The small screen just got smaller

From The Globe and Mail: With some analysts predicting an impending explosion of ad revenue on the Web, the day has come when television networks can no longer afford to be wallflowers at the Internet block party.

Ultimately, the impetus for moving news content online has been the almighty greenback: Last year alone, online advertising grew by a third.

But with many challenges remaining – mostly technological and financial in nature – the transition has been smoother for some news outlets than for others. Sports news, with its short highlight clips, is particularly well-suited for the Web, according to Canadian Television Network sports chief Mike Day.

“If you want to watch football segments, you don’t have to sit through hockey,” Day said.

However, Robert Niles, Online Journalism Review editor in chief, said the potential for some media outlets to avoid the Internet remains, but they will have to seriously consider their market.

“Some companies will survive, but they’ll become more of a niche outfit – you’re still going to have an audience, but it’ll be a smaller audience,” Niles said.

Quality, not quantity, will dictate new Google news

Google has filed patents for a new system of compiling the day’s news, reports New Scientist. Currently the search-engine giant selects news stories based solely on their date and relevance to search terms. Under the new system, Google will keep tabs on the track record and credibility of all news sources around the globe, including the number of stories filed by each source, their average story lengths and even how long they have been in business. Thus, reputable sources such as CNN or the BBC will normally be included on the first page of results, even if they have not posted the newest story on a topic.

Wall Street Journal online out-earns print version

Last quarter, the online version of The Wall Street Journal for the first time earned more money than the flagship print version, reports the New York Post. Financial problems, including drops in advertising revenue, have plagued the WSJ’s parent Dow Jones & Co. lately. “Print publishing is not a profitable business for Dow Jones anymore,” said Matrix USA analyst Seth Feinseth. As such, Wall Street Journal CEO Peter Kann has locked his gaze on the online version – which boasts 731,000 subscribers – as the way toward future growth. A year’s subscription to the Wall Street Journal Online is $84, compared with around $356 for the print version.