re a barometer, community news sites have some resiliency to them.

“We have seen some impact from the economy in terms of advertisers cutting spending or even going out of business,” said Jonathan Weber, who’s been running New West since 2005. “On the other hand, this kind of dislocation forces people to revisit how they are spending money, and rethink their marketing strategies overall, and that is actually very good for us.”

The group also answers affirmatively another fundamental question for what seems to be a growing number of people thinking about starting up a community news sites: Can you do this and make a living?

Local news sites come in all sizes and shapes. Some are non-profits. Some aren’t trying to live off the operation. But for those who are, some survivable wages are being earned.

Tracy Record and Patrick Sand, another husband/wife team who operate West Seattle Blog, are getting revenue in the high five figures. Debbie Galant, co-owner of Baristanet, earned more from the site than she did from her free-lance writing business last year. And Bob Gough, who runs Quincy News, pockets $1,000 a week in wages from his startup that serves an Illinois community of only 40,000.

Gough, fired from his TV news job in the fall of 2007, may be Exhibit A for the potential of independent news sites. A one-man band, Gough has mined 40 Quincy advertisers, writes about the heart of civic and political life in town and is now hoping to expand by hiring additional staff. His two original investors are also thinking growth, looking at the possibility of replicating the Quincy News model elsewhere.

Galant, at Baristanet, has even bigger expansion plans. The Montclair, N.J., site, established in 2004, will soon partner with another community site, Montclairkids, rebranding it as Baristakids. The idea, said Galant, is to expand Baristanet’s network in a way that expands reach and revenue for both partners.

With the help of new-media expert Jeff Jarvis, she also plans an incubator model offering turnkey services to news site aspirants. Baristanet’s servers, basic business model and consultation services would be available to new players, with Galant and co-owner Liz George taking a share of revenue.

Many of the news-site operators I spoke with see indications that local advertisers, while hammered by the recession, are still acclimating themselves to the possibilities of low-cost pitches on their sites. “In general, I think the online opportunity at the non-metro local level remains pretty untapped,” said Weber.

But many are also diversifying, as Weber has done for years with his New West conferences and indoor billboard advertising business. Nancy Peckenham, who runs the New York Cornwall-on-Hudson site, is heading in a different direction. She’s now able to receive contributions through a 501(c)3 sponsor and will start a fund drive this spring.

I also asked many of these new-media journalists about the burnout factor in a business that, at this juncture, is famously all-work, little pay.

Tracy Record, the ubiquitous poster at West Seattle Blog, and emblematic of the grit you see in this world, had this response: “You have to look at it like any small business. You kill yourself trying to get it off the ground. Stop whining about that. We have been dismissed by people saying, ‘You’re going to burn out.’ No, we’re not.”

Here’s a closer looking at some of the people who are making a go in the for-profit sector:

West Seattle Blog (Seattle)
Tracy Record and Patrick Sands don’t try to cover all of Seattle, much less all of greater Seattle. Their target is the 58,000 people who live in the West Seattle area. And they never seem to stop.

Patrick handles ad sales, Tracy is the incessant, 24/7 poster, and they use their knowledge of and passion for West Seattle to do everything from watchdog coverage to bake sales. Visiting fellow Jane Stevens at the University of Missouri did a great case study on their operation.

Here’s some of Tracy’s e-mail response to my question of how things are going in their three-year-old operation:

“I am adamant about the ‘hyper-local’ space being a place for local independents. I am sick to death of these national VC-funded operations (Patch, American Towns, whoever else) trying to swoop in and say, ‘Hey! We’re your plug-and-play hyperlocal news!’ No, you are NOT. Nor is a voiceless aggregator. Let’s not let this precious new type of coverage be poisoned the way the ‘big corporate media’ world evolved from local, independently owned tv/newspapers/whatever … It may happen eventually but don’t smother this industry from birth!

“Every community has different needs, and must be served by someone who tailors the service based on what they learn in interaction with their community. I WISH that the people throwing money around would share some with those of us who are bootstrapping, rather than yet ANOTHER aggregator, or sharing site, or whatever. THIS is where the action is happening and the future is being paved. But I can’t get a Whatever Grant to so much as give me the time of day. Just not considered sexy enough to be busting your butt uncovering and/or sharing information and news in real-time re: your community.

“Back to the community … it really is all about community. Someone wrote that out there in the “future of media” writing sphere this week. We really aren’t a news site so much as a community site. Some of what the community is interested in is the news we dig up or follow up on etc. Some is news they share. Some is what they post in the forum. Some is what we are all part of in our parallel Twitter and Facebook streams (and who KNOWS who’s next). Even our ads are perceived as more a community service … letting people know about businesses and services out there. And much of what we do community-wise never hits the site … half my day is spent answering e-mails, either resource questions or checking out rumors that don’t pan out but at least I write back ‘here’s what I found out.'”

New West (Missoula, Mont.)
Jonathan Weber’s vision of a Western regional Web site that anchors a highly entrepreneurial business remains a new-media icon. With a staff of nine, NewWest reports on issues that unite the West – the environment, wildlife, development, politics, water and the like.

But Weber has leveraged that core by sponsoring a series of conferences that focus on these issues. One next week is called “Designing the New West, Architecture and Landscape in the Mountain West,” and is sold out. He also layers on an editorial services arm, a display advertising business and an events-calendar product.

Web is a fierce advocate of the for-profit model for independent news sites, even to call foundation-funded models “unfair” competition. In a recent blog, he said the free market was the best guarantor of success for his company. “Here at NewWest.Net, we’re getting by with online advertising, a solid conference business, a few complimentary activities like online event calendars, and relentless effort to do a lot with a little,” he wrote… “And the happy fact is that the last three months have been our best ever on the business side, despite the economy and the general ad-market meltdown.”

Here’s how Weber responded when I asked him about business conditions:

“We have seen good growth in online ad sales over the past 4-5 months. Despite what the conventional wisdom in the business says about falling CPMs, we are in fact getting very healthy CPMs for our ads. I think we have done a much better job recently in offering good ad tools in areas like flash and video advertising, and generally positioning ourselves as the next-generation media partner for local businesses. Longevity also helps — we have been around four years now, lots of online publications come and go but I think people are now persuaded that we are here for the long run.

“We have seen some impact from the economy in terms of advertisers cutting spending or even going out of business. On the other hand, this kind of dislocation forces people to revisit how they are spending money, and rethink their marketing strategies overall, and that is actually very good for us. On the local level, most advertisers are not very far along in the transition to online, and I think the economic dislocations are actually helping to push that along. Some categories, notably real estate-related, are obviously very weak, but other sectors are more than picking up the slack.

“In general, I think the online opportunity at the non-metro local level remains pretty untapped. That’s why I think it’s way too early to give up on the idea that local journalism can be a business.”

Ann Arbor Chronicle (Ann Arbor, Mich.)
When Mary Morgan wrote me last fall about the new site that she and her husband had established in Ann Arbor, Mich., this is how she described its mission: “Ultra-local events within easy arm’s reach – whether it’s a pickup softball game, a client meeting in a coffee shop, a spontaneous political caucus, a school play – that’s the lens through which The Chronicle sees topics like entertainment, economic development, government, education.”

So far it’s worked. Here’s the update Morgan e-mailed me earlier this week:

“We’re coming up on our six-month anniversary (when I was a business reporter, I used to laugh at firms that marked each anniversary…now I know how they feel!) and we’re hitting our financial goals, which were admittedly modest. Without getting too specific, we’re now in a position to pay our household bills (mortgage, health insurance, etc.) with revenue from The Ann Arbor Chronicle.

“Aside from the initial investment in equipment (primarily laptops and digital cameras) and site design, we’ve kept our overhead costs fairly low. Our next goal will be to grow revenue to the point of being able to hire freelancers or even (gasp) part-time or full-time staff.

“Given the economy, especially in Michigan, I’m pleased with how things are going. Interesting to me is the number of non-business advertisers we’ve signed up: two local school systems, a school within the University of Michigan, the public library and some local government agencies, in addition to the retailers, banks and other business advertising I’d anticipated.

“Our readership is growing as well, which is crucial to our advertising, obviously. We had nearly 20,000 readers (measured by unique IPs) visit the site in January. We started out in our first month (September 2008) with about 4,000.

Quincy News (Quincy, Ill.)
Quincy hardly seemed like the right place to launch an independent news startup. It already had an established newspaper and, despite having just 40,000 residents, two local TV stations.

But then, Bob Gough had just lost his TV news job in the fall of 2007, and was firmly rooted in the western Illinois community. With the help of two investors, he launched Quincy News in 2008 and has quickly signed up enough advertisers to pay his $1,000-a-week salary, his $350-a-month rent and a few other operational costs.

But it’s still a tough go. “We’ve got an Internet connection and a cell phone but no land line and no fax,” said Gough. “And that’s hard because the city refuses to e-mail me its press releases.” Gough contends that’s part a city government tilt toward the Quincy Herald-Whig, which he says derives from the local daily’s “glowing, fawning coverage” of City Hall.

Gough figures his audience – roughly 9,000 unique monthly visitors – is already not much less than half the numbers of the Herald-Whig. But his dream of adding a staffer, or a part-timer, is still on hold. “I’m making enough to pay the bills,” he said. “But not enough to add a second person.”

Baristanet (Montclair, N.J.)
Montclair’s proximity to Broadway, just 15 miles away, may account for the sass that Debbie Galant and Liz George have baked into Baristanet.

“It’s important to have a personality-driven site,” said Galant, who was a novelist and free-lance writer before adding Web-site owner to her credentials. “It’s the news, yes, but it’s not just the steak that makes you successful. It’s also the sizzle.” Baristanet has almost 85,000 monthly unique visitors.

Galant is bullish about the upcoming addition of MontclairKids to the site. It’s Baristanet’s first partnership, and once live the material will be branded as Baristakids. Owners of the Montclair kids site will get a revenue share, said Galant.

Next up will be the Baristanet Incubator which will leverage the site’s infrastructure and expertise to help launch new Web site operators. Baristanet might charge an up-front fee of $5,000 and then take 25 percent of revenue and equity from the new business, Galant said.

“I think with these projects we are starting to get more involved in the idea of networks and networking,” she said.

Galant siad business tailed off a bit in January but had been running strong until that point. She said Baristanet’s nearly five years of experience in Montclair are beginning to pay dividends.

“This was a really a hard sell for us at the beginning,” she said. “What’s happening now, though, which is really fabulous for us, is that our readers and advertisers sell us. A new business opens and people ask them, ‘Have you been on Baristanet?'”

Some other notes from local news sites:

Cornwall-on-Hudson (Nancy Peckenham)
“Honestly, I am not seeing much of a recession impact on my advertisers. I have been running the site since mid-2006 and most of my advertisers are local businesses that are supportive of the site and appreciate being able to target the local community.

“The daily newspaper here serves three counties and a newspaper ad is a lot more costly than an ad on my site, which can be had for as little as $50 a month (up to $125). As a one-person band, I actually spend a very small percentage of my time actively selling ads. Most advertisers come to me because they see the value. I do have expansion plans, however, and am in the process of hiring a part-time content writer so that I can concentrate on the business side. I am optimistic about recruiting new advertisers because I do believe that in this climate small is beautiful and people are recognizing more than ever the importance of community to support each other.

“My readership has not dropped off, either. In 2008 I had 36,000 unique visitors and 140,000 visits — in a town of 13,000.”

Dagger Press (Steve James, Baltimore)
“Traffic is up slightly over the past six months, around 15 percent. Now that the Maryland General Assembly is in session, we tend to have more articles on a daily basis which will help as well.

“We’ve lost a few writers but have gained a few more, so it’s almost evened out. As for revenues, we still haven’t been able to carry out our advertising plans other than Google Adwords. We have made our advertising kit and determined preliminary prices, but haven’t taken the next step to start soliciting potential advertisers. That should
be coming in the near future.”

Black White Red (Steve Crozier, Dallas)
“Audience continues to grow at a rapid pace, roughly doubling each year. Our revenue has averaged a 10 percent increase month-over-month for the last 13 months.
We’d like to do better, and we can as our critical mass of readers grows. But we’re being careful not to sacrifice quality for growth.

“The recession hasn’t hit us too badly here in Dallas. However, the last 30 days has thrown some hints that things may slow down somewhat. Bucking the trend, our CPM remains very high: selling targeted local advertising to local readers is the answer.”

Note: The Knight Digital Media Center is hosting an entrepreneurial journalism workshop in May at the USC Annenberg School Journalism. More than 100 people have applied for the 12 slots.

Newspapers may seek philanthropy to support news-gathering

Could newspapers and local broadcasters begin seeking philanthropic support from the civic foundations and private donors that are starting to bankroll news non-profits? It appears entirely likely. With for-profit media watching their news-gathering resources dwindle, some editors say they’re open to the idea of seeking help from donors.

Charlotte Hall, president of the American Society of Newspaper Editors, told me the idea raises multiple questions about how newspapers could solicit philanthropic support and still retain credibility. But bottom line? “I believe that a model could emerge for foundations to fund some local reporting at newspapers — investigative reporting or an important local beat, for example,” she said in an e-mail. “A new kind of firewall would be needed to assure independent reporting and unencumbered editing.”

The idea that for-profit media might seek subsidies from community foundations came into sharp focus last week, when the Knight Foundation awarded $5 million to 21 civic foundations that pitched plans for expanding news and information in their communities. Some of the ideas sounded much aligned with the mission statements of local newspapers and TV stations.

The most striking was a winning proposal from the San Antonio Area Foundation, which received a $488,500 Knight grant to produce live Web video on community issues. Its proposal began this way: “Although ranked in the top 50 media markets in the country, San Antonio lacks in-depth news coverage about diverse communities and issues.”

Robert Rivard, editor of the San Antonio Express-News, was taken aback. He sought out the foundation’s director, Reggie Williams, to ask how the foundation could be making such a claim given the newspaper’s concerted efforts to reflect and report on the city’s diversity. Williams issued a statement praising San Antonio’s local media and, while not backing away from the project, said it was in no way intended as a slap.

But no expression of comity could mask the powerful dynamic on display. Local foundations were teaming up with Knight to support a total of $17 million worth of new-media journalism that, in many cases, the for-profit media in town would love to be doing.

I e-mailed Rivard asking if the Express-News would be willing to compete for foundation money of the kind Knight gave to the San Antonio foundation. It took him less than 5 minutes to respond. “We would have shown keen interest in such a grant, which could fund a couple of teams of online documentary journalists for two years and help us move more rapidly to enrich the site with dynamic content not repurposed from the print edition,” he said. “I wouldn’t have a problem accepting funds from such a reputable foundation, especially since it’s a leader in the movement to reinvent the way we gather and distribute news and information…”

Nancy Barnes, editor of the Minneapolis Star Tribune, said newsroom leaders there have also kicked around the idea of seeking philanthropic support. “What we need most as a newspaper is investigative help,” she said. “If I could get some non-profit funding for that, it’s a plus… That’s the part that must survive.” The Star Tribune last week sought to reorganize its business under Chapter 11 bankruptcy provisions.

And how does Knight feel about the possibility of redirecting some of its philanthropy to newspapers and broadcasters? The idea seems potentially at odds with Knight’s determination to encourage news innovation, not to mention foundations’ reluctance to invest in profit-making ventures. But Knight said the door is open.

“In general, we support nonprofit endeavors,” said Marc Fest, Knight’s vice president of communications. “What we’re open to are innovative ideas from wherever.” He pointed out that Knight has backed MTV and Village Soup, both for-profit concerns but worthy recipients because of their strong proposals.

In fact, Jan Schaffer, executive director of J-Lab at American University in Washington, said there’s nothing new about journalism foundations supporting for-profits. Between 1993 and 2002 Schaffer said she funded 120 pilot projects with mainstream news organizations, many of them profit-seeking, as director of the Pew Center for Civic Journalism.

“So, I would suggest that many news organizations have been open to this idea for, oh, the last 15 years,” she said.

Robin Reiter, a Miami adviser to Knight in its new communities grant program, said many foundations aren’t willing to go through the hoops required when their money is given to for-profit businesses. An “expenditure responsibility requirement” kicks in that can be costly and time-consuming, she said. But Reiter said newspapers or broadcasters, joining with civic foundations, could easily get around that problem through a partnership.

“Let’s say the newspaper brings $100,000 worth of resources to the table for a project, and the foundation brings its own $100,000,” she said. As long as no money changed hands, a little creative partnering could end up doubling the newspaper’s investment. “A newspaper could, for example, set up its own nonprofit arm,” said Reiter.

The Knight program is but one aspect of the new competitive environment that legacy media find themselves confronting across the country. Increasingly, in big metros like Minneapolis as well as smaller ones like Quincy, Ill., online-only news sites, both nonprofits and for-profits, are springing up to compete for news and local ad dollars.

The relationship between these sites and the big news guns in town — newspapers and broadcast outlets — is much in flux. At an industry level, there’s a push toward collaboration. ASNE is in the process of changing its bylaws to admit the editors of Web-only news organizations. And Schaffer is starting what she calls a “networked journalism” project that will partner five news organizations with five citizen media sites.

But some editors have questions about foundation funding by Knight and others of community online news sites.

Bill Marimow, editor of thePhiladelphia Inquirer, told me that the idea “is troubling to me… All of us in newspapers are struggling to fulfill our public service mandate. Creating competition at a time of flagging revenues and rofits runsis contrary to preserving the core mission.”

The involvement of local civic foundations in supporting alternatives to the hometown media is particularly intriguing, partly because legacy media over the year have often been the financial and leadership bedrock of these organizations.

In an e-mail (her full statement is at the end), Hall said she believes newspapers should embrace much of what the new-media grants represent. “Most seem aimed at fulfilling specific unmet needs, rather than displacing existing media, thereby broadening a community’s information sources and providing a platform for more local voices,” she said. “That is to be applauded and nurtured.” She acknowledged that many newspapers have had to trim staffs. At the same time, she said newspapers are innovating in new media forms at a fast pace, and remain dominant information sources in their communities.

At one level, most newspapers seem comfortable with a nonprofit partner. There’s been little pushback against the idea of pairing up at a newsgathering level with a nonprofit like Pro-Publica, for example, or the Center for Public Integrity or the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting. The questions become more difficult when the philanthropy is not from a journalism organization.

Hall said many questions would have to be addressed: “Do we lose our independence if we take money from a foundation? What about from individuals? What about from the government? Can an NPR model emerge for local newspapers as profitability erodes? Are all foundations created equal on the independence issue? Is funding from the Knight Foundation different from funding from a foundation with a political agenda or a single-issue agenda? Should we take money from a local foundation we cover?”

Here’s the full transcript from ASNE’s Charlotte Hall, who is editor of the Orlando Sentinel:

“I think that relations with community foundations probably vary from newspaper to newspaper, so I can’t generalize on how a grant would affect those relationships. Generally, newspapers have had two faces in the community: an editorial face that is independent and that works for the public good through its reporting and editorial positions, and a corporate citizen face that fulfills the civic responsibility of an influential business through philanthropy and board service. The relationship of the business side and philanthropies should not affect news coverage.

“As I read through the list of the Knight grants, I was impressed by the range of projects. Most seem aimed at fulfilling specific unmet needs, rather than displacing existing media, thereby broadening a community’s information sources and providing a platform for more local voices. That is to be applauded and nurtured. ASNE, in its proposed changes to its membership criteria, recognizes and welcomes the emergence of Web-only news sources.

“Newspapers and their Web sites generally have the largest audience among local news sources, but declining staffs have left some areas under-covered. I would add, however, that editors have made local public service journalism a priority as they’ve had to make cuts. They also have used their Web sites to deepen public service reporting with databases, documents, video, photo slide shows, crowd-sourcing and interactivity. Because of their large audience and their ability to uncover stories, newspapers remain influential in the public life of their communities.

“The question of whether newspapers should seek and accept foundation funding deserves a lot of discussion. Independence is the basis of journalistic credibility. That’s why we separate the business side from the editorial side and why we enforce tough ethics codes. Do we lose our independence if we take money from a foundation? What about from individuals? What about from the government? Can an NPR model emerge for local newspapers as profitability erodes? Are all foundations created equal on the independence issue? Is funding from the Knight Foundation different from funding from a foundation with a political agenda or a single-issue agenda? Should we take money from a local foundation we cover?

“The questions seem endless, yet I believe that a model could emerge for foundations to fund some local reporting at newspapers–investigative reporting or an important local beat, for example. But a new kind of firewall would be needed to assure independent reporting and unencumbered editing. We live in the most exciting–and most scary–time imaginable for media. We need to experiment boldly and guard our values. I think we can do both.”