<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Online Journalism Review&#187; instagram</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ojr.org/tag/instagram/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ojr.org</link>
	<description>Focusing on the future of digital journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 03:41:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pew releases social media demographics for 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/pew-releases-social-media-demographics-for-2012/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=pew-releases-social-media-demographics-for-2012</link>
		<comments>http://www.ojr.org/pew-releases-social-media-demographics-for-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 20:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Juliani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Repeater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instagram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pinterest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumblr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[young people online]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=2345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pew released its research on the demographics of social media users for 2012. Jim Romenesko put them together in a pithy breakdown. Two-thirds of adults who use the Internet use Facebook, which was way ahead of all other sites. Sixteen percent are on Twitter, doubled from November 2010. Young people are more likely to use [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2440" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 195px"><img src="http://www.ojr.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/lse-library-student-on-computer.jpg" alt="This isn&#039;t your mom and dad&#039;s Internet anymore. (Credit: LSE Library/Flickr)" width="185" height="239" class="size-full wp-image-2440" /><p class="wp-caption-text">This isn&#8217;t your mom and dad&#8217;s Internet anymore. (Credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lselibrary/">LSE Library</a>/<a href="http://www2.lse.ac.uk/library/archive/flickr_rights_statement.aspx">Flickr</a>)</p></div>
<p><a href="http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Social-media-users/Social-Networking-Site-Users/Demo-portrait.aspx" target="_blank">Pew released its research</a> on the demographics of social media users for 2012. <a href="http://jimromenesko.com/2013/02/14/meet-your-social-media-users/" target="_blank">Jim Romenesko put them together in a pithy breakdown</a>. Two-thirds of adults who use the Internet use Facebook, which was way ahead of all other sites. Sixteen percent are on Twitter, doubled from November 2010. Young people are more likely to use Facebook and Twitter, and women are more likely to use Facebook than men. Pinterest attracts more white people. Instagram has more African-American and Hispanic users than whites. Though Tumblr brings up the rear with only 6 percent of Internet users, it&#8217;s much more popular among young people, with 13 percent of 18- to 29-year-olds online signed up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ojr.org/pew-releases-social-media-demographics-for-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>InformaCam App Will Help Verify Citizen Journalism Content</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/informacam-app-will-help-verify-citizen-journalism-content/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=informacam-app-will-help-verify-citizen-journalism-content</link>
		<comments>http://www.ojr.org/informacam-app-will-help-verify-citizen-journalism-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 04:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Juliani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Repeater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InformaCam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instagram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NIeman Lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superstorm Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Witness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many viral shots of the first 24 hours of Hurricane Sandy turned out to be fake.  Somehow we missed detecting that one right away.  Citizen journalism yields a lot of incredible stuff, but kinks still exist (only human, right?).  According to the Nieman Lab, the human rights organization Witness is creating an app that hopes [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_256" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 170px"><a href="http://www.ojr.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/sandy.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-256" title="sandy" src="http://www.ojr.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/sandy.jpg" alt="" width="160" height="239" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">A supposedly real shot of Hurricane Sandy water. (Wikimedia Commons)</p></div>
<p><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/10/sorting-the-real-sandy-photos-from-the-fakes/264243/" target="_blank">Many viral shots </a>of the first 24 hours of Hurricane Sandy turned out to be fake.  Somehow we missed detecting that one right away.  Citizen journalism yields a lot of incredible stuff, but kinks still exist (only human, right?).  According to the <a href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2013/01/is-it-real-witness-builds-an-app-to-verify-user-submitted-content/" target="_blank">Nieman Lab</a>, the human rights organization <a href="http://www.witness.org/" target="_blank">Witness</a> is creating an app that hopes to make it easier to nab the fake videos, photos, and audio people share from mobile devices.  The InformaCam app &#8220;would bring metadata to the forefront, allowing journalists, human rights organizations, and others to better identify the origins of a photo or video.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ojr.org/informacam-app-will-help-verify-citizen-journalism-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>