More on ethics, criticism and paying the bills, adding the FTC this time

Rhonda Shearer of StinkyJournalism.org called earlier this week in response to my previous post on who pays for things reviewed by critics to remind me of the Federal Trade Commission’s rules on the subject.

I wrote about these rules in 2009, and should have acknowledged them in my piece earlier this week. In summary: The FTC said that online writers who accept freebies or payment from businesses they review must disclose that in their posts. The rule does not apply to those employed by “old media” news organizations or freelancers working on assignment for them.

Advertisers and bloggers aren’t the only people responding to these rules. I’ve heard from my theme park website correspondents that Busch Gardens in Tampa, Florida has asked online reporters attending its press events to sign a statement acknowledging that they will mention in their posts that they attended the event at the park’s invitation, in order to protect Busch Gardens’ corporate parent, SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, from action under the FTC rules.

As much as I’m uncomfortable with the idea of agreeing upfront to include something in coverage as a condition of access, I absolutely see Busch Gardens’ point. Any organization inviting online reporters to cover an event or product has to take steps to protect itself in this legal environment. Personally, I think it’s a good idea to note when a review of coverage is of a press event, or a sample prepared for and sent directly to the press. Such products and events are’t always representative of what a consumer might buy off the shelf or get when he or she visits under “normal” operation. That’s why I’ve permitted my correspondents to sign such agreements, and gone ahead with such disclosures.

The FTC has been taking action on its rules, reaching settlements with some advertisers. The FTC seems especially to be focusing on retailers using online affiliate marketing, where publications are paid a commission on each sale to its readers.

In order to comply with FTC rules, an online publisher must note when it links to a product or service from which it will get a commission on a sale. Again, I think that’s good practice. In my experience, such notes actually have increased sales, and commissions. Loyal readers want to help their favorite websites, and such notes encourage them to click through and do their shopping there, since they know that part of their purchases will go to support a site that they believe in. In this case, disclosure not only helps keep readers informed, it pays off for the publisher.

Publishers must take care when disclosing affiliate links, however. Do not forget that if you are also using Google’s AdSense program, Google prohibits its AdSense publishers from explicitly drawing attention to and encouraging links on its ads “in order to avoid potential inflation of advertiser costs,” as Google’s suggested disclaimer says.

Obviously, a disclaimer on affiliate links draws attention to them. So it’s probably best not to run affiliate links in rotation with Google ads in the same place on your page templates, unless you can modify the template to show the disclaimer only when an affiliate link runs in that place, and not when a Google ad shows there.

And, for the record, I still think it stinks that online publishers are subject to these rules and newspaper and broadcast reporters and critics are not. Disclosure’s always a service to traders, provided that it’s done in an elegant way that informs the reader without bogging down the narrative of a piece. (Oh, to live in a world where we leave the writing to the writers, and not to the lawyers.)

So if you’re a reviewing a movie during a free screening at the studio lot, let us know that. If you’re sailing on a media-only cruise, don’t allow readers to believe that it was a regular, public sailing. If you’re reviewing a hotel on the newspaper’s dime, print that the newspaper paid for the trip. Be explicit. It shouldn’t matter whether you work for a newspaper, a website, another company or yourself. If you didn’t pay out of your own pocket for whatever you are reviewing, you should tell your readers who did.

Let’s count this as my vote to change this rule of journalism ethics. Instead of demanding “that the employer always pays” (because it doesn’t), let’s instead demand that “when the writer doesn’t pay, we tell the reader who did.”

Q&A with the mystery man behind #Quakebook

It’s been more than a month since a 9.0 magnitude earthquake rocked Japan, triggering a massive tsunami, the combination of which have killed thousands. And while the country is slowing putting itself together, under the looming dangers of a potential nuclear disaster, there are many organizations — and individuals — coming together to help in any way they can.

For this week’s post, I chatted with Our Man in Abiko, an international man of mystery behind #Quakebook, a crowdsourced project to help those affected by the devastation.

NOTE: The Q&A was done through e-mail over a course of a couple of weeks.

First, for those who don’t know about it, can you describe what the #Quakebook is, how it came about and your role?

Quakebook coverQuakebook is a Twitter-sourced anthology of first-person accounts of the earthquake and immediate aftermath. It was conceived, written and ready to publish as a fully designed PDF book within a week. It has 89 contributions from “real” people as well as 4 from celebs solicited thru Twitter – William Gibson, Yoko Ono, Barry Eisler and Jake Adelstein.

It is not a collection of tweets, but mostly one-page essays.

I thought of it in the shower Friday morning, March 18th thinking that wouldn’t it be great to do in words what mash-up videos can do on YouTube, especially @fatblueman’s Christmas in Japan video. Check it out, you’ll see what I mean. [The video: http://youtu.be/lmCrIZeob4w]

No-one has received a penny. We got Amazon to waive their fees so ALL revenue goes to the Red Cross. Pinch me, I’m dreaming.

Oh, my role? I’m cheerleader in chief, marshaller of the troops and getter-arounder of problems. Don’t like titles!

NOTE: Our Man recently did a video recently sharing the story of Quakebook: http://youtu.be/cQ_-3-wwLKs

Once you had this idea, how did you go about starting this? Can you talk about the crowdsourcing process?

I had no plan as such. Every time I hit a wall, I asked the good folk of Twitter to give me a leg up :)

The original tweets and stuff are all on quakebook.org and www.ourmaninabiko.com

Talk about the “real” people that contributed to the collection. Have you ever met them? What journalism skills did you apply in collecting their stories?

The real people started with whoever sent me email from around the world, supplemented by my neighbours, my wife and mother-in-law, and also I got my wife to chase down eyewitness accounts from devastated areas through blogs.

The celebs we picked up along the way. The highly unscientific approach has somehow created a snapshot of many disparate elements of the disaster.

I kept in anything that was sent and was not a rant or shopping list. (There were only two like this).

What is your ideal goal you hope to achieve with this book?

I want it to raise oodles and noodles of cash for the Red Cross, but beyond that, I want it to serve as a valuable historical record to answer the question: What happened at 2:46 on March 11, much like John Hersey’s “Hiroshima” answers What happened on Aug. 6, 1945.

What has been the best part of this project?

The therapy of writing and sharing what we have written; seeing the whole project becoming stronger than its constituent parts.

What has surprised you about the process? What’s been the highlight?

How the weekend stops dead any progress with the traditional publishing industry, while the reverse is true of us amateurs. The highlight? Seeing a tweet from someone that they had downloaded the book, and cried. I then did the same and got teary eyed too.

What do you think about those reluctant to use crowdsourcing in storytelling, particularly in journalism. Any advice to them?

Trust people to deliver, and they will. If you get sidetracked by someone with their own agenda, or who doesn’t get the point of the project, don’t waste your time, find someone who does. Behave morally and you will quickly attract the right kind to whatever your project is, if it has merit.

Can you tell me what you did prior to this project? What were you doing in Japan? Talk about Our Man In Abiko.

I’m a British self-employed English language teacher, 40. I’m a former local newspaper journalist. My wife is Japanese and we’ve been here since 2007. Got two kids. My favourite colour is red.

Our Man in Abiko began as a satirical blog on Japanese politics, and became a persona to keep me sane.

Since the earthquake, I realised Our Man was needed to perform Churchillian tasks of rallying the dispirited to overcome our woes.

What is the backstory with Our Man in Abiko? What’s your name and what brought you to Japan?

Not saying. It’s not my story that’s interesting, it’s Japan’s.

Clearly the book is the focus, but “Our Man In Abiko” is a man of mystery. People are naturally going to ask, “who is this guy?” What can you tell them?

He likes Earl Grey tea, playing with his kids and world domination, you know, the usual.

[After more prodding]

OK, well, the Our Man persona began just as a joke on my blog, I took on the mantle of a redundant British agent sent to monitor the wilds of Tokyo commuterville… But then with the earthquake, suddenly the time for fun was long gone, but I realised I had a fictional character who could do great things. I could not muster the troops and build a resistance movement to the earthquake, but maybe Our Man in Abiko could.

Well, Our Man, congratulations on the success with this project. How and where can people find it?

All details are on http://www.quakebook.org and you can buy the book now here: http://amzn.to/quakebook for Kindle (you can download a free Kindle player for PC, Mac and Smart phones there too.)

Thanks for chatting with me. And good luck on this and other endeavors.

Thanks a lot.

Robert Hernandez is a Web Journalism professor at USC Annenberg and co-creator of #wjchat, a weekly chat for Web Journalists held on Twitter. You can contact him by e-mail (r.hernandez@usc.edu) or through Twitter (@webjournalist). Yes, he’s a tech/journo geek.

Online communities need leadership: Will journalists provide it, or will someone else?

Building a helpful online community requires much more than enabling a comment system for articles or throwing open a discussion board. We teach newswriting and editing in journalism schools, but today’s interactive news publisher also needs to know how to elicit thoughtful, informative and instructive reports from readers who’ve never stepped foot in a j-school.

Not to get all “After-School Special” on you, but if you don’t talk to your readers about what to write on your website, someone else will. (Cue scary music.) Do you really want some troll showing your readers how to respond to blog posts on your site? (Cue scarier music.)

Kidding aside, writing in any interactive environment is an act of leadership. Your words, your tone and your style not only inform your audience, they provide a model – an example – for those in the community who will write for that community, as well. And your silence creates a vacuum of leadership that others may fill.

I’ve written before about the ladder of engagement that you should set up for readers on your website. But words of encouragement from you can help persuade your readers to take those steps. You want writing to become a rewarding experience, not just for your readers but for the others who will read them, too. When readers see the value that they’re creating for other readers, that will encourage them to keep writing.

After all, wasn’t the desire to help others through our writing the big reason most of us got into journalism, in the first place?

Here’s some basic advice that you can copy and paste (and modify as you need) to encourage insightful, engaging and rewarding writing from readers of your site:

* * *

Write what you know

The best posts come from people writing about a personal experience. Tell us about an activity you’re deeply involved with, a subject you’ve studied in-depth or an experience you’ve had. Maybe it’s just a review of a new restaurant you’ve visited, or a place you visited on vacation. Whatever you write about, forget for a moment about what others might say – or have said – about something and just tell us your story.

Don’t tell us if something’s ‘good’ or ‘bad’

Whenever a writer declares something ‘good’ or ‘bad’, the piece becomes about the writer, and not the thing the writer is writing about. Whenever you read a review like that from someone you don’t know, don’t you start thinking about whether you can trust this reviewer or not? So leave those types of words out of your writing.

Describe, in detail

Instead, describe your experience, using as many clear details as you can. Put us in the situation with you, and describe as you would to a friend who wasn’t there. Take us through the experience, step by step. Consider the fives senses – sight, sound, smell, taste and touch – and describe each, as appropriate to whatever you’re writing about. Consider these statements:

“The hamburger was terrible.”

“The hamburger looked and tasted like a McDonald’s heat-lamp refugee, thin and wilted, but it cost $12 instead.”

I’d much rather read the second post – it keeps the focus on the burger itself, rather than the writer’s reaction to it. I’ll certainly remember the second statement more than I would the first, too. And I’d be far more likely to forward it to my friends. Keep that in mind when you’re writing. Detailed descriptions really help other readers feel like they are there with you, sharing this experience.

Link, don’t copy

If you find something else online you want to share with other readers, don’t just copy and paste it to the site. Link to it instead. That way, other readers can see the original source for themselves.

Explain why you link

Whenever you link to something, though, explain why you’re linking to it. What’s it about? Why is it important to you? Why do you think it would be important to the rest of us? You explanation helps start a conversation about the link.

Respect, and respond

When other readers share their experiences on the site, respect them. If you don’t feel that their experience reflects your experience with the same event/subject/place, then respond by sharing your experience with it.

Again, leave out those judgmental words (especially the negative ones: ‘terrible,’ ‘stupid,’ ‘awful,’ etc.), and write instead about your experience. That helps keeps everyone’s focus on the subject under discussion, and not on a emerging flame war between readers.

* * *

Advice such as this can help direct readers toward more informative posting. And by doing that, you’re also encouraging more civility on your website.

Expecting readers to know how to react in an a new online forum is like expecting students to pass a final exam on the first day of classes, or a group of new hires to run a factory after clocking in on their first shift. And readers know that. Most of them, in my experience, look for some clues from the people already active in a community before jumping into their conversation.

You can leave that leadership position to whatever loudmouth chooses to claim it, or you can claim that leadership for yourself. It’s your choice. Comment sections don’t have to be vile, troll-ruled wastelands. As journalists have learned over generations how to guide sources through an interview, to elicit the most useful information possible, news publishers also can learn how to guide their readers through online conversations.

Eventually, the community even can develop to the point where the best of our contributing readers become responsible leaders themselves, promoting good journalism by training subsequent generations of readers how best to contribute to the site. But someone’s got to get this started.

And that skill is as important within journalism in the 21st century as reporting, writing and editing have been in the past.