<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making media social: news as user experience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ojr.org/p1723/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ojr.org/p1723/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=p1723</link>
	<description>Focusing on the future of digital journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:43:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth Chadwick</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/p1723/#comment-1855</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Chadwick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 02:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1723#comment-1855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a businessman and am considering pulling all my newspaper and magazine based advertising and advertising solely online]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a businessman and am considering pulling all my newspaper and magazine based advertising and advertising solely online</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/p1723/#comment-1854</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 03:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1723#comment-1854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it is breaking into two distinct streams - the commentary from enthusiasts (&quot;experts&quot;, if you like, but I&#039;m not crazy on that term) and, secondly, the noisemakers/spammers.
As a former national newspaper journlist, who left due to the ethics and disninvestment in the sector to puruse solo commercial opportunities, I for one think it is no bad thing that the advertising-driven monopoly on journlism is being dismantled. It is up to all of us who are interested in sites like this, without me tryng to sound pi, to try to ensure that the quality of what we can create in seconds and isolation online would pass muster against terrestrial peer review.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is breaking into two distinct streams &#8211; the commentary from enthusiasts (&#8220;experts&#8221;, if you like, but I&#8217;m not crazy on that term) and, secondly, the noisemakers/spammers.<br />
As a former national newspaper journlist, who left due to the ethics and disninvestment in the sector to puruse solo commercial opportunities, I for one think it is no bad thing that the advertising-driven monopoly on journlism is being dismantled. It is up to all of us who are interested in sites like this, without me tryng to sound pi, to try to ensure that the quality of what we can create in seconds and isolation online would pass muster against terrestrial peer review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Royal</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/p1723/#comment-1853</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Royal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 07:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1723#comment-1853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I certainly agree with the commenter above. Although my students don&#039;t tend to read newspapers or watch news broadcasts, they are very well informed. I think that people are engaging with news and information more than ever. There are so many opportunities to seek information, and contribute to it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly agree with the commenter above. Although my students don&#8217;t tend to read newspapers or watch news broadcasts, they are very well informed. I think that people are engaging with news and information more than ever. There are so many opportunities to seek information, and contribute to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 173.30.131.195</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/p1723/#comment-1850</link>
		<dc:creator>173.30.131.195</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 11:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1723#comment-1850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I teach at the Missouri School of Journalism and work at Newsy.com, a new online video global news site.

Agree with you completely that journalism is not dying it is just taking new forms. When I ask my class (all under the age of 30) how many of them have bought a newspaper or watched the evening news - no hands go up.

This is alarming to some but ask them about current events, and they are completely informed. They learn about events through Twitter and Digg - this next generation believes &quot;that if a story is important enough, it will find them.&quot;

That&#039;s the challenge and opportunity for original content providers.



]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I teach at the Missouri School of Journalism and work at Newsy.com, a new online video global news site.</p>
<p>Agree with you completely that journalism is not dying it is just taking new forms. When I ask my class (all under the age of 30) how many of them have bought a newspaper or watched the evening news &#8211; no hands go up.</p>
<p>This is alarming to some but ask them about current events, and they are completely informed. They learn about events through Twitter and Digg &#8211; this next generation believes &#8220;that if a story is important enough, it will find them.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the challenge and opportunity for original content providers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>