<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: COPPA, part two: New study suggests a majority of kids are on Facebook&#8230; by age 12</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ojr.org/p2029/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ojr.org/p2029/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=p2029</link>
	<description>Focusing on the future of digital journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:43:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 184.7.93.134</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/p2029/#comment-2775</link>
		<dc:creator>184.7.93.134</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 07:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=2029#comment-2775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What struck me in Coppa part two is the assumption that what kids want should be immediately available to them - an assumption I can&#039;t agree with.  I realize it&#039;s very prevalent in parent-child relationships, but I can&#039;t agree that it could ever be in the best interests of the child.  It&#039;s similar to providing every member of the family his/her choice for dinner.  It&#039;s likel little girls permitted to dress like teens, because they want to.  It&#039;s like the inmates running the asylum.

Social media probablly has a place for adults, but  do children actually need it?
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What struck me in Coppa part two is the assumption that what kids want should be immediately available to them &#8211; an assumption I can&#8217;t agree with.  I realize it&#8217;s very prevalent in parent-child relationships, but I can&#8217;t agree that it could ever be in the best interests of the child.  It&#8217;s similar to providing every member of the family his/her choice for dinner.  It&#8217;s likel little girls permitted to dress like teens, because they want to.  It&#8217;s like the inmates running the asylum.</p>
<p>Social media probablly has a place for adults, but  do children actually need it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 71.241.237.66</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/p2029/#comment-2774</link>
		<dc:creator>71.241.237.66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 12:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=2029#comment-2774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prof. Kathy Montgomery and I led the effort in 1998 to have COPPA enacted to ensure that there would be safeguards related to children&#039;s privacy and commercial advertising in the online era. We have urged the FTC to extend its children&#039;s privacy rules to also include mobile and location data tracking, online gaming, and behavioral data tracking. COPPA is the only US privacy law requiring an affirmative opt-in before personal data is collected (in this case done by a parent). Companies dislike the new FTC proposals, which would set a key precedent on consumer privacy protection in the digital era.

This new research is very flawed and has several financial conflicts of interests not disclosed. First, Facebook forces parents and kids to lie because it refuses to set up a COPPA compliant section for children. Facebook is fearful of creating an opt-in regime precedent where users would begin demanding for the right to control what data is collected and how it is done. Facebook is a privacy problem, stealthily tracking and targeting a user and their friends for digital marketing. The paper fails to address why privacy on Facebook is a special concern. If parents had been told when they were questioned about Facebook&#039;s data practices, a different set of responses would likely have been given. COPPA has been a success, because the kind of data practices found everyone online once someone turns 13 aren&#039;t generally found on commercial kids sites.

The study was funded by Microsoft Research. Among the conflicts that should be noted: Microsoft owns a small piece of Facebook; its ad division focuses on social media marketing; the Research division itself works on online ad targeting; and Microsoft is involved in the COPPA regulatory proceeding now at the FTC. It has a financial stake in the outcome of the COPPA proceeding. Readers of the research should have been told about the many conflicts.
Jeff Chester, Center for Digital Democracy
www.democraticmedia.org]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prof. Kathy Montgomery and I led the effort in 1998 to have COPPA enacted to ensure that there would be safeguards related to children&#8217;s privacy and commercial advertising in the online era. We have urged the FTC to extend its children&#8217;s privacy rules to also include mobile and location data tracking, online gaming, and behavioral data tracking. COPPA is the only US privacy law requiring an affirmative opt-in before personal data is collected (in this case done by a parent). Companies dislike the new FTC proposals, which would set a key precedent on consumer privacy protection in the digital era.</p>
<p>This new research is very flawed and has several financial conflicts of interests not disclosed. First, Facebook forces parents and kids to lie because it refuses to set up a COPPA compliant section for children. Facebook is fearful of creating an opt-in regime precedent where users would begin demanding for the right to control what data is collected and how it is done. Facebook is a privacy problem, stealthily tracking and targeting a user and their friends for digital marketing. The paper fails to address why privacy on Facebook is a special concern. If parents had been told when they were questioned about Facebook&#8217;s data practices, a different set of responses would likely have been given. COPPA has been a success, because the kind of data practices found everyone online once someone turns 13 aren&#8217;t generally found on commercial kids sites.</p>
<p>The study was funded by Microsoft Research. Among the conflicts that should be noted: Microsoft owns a small piece of Facebook; its ad division focuses on social media marketing; the Research division itself works on online ad targeting; and Microsoft is involved in the COPPA regulatory proceeding now at the FTC. It has a financial stake in the outcome of the COPPA proceeding. Readers of the research should have been told about the many conflicts.<br />
Jeff Chester, Center for Digital Democracy<br />
<a href="http://www.democraticmedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.democraticmedia.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>