Comments on: Online Journalism or Journalism Online? There is a difference http://www.ojr.org/p1885/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=p1885 Focusing on the future of digital journalism Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:43:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: John Reen http://www.ojr.org/p1885/#comment-2424 John Reen Fri, 17 Sep 2010 05:41:39 +0000 http://www.ojr.org/?p=1885#comment-2424 Your point speaks to the reason why many don’t think the e-book are working. Perhaps hundreds of pages of text blocks belong inside stacks of flippable pages

]]> By: 71.75.229.254 http://www.ojr.org/p1885/#comment-2423 71.75.229.254 Wed, 15 Sep 2010 09:25:57 +0000 http://www.ojr.org/?p=1885#comment-2423 Good article and good delineation between the two.

You touch on news that sometimes gets its first exposure through Twitter or YouTube. Many in my industry call that “citizen journalism,” which is a misnomer since there’s no editorial accountability. I prefer the term “citizen broadcasting.” I wrote about the pros and cons of Citizen Broadcasting in a recent blog post, in case you are interested: http://www.jamesjdonnelly.com/2010/09/pros-and-cons-of-%e2%80%9ccitizen-broadcasting%e2%80%9d/

]]> By: Lisa Rau http://www.ojr.org/p1885/#comment-2422 Lisa Rau Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:36:19 +0000 http://www.ojr.org/?p=1885#comment-2422 Your point speaks to the reason why many don’t think the e-book are working. Perhaps hundreds of pages of text blocks belong inside stacks of flippable pages. But… when images, sound, video, links, and interactive/streaming features become a staple of e-books, I’m all aboard! True online literature. Not literature online.

Mad scientists, unite!

]]> By: dan Michalski http://www.ojr.org/p1885/#comment-2421 dan Michalski Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:01:17 +0000 http://www.ojr.org/?p=1885#comment-2421 where does this piece fit when it takes more than a single click to share on facebook?

]]>