<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Online Journalism Review&#187; Karl-Erik Stromsta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ojr.org/author/stromsta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ojr.org</link>
	<description>Focusing on the future of digital journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 03:17:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The evolution of Visual Editors</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/050915stromsta/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=050915stromsta</link>
		<comments>http://www.ojr.org/050915stromsta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 14:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl-Erik Stromsta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the evanescent world of the Internet, just because something is working well today doesn’t mean it will still be working tomorrow, said VisualEditors.com founder Robb Montgomery. And he should know. Montgomery, who is also news design editor for the Chicago Sun-Times, launched Visual Editors in 2004 as a forum for newspaper designers to liaise [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the evanescent world of the Internet, just because something is working well today doesn’t mean it will still be working tomorrow, said <a href="http://visualeditors.com/mx/">VisualEditors.com</a> founder Robb Montgomery.</p>
<p>And he should know.</p>
<p>Montgomery, who is also news design editor for the <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/index/">Chicago Sun-Times</a>, launched Visual Editors in 2004 as a forum for newspaper designers to liaise and wax analytical about everything from overbearing editors to new trends in design.</p>
<p>But as with many things on the Web, what started as something simple didn’t end up that way.</p>
<p>&#8220;It’s incredible,&#8221; Montgomery said. &#8220;It feels like we just launched (Visual Editors) and we’re already getting more than 1 million page views a month.&#8221;</p>
<p>In addition to an &#8220;amazingly lively&#8221; job section, and the ability for members to upload their designs and receive instant feedback, VizEd has also recently embraced what Montgomery says so many mainstream newspapers have balked at: podcasting.</p>
<p>With the help of a few great guests – including Deborah Douglas of Fluff magazine and Matt Mansfield of the <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/">San Jose Mercury News</a> – VizEd’s podcasts were downloaded more than 26,000 times in the first 30 days alone.</p>
<p>All that traffic necessitated a move to a larger, and much more costly, server.</p>
<p>And this constant evolution, Mongomery said, is the only way for a Web site to get – and stay – ahead.</p>
<p>&#8220;I’m always tinkering with my own limits. It’s about always changing, always getting better. It’s about thinking: How can I make the site more intuitive – more informative? I had to learn a whole new set of skills just to get these podcasts to play.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, it wasn’t enough to simply get the podcasts up and running; Visual Editors offers five different ways for members to play them.</p>
<p>&#8220;Why shouldn’t we offer our members every available format?” he asked. “Why make it hard on people? People just don’t want to wait around while newspapers figure all this technology out.&#8221;</p>
<p>But despite being willing to grapple with the bells and whistles, Montgomery is ultimately about the basics: &#8220;In the end, we want an open and honest discussion about newspaper design.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ojr.org/050915stromsta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Al Gore to headline We Media conference</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/050908stromsta/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=050908stromsta</link>
		<comments>http://www.ojr.org/050908stromsta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 13:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl-Erik Stromsta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Vice President Al Gore will be the keynote speaker at The Media Center’s October 5 We Media conference in New York City. The day-long event will gather leading media analysts to discuss the Internet’s effects on mass collaboration, including lectures on citizen journalism, activism and democracy, the business of collaboration, and media watching. Hosted [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Vice President Al Gore will be the keynote speaker at The Media Center’s October 5 <a href="http://www.mediacenter.org/wemedia05/">We Media</a> conference in New York City.</p>
<p>The day-long event will gather leading media analysts to discuss the Internet’s effects on mass collaboration, including lectures on citizen journalism, activism and democracy, the business of collaboration, and media watching.</p>
<p>Hosted by the <a href="http://ap.org/">Associated Press</a> at its world headquarters, the symposium will also feature speakers Craig Newmark of <a href="http://www.craigslist.org/">craigslist.org</a>; CBS Digital Media President Larry Kramer; and <a href="http://nytimes.com/">New York Times</a> columnist Nicholas Kristof.</p>
<p>The Media Center is a non-profit think tank affiliated with the <a href="http://www.americanpressinstitute.org/">American Press Institute</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ojr.org/050908stromsta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google ads go &#039;back to the future&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/google-ads-go-back-to-the-future/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google-ads-go-back-to-the-future</link>
		<comments>http://www.ojr.org/google-ads-go-back-to-the-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 15:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl-Erik Stromsta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Internet wunderkind Google has begun selling advertisements in the last place anyone expected: in printed publications, reports the New York Times. The Silicon Valley-based company, which has made billions of dollars selling short text-based ads online, has befuddled advertisers and publishers alike by purchasing ad space in PC Magazine and Maximum PC and then selling [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Internet wunderkind <a href="http://www.google.com/">Google</a> has begun selling advertisements in the last place anyone expected: in printed publications, reports the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/01/technology/01google.html">New York Times</a>.</p>
<p>The Silicon Valley-based company, which has made billions of dollars selling short text-based ads online, has befuddled advertisers and publishers alike by purchasing ad space in <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/">PC Magazine</a> and <a href="http://www.maximumpc.com/">Maximum PC</a> and then selling spots to smaller companies.</p>
<p>According to the NYTimes, this move resembles ad brokering, a practice shunned by many major publishers.</p>
<p>At a time when most print advertisers are looking to move online, the jump from the Internet to the printed page &#8220;&#8216;really is back to the future,&#8217;&#8221; said <a href="http://www2.standardandpoors.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=sp/Page/HomePg&#038;r=1&#038;l=EN&#038;b=10">Standard &#038; Poor’s</a> analyst Scott Kessler to the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-google1sep01,0,7699893.story?coll=la-home-business">Los Angeles Times</a>.</p>
<p>Jason Young, president of Internet publishing for <a href="http://www.ziffdavis.com/">Ziff Davis Media Inc.</a>, told the LATimes Google’s new program gives print advertisers some much needed encouragement.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8216;It’s a leading entity in the online world saying that print is really an important solution for marketers,&#8217;&#8221; Young said.</p>
<p>Not everyone is thrilled with the news, however. Some publishers that have traditionally sold ads directly to their clients are wary of Google becoming an all-too-powerful middleman.</p>
<p>Google would not elaborate on its motives except to say the program was a test, according to the NYTimes. The NYTimes also reported that Google executives have said in the past that they &#8220;see their rapidly growing online advertising business extending to other media forms.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ojr.org/google-ads-go-back-to-the-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quebecor converges Ontario media properties</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/050830stromsta/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=050830stromsta</link>
		<comments>http://www.ojr.org/050830stromsta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl-Erik Stromsta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via Yahoo.news: Canadian communications giant Quebecor, Inc. has announced plans to bring its Ontario-based media divisions under a single roof. In order to streamline operations and boost revenue, Quebecor will consolidate the tabloid Toronto Sun, the free daily newspaper 24 Hours, Sun TV and Internet portal canoe.ca. The consolidation, set to cost the company $110 [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&#038;u=/cpress/20050829/ca_pr_on_me/craft_quebecor_1">Yahoo.news</a>: Canadian communications giant Quebecor, Inc. has <a href="http://www.quebecorworldinc.com/en/news/press/article.php?newsId=972">announced</a> plans to bring its Ontario-based media divisions under a single roof.</p>
<p>In order to streamline operations and boost revenue, Quebecor will consolidate the tabloid <a href="http://www.torontosun.com">Toronto Sun</a>, the free daily newspaper <a href="http://toronto.24hrs.ca/">24 Hours</a>, <a href="http://suntv.canoe.ca/">Sun TV</a> and Internet portal <a href="http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeClassic/home.html">canoe.ca</a>.  The consolidation, set to cost the company $110 million, will also result in the loss of 120 jobs.</p>
<p>Quebecor Inc. CEO Pierre Karl Peladeau said he hopes for the same success in Ontario that Quebecor has had in Montreal, where the company also converged its media properties.</p>
<p>Luc Lavoie, Quebecor&#8217;s executive vice-president of corporate affairs, said he envisions a central news desk that will employ its personnel &#8220;in all four pillars of the operation.&#8221;</p>
<p>Lavoie&#8217;s vision includes Sun columnists producing blogs and appearing on Sun TV in debate-type shows like CNN&#8217;s Crossfire, according to Yahoo News.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8216;People under 40 don&#8217;t look for news in the same way people of my age, in their 50s, do or used to,&#8217;&#8221; Lavoie said. &#8220;&#8216;They go to the Internet, they go to the TV . . . You have to catch them where they are.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>Ryerson University journalism program chair Paul Knox was skeptical about the convergence model, stating that it has yielded mixed results in both Canada and the U.S.</p>
<p>Knox added that writing a print article requires different skills than writing a script for broadcast.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8216;It all depends how much they are willing to invest in human resources and skills in the talent that you would need to pull this off,&#8217;&#8221; Knox said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ojr.org/050830stromsta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The bunny goes digital</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/050825stromsta/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=050825stromsta</link>
		<comments>http://www.ojr.org/050825stromsta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl-Erik Stromsta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Reuters: Playboy Enterprises has announced plans to begin publishing an online edition of its infamous magazine later this year. Stricken with declining ad sales and flat circulation numbers, Playboy’s publishing arm recently posted a second-quarter loss of $2.3 million. Playboy Chief Executive Christie Hefner – daughter of founder Hugh Hefner – said the company [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=internetNews&#038;storyID=2005-08-24T191213Z_01_HAR468172_RTRIDST_0_NET-MEDIA-PLAYBOY-DC.XML">Reuters:</a> Playboy Enterprises has announced plans to begin publishing an online edition of its infamous magazine later this year. Stricken with declining ad sales and flat circulation numbers, Playboy’s publishing arm recently posted a second-quarter loss of $2.3 million.</p>
<p>Playboy Chief Executive Christie Hefner – daughter of founder Hugh Hefner – said the company was responding to two conspicuous trends. &#8220;&#8216;One is more and more consumers are getting information and entertainment online, and the other is more and more advertising dollars are going online.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>Beginning September 13, curious readers will be able to download an <a href="http://www.playboy.com/playboydigital/">electronic version</a> of the print edition for the same price they would pay at the newsstand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ojr.org/050825stromsta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bloggers poll-vault over online surveys</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/050823stromsta2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=050823stromsta2</link>
		<comments>http://www.ojr.org/050823stromsta2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl-Erik Stromsta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From The Times-Herald: Blogs were once credited with providing a podium to those otherwise short in political stature. Now some have been accused of building that podium a bit too tall. Over the weekend, several blogs beseeched their readers to vote multiple times in online opinion polls regarding anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan. Both The Reporter [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.timesheraldonline.com/ci_2965679">The Times-Herald</a>: Blogs were once credited with providing a podium to those otherwise short in political stature. Now some have been accused of building that podium a bit too tall.</p>
<p>Over the weekend, several blogs beseeched their readers to vote multiple times in online opinion polls regarding anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan.</p>
<p>Both <a href="http://www.thereporter.com">The Reporter</a> and <a href="http://timesheraldonline.com">The Times-Herald</a> said that by posting instructions on how to bypass the one-vote-per-person system, the bloggers distorted the results of the polls.</p>
<p>As a result of the blogging frenzy, thereporter.com – which normally receives just 12,000 hits a day – garnered more than 93,000 votes.</p>
<p>While many see the voting hijinks as victimless, others are concerned that the incident highlights the increasing power of blogs to sway politics and the mainstream media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ojr.org/050823stromsta2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The small screen just got smaller</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/050823stromsta/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=050823stromsta</link>
		<comments>http://www.ojr.org/050823stromsta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl-Erik Stromsta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From The Globe and Mail: With some analysts predicting an impending explosion of ad revenue on the Web, the day has come when television networks can no longer afford to be wallflowers at the Internet block party. Ultimately, the impetus for moving news content online has been the almighty greenback: Last year alone, online advertising [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.globetechnology.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20050823.wxrwebnews23/BNStory/Technology/ ">The Globe and Mail:</a> With some analysts predicting an impending explosion of ad revenue on the Web, the day has come when television networks can no longer afford to be wallflowers at the Internet block party.</p>
<p>Ultimately, the impetus for moving news content online has been the almighty greenback: Last year alone, online advertising grew by a third.</p>
<p>But with many challenges remaining – mostly technological and financial in nature – the transition has been smoother for some news outlets than for others. Sports news, with its short highlight clips, is particularly well-suited for the Web, according to <a href="http://www.ctv.ca/">Canadian Television Network</a> sports chief Mike Day.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you want to watch football segments, you don&#8217;t have to sit through hockey,” Day said.</p>
<p>However, Robert Niles, <a href="http://www.www.ojr.org">Online Journalism Review</a> editor in chief, said the potential for some media outlets to avoid the Internet remains, but they will have to seriously consider their market.</p>
<p>&#8220;Some companies will survive, but they&#8217;ll become more of a niche outfit &#8211; you&#8217;re still going to have an audience, but it&#8217;ll be a smaller audience,&#8221; Niles said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ojr.org/050823stromsta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quality, not quantity, will dictate new Google news</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/050429stromsta/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=050429stromsta</link>
		<comments>http://www.ojr.org/050429stromsta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl-Erik Stromsta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has filed patents for a new system of compiling the day’s news, reports New Scientist. Currently the search-engine giant selects news stories based solely on their date and relevance to search terms. Under the new system, Google will keep tabs on the track record and credibility of all news sources around the globe, including [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.google.com/">Google</a> has filed patents for a new system of compiling the day’s news, reports <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18624975.900">New Scientist</a>. Currently the search-engine giant selects news stories based solely on their date and relevance to search terms. Under the new system, Google will keep tabs on the track record and credibility of all news sources around the globe, including the number of stories filed by each source, their average story lengths and even how long they have been in business. Thus, reputable sources such as <a href=http://www.cnn.com/>CNN</a> or the <a href=http://news.bbc.co.uk/>BBC</a> will normally be included on the first page of results, even if they have not posted the newest story on a topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ojr.org/050429stromsta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Street Journal online out-earns print version</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/050415stromsta/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=050415stromsta</link>
		<comments>http://www.ojr.org/050415stromsta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2005 11:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl-Erik Stromsta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last quarter, the online version of The Wall Street Journal for the first time earned more money than the flagship print version, reports the New York Post. Financial problems, including drops in advertising revenue, have plagued the WSJ’s parent Dow Jones &#038; Co. lately. &#8220;Print publishing is not a profitable business for Dow Jones anymore,&#8221; [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last quarter, the online version of <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/us">The Wall Street Journal</a> for the first time earned more money than the flagship print version, reports the <a href="http://nypost.com/business/42637.htm">New York Post</a>. Financial problems, including drops in advertising revenue, have plagued the WSJ’s parent <a href="http://dowjones.com/">Dow Jones &#038; Co.</a> lately. &#8220;Print publishing is not a profitable business for Dow Jones anymore,&#8221; said <a href="http://matrixusa.com/">Matrix USA</a> analyst Seth Feinseth. As such, Wall Street Journal CEO Peter Kann has locked his gaze on the online version – which boasts 731,000 subscribers – as the way toward future growth. A year’s subscription to the Wall Street Journal Online is $84, compared with around $356 for the print version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ojr.org/050415stromsta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Survey: Americans skeptical about bloggers&#039; rights</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/survey-americans-skeptical-about-bloggers-rights/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=survey-americans-skeptical-about-bloggers-rights</link>
		<comments>http://www.ojr.org/survey-americans-skeptical-about-bloggers-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2005 12:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl-Erik Stromsta</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via CNET: Eighty percent of Americans believe that bloggers should not have the right to publish personal information about other people, according to a survey conducted by Hostway. Moreover, 72 percent of those polled felt that such censorship should extend to information about celebrities, and 68 percent to elected and appointed government officials. Just over [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via <a href="http://news.com.com/Blog+censorship+gains+support/2100-1028_3-5670096.html">CNET</a>: Eighty percent of Americans believe that bloggers should not have the right to publish personal information about other people, according to a survey conducted by <a href="http://www.hostway.com/">Hostway</a>. Moreover, 72 percent of those polled felt that such censorship should extend to information about celebrities, and 68 percent to elected and appointed government officials. Just over half of the 2,500 people surveyed said bloggers should be given the same free speech protections as journalists, and nearly 40 percent said they found blogs &#8220;less credible&#8221; than newspaper articles. Aside from pervasive skepticism about blogging, the survey also revealed that most Americans still aren’t citizens of the blogosphere. More than two-thirds of those polled had either never visited a blog or never heard of them before the survey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ojr.org/survey-americans-skeptical-about-bloggers-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>