March 30, 2007
OJR 2007: From MySpace to your space
By Sarah Colombo
No comments | 
Archive Link
OJR participants debated anonymous versus sourced reader comments, as well as ways to engage users into joining an online community of readers.
Ask an interesting, or better yet, proactive question and you're likely to introduce interesting user-generated content. But how do you keep your comments above board and free from spam infiltration?
In the session, moderated by dot-com journalist and author Janine Warner, participants debated whether readers posting content to websites should be required to do so under their real names.
When veteran journalist Mack Reed launched LAVoice.org, he required names to post stories but left comments open. "It helped to keep people honest if they were posting under their real name," he says. "The ones that ignored the rule are the ones who came there to cause trouble."
OJR editor Robert Niles introduced an important distinction in the degrees of anonymity, especially to guard against impersonation.
"There’s a difference between anonymity to your reader and anonymity to you as the publisher," he says.
"One of the things I always want to make sure I’m doing on my sites if someone has a real reason to be anonymous, I want to give them a way to contact me. As publishers, I want to make real sure we’re guarding against impersonation."
Niles urges publishers to allow users to create their own publishing space on news websites, instead of limiting readers to commenting on staff-produced stories.
"I hate to use an old buzzword bingo term, but when you let readers initiate content on your website through blogs and discussion boards, instead of reacting to it through comments, you make the site far more sticky, and elicit much more loyalty to your site."
More about:
Comments (0) • 
Email to a friend
Responses via 
Technorati • 
Google Blog Search
Share on 
del.icio.us • 
Digg
This article has been archived and is no longer accepting comments.
RSS Feed
