<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Print supplements enrich online publications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ojr.org/print-supplements-enrich-online-publications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ojr.org/print-supplements-enrich-online-publications/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=print-supplements-enrich-online-publications</link>
	<description>Focusing on the future of digital journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:43:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy Record</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/print-supplements-enrich-online-publications/#comment-2825</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Record</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 02:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=2464#comment-2825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the editor and co-owner of an online-only news publication, I see it a different way. Now that we can distribute news without killing trees and burning fossil fuel - it&#039;s irresponsible to continue to use those natural resources. Instead of even spending a cent to try to prop up print publications (currently there are desperate attempts everywhere, such as giant bundles of &quot;free&quot; papers left everywhere in hopes it can be counted as &quot;circulation&quot; to salvage ad deals), we should be intensely discussing how to be certain that electronic news-reading is accessible to absolutely everyone, all ages (I&#039;m 53, by the way, and have long had no interest in reading or writing via the paper medium any longer), all economic levels.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the editor and co-owner of an online-only news publication, I see it a different way. Now that we can distribute news without killing trees and burning fossil fuel &#8211; it&#8217;s irresponsible to continue to use those natural resources. Instead of even spending a cent to try to prop up print publications (currently there are desperate attempts everywhere, such as giant bundles of &#8220;free&#8221; papers left everywhere in hopes it can be counted as &#8220;circulation&#8221; to salvage ad deals), we should be intensely discussing how to be certain that electronic news-reading is accessible to absolutely everyone, all ages (I&#8217;m 53, by the way, and have long had no interest in reading or writing via the paper medium any longer), all economic levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>