Not just a homicide map

Last month’s Online Journalism Awards recognized the projects for which the medium is a large part of the message: those groundbreaking vehicles for reporting and storytelling made possible by the Web.

Oakland Tribune Web producers Katy Newton and Sean Connelley were the stars of that show, taking home two awards for Not Just A Number, their multi-layered interactive project geared toward humanizing homicide statistics in Oakland, Calif., consistently home to one of the nation’s highest murder rates.

Plotting crime on a map is nothing new. The Los Angeles Times similarly tracks its city’s murders in real time. Minneapolis’ Rake Magazine rolled out a homicide location graphic in an acclaimed feature, “Murder By Numbers,” earlier this year.

Though similar in appearance, Not Just a Number goes well beyond merely pinning crime stats on a city grid. It holds a magnifying glass over each anonymous coordinate on Oakland’s crowded murder map (112 thus far in 2007), enabling an intimate interactivity among the family, friends and loved ones of each murder victim. Behind each number lies a hub for mourners to exchange stories, photos, music and anything else to bring the victim out from behind a mug shot and a police report.

The project won Katy, Sean and the Tribune the Knight Award for Public Service, “honoring digital journalism that produces compelling coverage of a vital issue and engages a geographic community.”

OJR swapped emails with the producers to find out how a grassroots community project became an award-winning model for in-depth Web reporting and digital public service.

OJR: Could you briefly walk us through the genesis of Not Just A Number? Was there some specific job in your professional Web-production lives that sparked the idea?

KN: Sean and I are married. At that time, Sean was a full-time photographer at The Trib. He was having to go and take photos of the homicides and when he got home we would talk about it. We found ourselves counting off the homicides “number 65 happened today”…”now we are at 75″ — that shocked us. We were forgetting that these victims were not just numbers but human beings. The initial goal was simply to find the families and learn more about the victims to help desensitize the issue of violence. The Tribune had done a homicide map every year in the paper, but there had never been anything done for online. We felt including statements from the families and friends of the victims would be really powerful and interactive was a great tool for telling the story.

SC: We brought our initial idea to Kathleen Kirkwood, Associate Editor for Online News. She was very supportive — basically said I love it go for it. She also suggested we contact a woman named Marilyn Washington Harris who runs the Khadafy Foundation. Her son Khadafy Washington had been killed in 2000. Marilyn now volunteers her time to help other families through the process of losing a loved one to violence. She is amazing.

KN: She met Sean and I at her “unofficial” office a local funeral home. We told her the idea and asked for her help contacting the families. She was interested but a little skeptical at first. She was concerned about our intentions and how the families and the victims would be presented. She told us that in many ways the survivors of the violence felt betrayed by the media. They were concerned with the use of police mug shots as identification of the victim. We got this a lot from others in the community as well. Here is a letter received from a reader on the issue of using police mug shots for id’ing murder victims:

“Mug shots scream GUILTY and that is a verdict the courts decided without taking into consideration what issues were occurring before, during and after his release from jail. My brother’s journey started way before he was in the system. When my father beat my mother in front of us… and he learned there was no consequence for that, it started. When we experienced our first police raid in my grandmother’s apartment, though there were no drugs found, the journey started. When he/we first had to identify ourselves as ‘homeless’ after my grandmother’s passing, we knew what options were left for Mar to choose from. And there are no photos of those times and no reporters recording those stats.”

That meeting with Marilyn was critical because hearing her concerns echoed this nagging feeling of a general desensitization and need to approach the story from a new direction.

SC: About that time, also met with Jane Ellen Stevens who co-wrote “Reporting on Violence – A Handbook for Journalists” and is also a journalism professor at UC-Berkeley. She helped us look at violence from a health perspective and not judicial.

As the project began picking up more speed, we started interviewing families and meeting more community members and we would always ask them what would they like to see be included in the project or how could we report on violence better.

Everyone wanted ‘Solutions’ — what can they do, how can the public get involved. We took their responses to heart and created areas on our site to address their issues.

Side note, Oakland is a town of organizers, historically. Huge civil rights changes have come from this city and not too long ago. People remember, and you feel that history when you go out and talk to people. Oakland is an amazing place and in the end, this project became a result of so many people in that community. I love that about it.

OJR: How long did the whole thing take to develop and launch?

SC: The idea, which Katy talks about in the previous question, started percolating around August of 2006. We started designing the site in September and I guess by mid-October I began to build and program the site. All the while, I was still working full-time as a staff photographer at the Tribune and Katy and I were also out there collecting content for the site. So it was a very interesting juggling act that we had to do. We did get a lot of support from several people in the newsroom who gave us the time and support to able to create it. Finally, the site launched on March 4th, 2007 to coincide with a homicide package that the Tribune runs every year.

OJR: What was the initial blueprint for the site, and what was the Tribune’s reaction when you pitched the idea?

KN & SC: We first just wanted to do an interactive homicide map with maybe a message board. Then after meeting various people in the community it grew to what it is now. The Tribune was very excited about the idea when we pitched them the idea. We went in with a little flash prototype we made up and I think that helped convey the idea.

OJR: As producers, what is your day-to-day interaction with Tribune reporters and editors, and how much hands-on access do they have to the site itself?

SC: We are very open to anyone in the newsroom to come to us with ideas. We also go to them when we find they are working on a story that would fit our site. We basically maintain the site right now but will eventually be shifting the responsibilities to other editors and even reporters if appropriate. Those responsibilities would be updating the data and posting new stories.

The site was created so that reporters or editors who weren’t necessarily comfortable with flash could easily update the site. Basically, there is a series of forms for each section of the site. The reporter can open the forms and input the new data, which then updates the site.

OJR: The “Features and Stories” section houses a pretty comprehensive mix of articles, videos and interactive one-off sites. How often is that updated, and what does content management entail?

KN: Usually, there are a couple of new stories added each month. Unfortunately, when the site was launched the paper went through a big shift. The Trib joined with The Contra Costa Times and The San Jose Mercury News under The Bay Area News Group — people had other things to focus on. Things have settled and people have more time to do multimedia and special features. It’s actually really exciting how the reporters have responded to the project. A lot of that credit goes out to Kathleen Kirkwood, who is awesome about recruiting reporters stories for the NJN.

OJR: How about the “Stories by You” section? Do family members and friends of victims come forward with those, or does that require some solicitation on your part?

KN & SC: The idea for this component of the site came about while researching the story, we discovered there were many after-school programs teaching youth new journalism tools, mostly video and audio pod casts. Oakland youth are so impacted by the violence, they were already reporting their own stories about this issue. We were impressed with the videos we saw, so we thought it would be great to showcase the work on the site — that’s how the community voices page developed.

Joe Weiss of SoundSlides, generously donated copies of his program to us and we handed them out to some of these organizations. We have had a few people send us content but for the most part ithas been slow. You really need a person that can go out consistently to solicit material, and the Trib just doesn’t have the staff for that. But, we haven’t given up. We are trying to develop other ways to help people in the community tell their own stories. CBC Canada’s “This I Believe” and the use of mobile phones in the interactive project MurMur are totally inspiring for us and we hope to co-op some of those ideas.

OJR: Any sense of how much residents in the heavier-homicide zones are interacting with the site?

KN & SC: Without having much to back this up except personal responses we get, we feel it is mainly the residents from the flat lands (crime rich areas) are the ones who are using our site, they are the ones most directly effected by violence and therefore have more interest in crime related stories especially ones that tell stories of hope or solutions. For example, we have been asked by many schools in the flat lands to come speak to their class because they have been using it as a tool in the class, we have yet been asked by a school in an area where violence is not a common thing.

OJR: What is next for the site? Any significant new features on deck?

KN: We are currently reworking the “Risk Factors” section of the site. While Kathleen Kirkwood was working with the Alameda County Health to gather the information on the risk factors, they encouraged her to also look at the resilience factors — the factors that help young people thrive despite living in potential harmful environments. We all loved this idea, but there wasn’t time to explore it before the launch.

Working with several community centers in Oakland, we recently had the opportunity to conduct video interviews with youth talking about what has helped them and their peers thrive despite some of the obstacles they face. It was one of the best experiences we had doing this project. The component launches at the end of the month so please check it out.

SC: I think for us the next step would be find ways to connect to low-income residents who may not have a computer. We think one way would be enabling interaction to our site with a cell phone. Also, finding funding to put kiosks in public libraries would be nice as well. As far as new features, not much except the resilience feature that Katy mentions, and maybe give the site a little makeover.

OJR: Finally, what advice would you offer online journalists at other news organizations who wanted to create a project with similar impact?

SC: I would say first of all not to be afraid to fail. The whole time we were creating this project we kept telling everyone that we could do this but there were a lot of times Katy and I had no idea what we were doing. It was a big leap for us. Other tips would be to talk to as many people as you can about the idea to help flush it out. Get out of the newsroom and into the community. As far as building the project, we benefited greatly from so many people out there sharing their expertise online. It is truly amazing, the generosity of the web programming world.

KN: Rough out your concept—how you think the story should be told—then go out and meet with organizations and individuals working in the community. Listen to their struggles and the stories they would like to learn about. Find out what information/tools they could use. Then go for it!

KN & SC: We would recommend groups with limited resources take a look at online services and open source software that could help streamline the process, such as:

  • Vuvox
  • Elgg
  • Javascript & PHP libraries like CakePHP & JQuery
  • Content Managment System or frameworks like WordPress, Drupal, Django, etc…
  • Web services with API’s like Yahoo Maps, Zoho, Picnik, etc…

  • Cooperation, not conflict, the goal at the Networked Journalism Summit

    Sometimes the relationship between corporate and independent media seems like a stubborn parent-teenager relationship. Each side is certain it has all the right answers, and even more convinced that the other is utterly clueless about, well, everything. Meanwhile, resentment builds, resulting in… the silent treatment.

    Many industry pragmatists have sought an intervention, the latest among them The City University of New York Graduate School of Journalism. When its Networked Journalism Summit convened in New York on Oct. 10, the goal, as event co-organizer David Cohn described it, was action. Short on analysis; big on future plans. That was made clear in advance to each of the roughly 180 invitees, so when they arrived for the all-day event, it was all business; and when they left, all execution.

    Take conference attendee GroundReport.com. A few days ago, the citizen journalism portal launched Groups, a minipublication functionality allowing anyone to create their own free, customized digital publication. Founder Rachel Sterne arrived at the summit with the nascent idea in her back pocket. It matured in an afternoon break-out and came to fruition just one week later.

    Cohn answered additional questions from OJR about the first installment:

    OJR: So where did the idea for this conference come from?

    David Cohn: Jeff Jarvis is the real man behind the formation of the event. He applied for a MacArthur grant and with that money he is going to organize at least three of these conferences. This was the first. The second will probably be smaller and focus on new business models.

    OJR: So what was the main idea behind this first one?

    Cohn: Next Steps. If this conference had been organized a few years ago, the idea probably would have been to proselytize networked journalism and to try to spread the word to new people. As things are, however, citizen journalism doesn’t need to be touted as something that news organizations need to get hip to. They already know that now. With that in mind, this conference was about next steps. What does networked journalism need in order to become more mainstream and accepted. What do news organizations need in order to really adopt this. What are the best practices and principles of networked journalism?

    OJR: Did you have any particular areas of curiosity in mind when you put this together? Or was the idea just to throw a bunch of folks from different walks of journalism in a room and see what comes out of it?

    Cohn: A little bit of both. The first third of the day was about sharing best pracitices of networked journalism. What has already been learned? So we tried to gather the best practitioners. This included hyperlocal champions like Debie Galant from Baristanet and Vice President of News at Gannett Jenifer Carol (as Gannett is also doing interesting work in networked journalism). We tried to touch on various subjects, from video to revenue — who is doing ground-breaking work? We identified those people and did brief write-ups on them. The idea was for those leaders of networked journalism to share what they have learned.

    That was the first third of the day. The other 2/3rds was a bit more of what you described: Throw people in a room and see what comes out of it. It was a little more subtle than that; we had breakout sessions, again, in different subjects of journalism, from database journalism to covering politics. What we wanted was for people to leave with new ideas and projects.

    OJR: Sounds like it was intended to be a day of discussions and productivity rather than presentations and empty talk.

    Cohn: You are correct: The intent was for the conference to be a productive day. What we want is for people who are working on similar projects or ideas to find each other. Again, the write-ups were helpful in this. The blog continues to be helpful. If you look at http://www.newsinnovation.com right now, you’ll find a series of “What’s Next” blog posts. After the conference we asked people to write in to tell us what they will do next. The hope is that the connections that were made at the conference will continue to flourish and help people move forward. Once all these “What’s Next” posts are up. I will probably give everybody three to four months and check in to find out, once again, what is going on.

    OJR: What were the significant takeaways? Any overarching or recurring themes throughout the course of the day?

    Cohn: To be honest, I don’t know. I was running around the entire day and was never really able to sit back and appreciate what was happening. I was always trying to stay one step ahead of the crowd. When the first third of the day was wrapping up, I was trying to make sure lunch was ready—that kind of thing. I wouldn’t know if a theme came out. Takeaways: I know lots of people left with more ideas than they came with.

    OJR: In the event description, you set a “no MSM-bashing or blog-bashing” rule. Can you explain? And did they obey?

    Cohn: The idea, again, was that we don’t need to proselytize. This isn’t about arguing the merits of networked journalism and complaining about the MSM. It is also not a gripe session for the MSM to complain about bloggers taking all their readers. Both types were in attendance and the reason we invited both was so that they could work on projects together in the future; not as a session for people to rag on each other. Fortunately the gong did not need to be brought out. I only threatened to bring it out once, as did Jeff Jarvis. To my knowledge there was no MSM- or blog-bashing.

    OJR: You also had everyone show up with an advance write-up of their work as a conversation starter. How did that go over?

    Cohn: It went well. We collected about 64 or so of these write-ups. That is about one-third of the entire guest list. About 20 of those were done by me over the phone. The other 40 or so were done via email with a generic questionnaire. I think they proved to be very valuable—both for the conference and for networked journalism in particular. This is an emerging art. It is not a science. Different artists have different techniques and experiences. Those write-ups are a collection of 64 different artists explaining what it is that they do in networked journalism. Do I think all the guests read all 64 interviews? Of course not. But I do know guests browsed the list of names and looked for people that they were already curious about. Small connections might have been made through the write-ups, it was an excuse for people to approach each other: “Hey, I read they you were doing X,Y and Z. Tell me more about it.”

    OJR: Those write-ups are appearing on the Newsinnovation.com blog. What is the role of that blog, and who are your readers there? Was it specifically built around the summit?

    Cohn: The blog was built for the summit, and will be used for the other summits too. Again, the summit was the main event, but we hope that people who came continue to network with each other. Readers: I don’t know who they are. I hope it’s a little of everyone.

    OJR: What’s next for this project? Any plans for follow-up events?

    Cohn: Two more of these conferences — and checking in on people who tell us what they are going to do next.

    Bloggers organize international day of support for Burmese freedom

    As the world awaits the U.N. briefing on this week’s peace talks in Myanmar, the chaos and violence on the ground ensues. The rising death toll is estimated in the hundreds, with injuries and arrests mounting by the day. But anyone outside the country’s borders is virtually in the dark as to how the situation is now unfolding.

    That was not the case this time last week.

    On Friday, Sept. 28, the Myanmar government effectively shut down all cell-phone and Internet communication, stunting a citizen-journalism movement that had itself drawn international recognition.

    The state-controlled media in Myanmar has been tight-lipped, to say the least. Communication with international news organizations has been spotty, and soldiers continue to turn reporters away at the borders. The message has been clear: “Nothing to see here.”

    But armed with cell phones, cameras and laptops, common citizens and protesters stepped in to expose the conflict in real time. Some ran blogs of their own. Many dispatched pictures and videos of police violence to off-shore bloggers and news sites. Either way, they loosened the government’s chokehold on communication.

    Now, with the ebb and flow of information from within at a standstill, the offshore sites are left to sustain awareness. A brand-new site out of Germany, Free-Burma.org, calls on bloggers around the world to post a “Free Burma” awareness graphic on any posts today, Oct. 4. Organizer Philipp Hausser talked to us about “International Bloggers’ Day For Burma” and the impact of Myanmar’s citizen-journalist phenomenon.

    Online Journalism Review: First off, can you tell me a little about the history of your site?

    Phillip Hausser: The original idea came from a Blogger in Italy. The well-known German blogger Robert Basic had an idea “to do something” and asked what could be done. Many comments; different opinions. Everything was discussed in a Wiki and the idea of an international blogger day was born.

    Christian Hahn [Hausser's partner] and I found that this was a good idea to show the people in Burma our solidarity for their peaceful protests. To help the action to get better organized (the wiki was and is still very unorganized) we decided overnight to set up the domain and build a website.

    OJR: And how have results been so far?

    Hausser: It’s now in seven different languages, with an overwhelming success: Over 10,000 visitors came just in the first 24 hours, and over 30,000 visitors to date. The site [launched] Sunday.

    The reason for so many visitors is a good working network. People spread the message within ours around the globe and many people joined.

    And yes, the support was great! We reached many, many people in almost every country and had media coverage around the globe – all in 4 days.

    Let’s see what happens on Oct. 4.

    OJR: What sort of goals have you set for the site?

    Hausser: The situation in Burma is getting more and more quiet in the last days; not because of a better situation, but because the military is trying to avoid any outgoing communication.

    We want to keep this “burning topic” on top in the media. The bloody pictures are getting fewer every day, and the media are losing their interest to report about the topic. We want so set a peaceful sign to keep it on peoples’ minds.

    OJR: Do you have a sense of how effective the government shutdown of Internet and cell-phone lines has been? How long did it take to figure out that outside communications had been halted?

    Hausser: We/the bloggers realized very quickly that there was no more connection to Burma. Hours later the media spread the news. And yes, it was effective. Most blogs about Burma are written outside Burma (see our blog list on f-b.org). the blogs inside stopped refreshing and the remaining bloggers are afraid for their lives. They have taken pictures of themselves down from their blogs so the government can’t find them. Everybody there is in danger.

    OJR: What are citizen journalists in Myanmar doing now to get information out of the country? Have they been able to get around the government barriers? If so, how?

    Hausser: Not sure. But we know that it is not easy. They talk/write less about Burma every day. We try to stop that.

    OJR: How are the off-shore blogs and sites like yours dealing with the block of information flow?

    Hausser: To be honest, currently I’m more and more dealing with interviews and communication than working for the page. The response is overwhelming, more than we ever expected.

    OJR: You’ve really tried to spread the word with Wiki, Digg, Facebook, Flickr, etc. How successful have those social media tools been in spreading awareness?

    Hausser: Facebook is not directly connected with us, but they are promoting the action. Top referrers are Stumbleupon and ko-htike.blogspot.com. We used Flickr for the graphics collection, and the wiki as a democratic element to collect ideas, translations and everything else.

    OJR: Finally, do you have a particular, numeric goal in mind for the big Burma blog day on Oct. 4?

    Hausser: No, nothing. The visitor counter is growing very rapidly, as are subscriptions (see the news page for updates). But like I said: This is more than we ever expected, and no one knows what’s going on today/tomorrow. But I’m sure it will be a lot!