February 07, 2012
Edmonds News taps streaming sports events for revenue

The strategy of building news Web sites as destinations has not worked. Suggest, instead, approaches for news Web sites that will make them hubs of personal and content networks.
Instead, I suggest that the goal should be to build news Web sites that are hubs of personal and content networks. I suggest a few ways to do this, but I'm interested in hearing more.
Check out the post at:
http://www.readership.org/blog2/2007/04/build-network-not-destination.html
and weigh in here with your ideas for network-building.
As for community building, by forums, 'blogs or wiki's, all can build loyal contributors, however, it is labor intensive on the part of the hosting site.
Many news sites that have set up a forum without moderation have taken the forums back offline, due to rampant spamming and off topic comments. Any news site considering viewer/reader interaction must be prepared to actively moderate the forums. Simply installing a discussion forum and not keeping it tidy and on track invites abuse, and takes away from the purpose of public discourse. There is a difference between moderation and censorship, that is an issue that must be addressed by the individual news sites.
"Web2.0" is interactive community building, and news sites must respond to "Web2.0" by involving their viewers/readers. Sites such as MySpace, my site, and other "Web2.0" sites are growing in popularity due to the interactive nature, and news sites can learn a lot from the success of others.
Robert's observation:
"But newspapers would have a huge opportunity that MySpace is, to date, wasting by mining that undercurrent of personal communication for news leads and story ideas. Deploy reporters to identify potential stories, then use crowdsourcing to help report them.",
and Pete's:
"Simply installing a discussion forum and not keeping it tidy and on track invites abuse, and takes away from the purpose of public discourse." -
go hand-in-hand.
To set up forums or discussions and not engage with your readers is hardly interactive. We have to take an active role in bridging the gap between the newsroom and the public we purport to serve. I have gotten many breaking news tips from reader forums, entire civic initiatives have resulted from paying attention to and steering public feedback, etc - its developing that relationship that is paramount IMO.
I think its important to open up the archives as well, and also open them up for comments and discussion. its a great way to collect information or ideas if you ever have to go back and revisit an issue or a topic. I also encourage the development of readers making their own archives - we 've opened up a general local history/memories forum thats pretty popular.
I consider DIGG a social news website, not just a news website. So why don't news websites start looking at successful internet sites and learn from their success.
News websites should be the center of the users experience, they should link in, link out, and comment all over the site. But if there isn't a good user base, then users won't be as likely to comment.
Other than that, many sites need to start embracing what the internet is capable of. We need to start seeing more embedded video, audio slide shows, and photo packages. And at the same time I have seen some ugly news sites. I'm not going to make an ugly disorganized and advertisement cluttered page the huub of my internet experience. Clean it up if you want to be the center of my life!
Since Peer has the data, I have to agree with him.
Here's the central question: why do readers spend less minutes with online paper than a physical one?
And here's my simple explanation: online, there are more destinations online to jump to. Adding more links, as per the "network hub" model, simply exacerbates this. There's nothing wrong with that, but you can't pretend that this will solve the problem. Having cheaper content to look at (blogs for ~10 cents/word, or bulletin boards / comment threads) keeps readers around for longer.
If you want to measure this, propose a study comparing the minutes readers spent with TNR, The Nation, Salon, Slate, TPM, DailyKos. That would be an effective comparison. And gauging their revenues is still another fair comparison. TPM and DailyKos, while the leading blog liberal political blogs, may be barely grossing six figures.
Also, Robert, you need to answer the question I long ago posed here. It's very simple for a journalism program to do the math. How many readers have the capacity to interact everyday? Yes, people want to interact with their friends, but how do you monetize that as a news company?
Now, obviously, other factors can elicit loyalty as well: great coverage, engaging personalities on the staff, consumer advice, contests, ads, silly pictures, etc.
I guess I don't see what your question is, Jon. Are you questioning whether there is a market for reader-driven news editing, aggregation and/or coverage? I think Nielsen, et al, have proven that. How to monetize social media pageviews? Well, as more publishers move toward a "time spent" metric, social media has been shown to help that metric (I've seen it on my own sites, too). And the increased pageviews from social media creates saleable inventory as well.
The biggest problem for the traditional news industry is not on the income side, it is on the expense side. Decades of monopoly status have caused too many news organizations to forget how to compete. So they turn to ham-handed cuts instead of reengineering their firms to better produce truthful news coverage in the competitive Internet era.
Now, as I have to make clear, I'm not in the industry and I'm not an academic. But I have a sense what good research looks like.
Here is what a University professor writes: "Add all these network-building ideas together and I think a news site can increase its site traffic significantly -- attracting new audiences, making current users come back more frequently, and increasing the time spent and pages viewed per visit."
Hold on. This *is* being done by certain news sites, particular in special interest magazines. So much of new media writing is mired in the nineteen-nineties, chastising some unspecified tardy adopter. When hard research is done (Limor Peer's paper), somebody else comes along says, eh, I have my own anecdotes to make my own points.
February 07, 2012
Edmonds News taps streaming sports events for revenue
February 09, 2012
Knight News Challenge 2.0: applications open Feb. 27
February 7, 2012
You've got to know the truth to tell it
By Robert Niles
February 3, 2012
Look at the bottom, not the top, of your traffic analytics to boost your website's readership
By Robert Niles
January 31, 2012
It's not the medium - it's the market
By Robert Niles
January 27, 2012
'Think before you act' and more rules for journalists on Twitter
By Steve Fox
January 25, 2012
Is Apple's iBooks Author the right eBook creation tool for journalists?
By Robert Niles
entrepreneurial journalism
social media
revenue
management
tools
grassroots journalism
ethics
journalism education
newsroom convergence
usability
reporting
multimedia
search engine optimization
website design
newspaper blogs
discussion boards
Google
online video
writing
media law
2011
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
May
Jun.
Jul.
Aug.
Sep.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
2010
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
May
Jun.
Jul.
Aug.
Sep.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
2009
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
May
Jun.
Jul.
Aug.
Sep.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
2008
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
May
Jun.
Jul.
Aug.
Sep.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
2007
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
May
Jun.
Jul.
Aug.
Sep.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
2006
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
May
Jun.
Jul.
Aug.
Sep.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
2005
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
May
Jun.
Jul.
Aug.
Sep.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Before Oct. 2004
Business
Ethics
Mark Glaser
Stacy Kramer
Law
Spike Report
Technology
Workplace
How a 1995 court case kept the newspaper industry from competing online
You've got to know what you stand for to survive in journalism online
Readers owe nothing to publishers
How, and where, to hyperlink within a news story
Doing journalism in 2010 is an act of community organizing
Thinking about starting an online news business? Here's your start-up checklist
The four parts of an optimized online news website
How to optimize your news website for better Google AdSense revenue
The ethical journalist's guide to selling ads on a website:
Part One
Part Two
Part Three
From Robert Niles on April 20, 2007 at 11:50 AM
From my experience, the key to building audience loyalty and visitor frequency to an interactive website lies not in simply giving them the ability to react to staff coverage, but to initiate content on their own.Let readers create their own discussion threads. Let them maintain their own blogs. They them create and update wikis. Let them post photos, audio and video. Let them add events to a common calendar. Let them rate and review things. And,as importantly, create reader profile pages upon which other readers can see what they've created and learn a little about that creator. To take it to the ultimate level, allow readers to browse on multiple fields for other readers with similar interests and background, then to connect with each other through small group or one-on-one messaging.
Yes, just like MySpace and Facebook do.
But newspapers would have a huge opportunity that MySpace is, to date, wasting by mining that undercurrent of personal communication for news leads and story ideas. Deploy reporters to identify potential stories, then use crowdsourcing to help report them.
All the while, the community network is generating pageviews, ad impressions and visits at a level exponentially higher than the newspaper.com website could produce with staff-written content alone.