<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#039;s up to Congress now to protect Net Neutrality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ojr.org/its-up-to-congress-now-to-protect-net-neutrality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ojr.org/its-up-to-congress-now-to-protect-net-neutrality/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=its-up-to-congress-now-to-protect-net-neutrality</link>
	<description>Focusing on the future of digital journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:43:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Aylmer-Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/its-up-to-congress-now-to-protect-net-neutrality/#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Aylmer-Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 01:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1351#comment-936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If this were to happen in the UK I would hope that the free market would dictate that unrestricted browsing would be a differentiating factor in allowing customers to choose which ISP to use.
Why wouldn&#039;t this happen in the USA?

I have a choice of dozens of ISPs in north Surrey, not just 3 or 4, and I&#039;m pretty sure there would always be a few that offered net neutrality as a distinguising factor/USP if this sort of thing took off here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this were to happen in the UK I would hope that the free market would dictate that unrestricted browsing would be a differentiating factor in allowing customers to choose which ISP to use.<br />
Why wouldn&#8217;t this happen in the USA?</p>
<p>I have a choice of dozens of ISPs in north Surrey, not just 3 or 4, and I&#8217;m pretty sure there would always be a few that offered net neutrality as a distinguising factor/USP if this sort of thing took off here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunil Bajpai</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/its-up-to-congress-now-to-protect-net-neutrality/#comment-935</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunil Bajpai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 02:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1351#comment-935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bandwidth cost is zero for millions of bloggers. Who pays?

Those who derive economic benefit from the bloggers&#039; outpourings. They, not  legislation or government, would best sustain the &quot;explosion in people-powered media&quot;.

More at http://tinyurl.com/2loaf6]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bandwidth cost is zero for millions of bloggers. Who pays?</p>
<p>Those who derive economic benefit from the bloggers&#8217; outpourings. They, not  legislation or government, would best sustain the &#8220;explosion in people-powered media&#8221;.</p>
<p>More at <a href="http://tinyurl.com/2loaf6" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/2loaf6</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Boriss</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/its-up-to-congress-now-to-protect-net-neutrality/#comment-934</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Boriss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1351#comment-934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I respectfully disagree.  Completely.  Through the entire history of news, whenever governments have been able to get any degree of control over the means of communication, free speech has suffered mightily.  When the printing press was invented, governments immediately instituted licensing, prior restraint, and censorship to suppress criticism. When broadcasting was invented, governments immediately either took full ownership of it or required proof of ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I respectfully disagree.  Completely.  Through the entire history of news, whenever governments have been able to get any degree of control over the means of communication, free speech has suffered mightily.  When the printing press was invented, governments immediately instituted licensing, prior restraint, and censorship to suppress criticism. When broadcasting was invented, governments immediately either took full ownership of it or required proof of </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K.Paul Mallasch</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/its-up-to-congress-now-to-protect-net-neutrality/#comment-933</link>
		<dc:creator>K.Paul Mallasch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1351#comment-933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting rid of net neutrality is one of the only real ways I see &#039;them&#039; being able to stop the grassroots journalism movement. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting rid of net neutrality is one of the only real ways I see &#8216;them&#8217; being able to stop the grassroots journalism movement. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>