Readers' Opinions

From Jon Garfunkel on June 9, 2005 at 10:14 PM
“In my experience it is easier to teach a blogger to be a good journalist than it is to teach a journalist to be a good blogger,” Sands said, whose paper publishes 23 active online-only columns. “Bloggers understand the social network.”

I find this very hard to believe. I emailed Ken for some justification: how many has he tried to teach as both? If blogging is a folk movement which anyone can pick up-- why would it be so so hard for journalists to pick it up? Arianna Huffington and her post, Josh Marshall and his cafe, etc.

From Jon Garfunkel on June 9, 2005 at 10:54 PM
you wrote:
Pelline suggested that a “blog should capture the conversations in the newsroom that don't get published” which give additional background and perspective to the paper's coverage.

Not only that. That's already happening at the Spokesman-Review! It's interesting not because it's a blog, but because they have set very narrow mandates for these channels: Ken Paulman's Daily Briefing on the newsroom. The Q&A with the editors. The 5 reader-ombudsmen.