<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#039;t say Twitter or Facebook on French TV, radio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ojr.org/dont-say-twitter-or-facebook-on-french-tv-radio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ojr.org/dont-say-twitter-or-facebook-on-french-tv-radio/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dont-say-twitter-or-facebook-on-french-tv-radio</link>
	<description>Focusing on the future of digital journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:43:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance Mahoney</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/dont-say-twitter-or-facebook-on-french-tv-radio/#comment-2695</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance Mahoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 08:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1981#comment-2695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think rules like this are kind of ridiculous.  Government officials over there in France probabaly spent months drafting and preparing this new law, and the sole purpose is to reduce the &quot;free advertising&quot; for Twitter and Facebook?

Those brands have moved from being a brand name to being a verb almost (like &quot;Google it&quot; has become).

Do they prevent anchors from using other such brand names that have become commonplace in language?  Off the top of my head I can think of Band-Aids, Xerox, and Kleenex as brands that fit this bill.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think rules like this are kind of ridiculous.  Government officials over there in France probabaly spent months drafting and preparing this new law, and the sole purpose is to reduce the &#8220;free advertising&#8221; for Twitter and Facebook?</p>
<p>Those brands have moved from being a brand name to being a verb almost (like &#8220;Google it&#8221; has become).</p>
<p>Do they prevent anchors from using other such brand names that have become commonplace in language?  Off the top of my head I can think of Band-Aids, Xerox, and Kleenex as brands that fit this bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>