Translating research theory into a multilingual local news website

Facing City Hall in Alhambra, California, a predominantly Asian and Latino suburb just east of Los Angeles, a life-size bronze statue of a man sits holding a newspaper. A plaque says the statue is dedicated to the memory of Warner Jenkins, “Alhambra’s beloved journalist/chronicler.” That is the closest a journalist gets to Alhambra’s City Hall most days. Local news coverage in the municipality of roughly 90,000 is severely lacking. What exists tends to be in Chinese or crime coverage in the area’s larger dailies.

USC’s Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, responding to the dearth of reporting on Alhambra and the challenge of creating a media outlet in an ethnically and linguistically diverse area, launched the Alhambra Project in 2008. Michael Parks, former director of the journalism school and former editor of the Los Angeles Times, and Sandra Ball-Rokeach, a communication researcher and director of the Metamorphosis Project, collaborated with support from the Annenberg Foundation. Parks was interested in investigating how local news coverage could better serve communities. Ball-Rokeach, whose research had previously found that the Alhambra area had one of the lowest levels of civic engagement in Los Angeles County, wanted to explore how creating a news product grounded in local needs could improve that level of engagement.

I joined the project in early summer of last year. As a journalist with a background in immigration reporting – and with a smattering of community organizing skills, including managing a Brooklyn farmer’s market and running a small non-profit magazine – my assignment was to take the research ideas and help translate them into an online news source grounded in local needs.

Mapping the contours of a community

While communication doctoral students conducted focus groups, media monitoring and field research, my job was to research an appropriate fit for our news product. Every day last year a new local site seemed to appear online, giving rise to a range of hybrid approaches where professional journalists worked with residents to create new versions of the community newspaper.

From studying these other models, I realized we would face some major obstacles in creating our theoretical goal of a “common storytelling network.” In particular, to function in Alhambra, where roughly a quarter of households have no adult who speaks English well, multiple languages were needed. But how to create a hybrid site that is multilingual, and, of particular interest to me, how to do it with a full-time staff consisting only of myself?

Putting technology to work

To answer some of these questions the Alhambra Project hosted a “deep think” which brought together a select group of USC Web engineers and news innovators. The workshop led us to focus on how a news website could serve communities of interest across ethnic groups. Although it would, at times, be easier for me to just report and write the stories myself, another focus was making this a community project, and using digital tools as much as possible to encourage participation.

It was increasingly clear that we would not, at least initially, be able to translate all of the pages on the website. Automated machine translation, available through Google and other providers, has gotten to the point where meaning can be conveyed, but nuance is lost. We decided to translate static pages, such as those explaining the workings of the site, but at least in the initial stages, we would have to rely on automated translation, paired with a disclaimer, for the rest.

Even without being able to translate all stories into three languages, other linguistic methods to bridge community information sources appeared. As I met with government officials, I learned that almost none were reading what the relatively active Chinese media said about them. In the spirit of New America Media, one of the first elements we added to our site was a selected aggregation and translation of stories, at least half of which come from the ethnic media.

Seeing the results on Main Street

Despite great effort on all sides, it took us a year to complete our multilingual site, the Alhambra Source. For me this has been a major source of frustration, but as we approached launch date I realized that perhaps it might have been to our advantage. We needed time to create a team of collaborators of both community members and students from a high school program that could inform site development and feel a real sense of ownership. A significant component of the communication research, as well, needed that time to come together. This fall, USC will be conducting a major study of civic engagement levels in Alhambra, with the intent of updating it in two years to see the effect of the news product.

On a recent Saturday evening, I was very encouraged to hear what Kerrie Gutierrez, a mother of five who has gone back to school to complete her bachelor’s degree, had to say. We were at an outdoor festival on Main Street Alhambra, when the founding community contributor for the Source approached a woman holding an infant. Using an iPad from USC Annenberg, Gutierrez showed the woman a story on Alhambra artist Yolanda Gonzalez. “I wrote that article,” she told the woman, “and I’m not a journalist.”

She then explained the collection of stories, including one about how Alhambra had recently canceled its elections for the first time ever because no challengers had stepped up to run against five incumbents. Other stories, Gutierrez said, had been translated from Chinese, and soon most local news and events would be there, in whatever language was necessary. The woman nodded enthusiastically about the prospect of this website, and signed her name to subscribe to our mailing list.

Until that moment, so much of the site had been theoretical, even if it was well-researched theory. But when Kerrie Gutierrez explained the Alhambra Source, I began to see how this type of journalism initiative could affect lives in this community. The site is just barely launched, and even I’ve been surprised how exciting it is to watch the site begin to develop and take on a life of its own.

What can journalism schools learn from watching the University of Colorado?

Last week, news reports hit that the University of Colorado at Boulder would close its journalism school. By the end of the afternoon, the story had morphed a bit – CU wouldn’t be getting out of journalism education, but instead convening a commission to look at restructuring the school, putting its future as a separate entity in question.

(By the way, does anyone have an explanation why several of the former Big Eight schools transpose their initials? How does the “University of Colorado” become CU? I digress….)

Colorado’s earned harsh criticism for the way it handled this announcement. Students, alumni and community members can’t rally around uncertainty. Yes, journalism education needs to evolve as the industry also must, in response to the economic disruption the Internet has brought to the field. But if Colorado administrators couldn’t have offered a specific plan for the future of journalism education at their institution, I’d argue they’d have served their community better by opening up their decision-making process, instead of putting forth closing the school as their primary option. Why leave your students and faculty hanging like this, especially when none of them will be on the commission deciding the school’s fate?

Still, every college and university that teaches journalism must be prepared to address some tough questions about the future of journalism education. For that, Colorado’s not alone.

A personal note: I’ve had some experience with university restructuring, having served as one of five student members of a 23-member student/faculty/administration task force charged with revamping Northwestern University’s undergraduate division back in 1988. Done right, this is tough work that stirs up conflict right away, but in the hope of securing long-term stability for an institution.

I see three huge challenges facing higher education today, challenges that aren’t unique to any journalism school.

1. The cost equation

It shouldn’t surprise anyone that we’ve got a generation of graduates who can’t afford to buy homes and start families. The cost of college has exploded past the inflation rate over the past generation, rising 32 percent at public schools and 24 percent at private institutions just between 1999 and 2009. And that’s after adjusting for inflation.

Students are borrowing more to keep up, and starting salaries for journalists aren’t rising at anywhere near the levels of tuition, student indebtedness or the cost of buying a house – which remains far above the traditional “three times your annual salary” limit in many markets, despite the recent slide in prices.

Something’s got to give, and what’s being given up is a quality of life – recent graduates are moving back in with their parents, delaying parenthood and limiting their spending as they try to pay back their loans, save for a home or just get by in a brutal employment market. With so little spending coming from people who should be starting their lives, is it any wonder the nation lingers in an economic slump?

That slump means less tax revenue for public college and universities, too, forcing spending cuts and even more tuition increases. Clearly, the cost equation for higher education is broken. Administrators must find ways to reduce the cost of higher education, so that they aren’t continuing to break their graduates’ and states’ budgets.

2. The lines between fields are blurring

What’s the difference today between a School of Cinema student filming a 10-minute documentary for YouTube and School of Journalism student shooting a 10-minute video story for YouTube? The medium, financing and distribution channel differences that once helped differentiate documentary filmmaking from broadcast journalism are evaporating as everyone moves toward online publishing. That’s just one example why schools, too, ought to be converging.

The most rewarding experience I’ve had to date in journalism education has been my work with the Marshall School of Business at USC, helping teach entrepreneurial skills to mid-career reporters and editors. Entrepreneurial journalism’s a hot subject in many j-schools now, and appropriately so. But many universities with journalism schools also have business schools with entrepreneurship faculty. Given the need to contain costs in the university, do j-schools really need to duplicate resources already available in the business school? If school policies and customs are keeping one school’s students from accessing another’s faculty, doesn’t that point to the need to re-evaluate why those divisions and barriers are permitted to exist?

As the lines between fields disappear, the lines dividing schools must be erased as well.

3. Students are teaching themselves

I raised this issue last month. With more kids exploring online, they’re picking up not only digital skills, but also accessing a wide and deep range of instruction available on the Internet. Some elementary students today have mastered digital production skills that graduate journalism students struggled with just a few years ago.

This ought to be changing the focus of higher education – not just in the classroom but within the admissions department, as well. And it should be prompting university faculty to engage with secondary and elementary teachers, to get a better feel for how the Internet is affecting student learning – for good and for bad – so that all educators can better address and adapt to those changes. Let’s never forget that higher education is merely the continuation of a process that begins in pre-school. College and university faculty who ignore opportunities to participate earlier in the education process only harm their own teaching and understanding of student learning.

Take these three challenges together, and it ought to be clear that we’ve arrived at the time when colleges and universities need to start blowing things up and recreating higher education. We need to find a way to better educate students who need more interdisciplinary instruction, and at a lower cost than we’ve able to do so in the past.

School administrators would do well to handle this process better than their colleagues at the University of Colorado did last week. But for all of Colorado’s clumsiness with its announcement, it should be clear that the more irresponsible thing for a college or university to do at this point would be to plan no changes at all with its line-up of schools and subjects of instruction.

This year's advice for journalism students

Students will be arriving (or returning) to journalism schools over the next month, providing me with a convenient excuse to offer students some beginning-of-the-year advice.

1. Don’t believe that journalism school will help you prepare for your career. Why? Because your journalism career’s already started. The moment you first posted a comment, photo or status update to the Web, you began your work as a journalist.

Doesn’t that make just about everyone on the Internet a journalist, you might ask? Well, yes. Even if most folks never post anything newsworthy or of interest to anyone outside their immediate circle of family and friends, everyone who posts online has the potential do create journalism, should they happen to be in the right (or wrong, depending on your point of view) place or hear the right thing at the right time and post it. Immediate access to a global publishing medium allows any source to become a breaking news reporter, if only for just a moment.

You’re going to journalism school to help you improve the journalism career you’ve already begun, not to launch it.

2. Audience equals power for journalism job-seekers. This might be the most important lesson you learn in your journalism education, but most instructors aren’t prepared to teach it to you. They began their careers under a different model, when reporters earned their first gigs based upon the work they did in the classroom, on the student newspaper (or radio/TV station) and, perhaps, during an internship.

They’ll steer you toward those same options today, and there’s much to learn there, still. But place yourself in the position of an editor, having to hire a recent graduate for his or her newsroom. Do you take the one with the great clips and enthusiastic recommendations? Or the one with the great clips, enthusiastic recommendations, and the 5,000 daily unique visitors to her video blog?

Given that traffic becomes your traffic one you hire her, you take the second student. Every single time. So be that second student. Start building your audience now.

3. Your career is only as strong as your network. A generation ago, this meant building relationships with your instructors, and then finding the right internship, where you’d start building your professional network.

Today, your network functions mostly online, where you need to connect with colleagues as well as with the readers who’ll do the most work in spreading your reporting via Facebook, Twitter, e-mail, YouTube or whatever social network comes along.

Build your network within the journalism field by following smart journalists on Twitter and establishing LinkedIn connections with the instructors you admire, as well as the reporters and editors you meet on the job. Build your network outside the field by establishing a personal, professional website (ideally, yourname.com). Create a Facebook fan page that site. Start a Twitter feed. Build an opt-in e-mail list of newsletter subscribers.

Read OJR and other journalism websites, and talk with instructors about the best ways to use social media and online networking, responsibly, to draw attention to your work and to build your personal “brand” as a journalist.

4. Pursue your passion, and develop expertise within it. The most rewarding way to draw attention to your work is, of course, to have something of value to say. Don’t expect to work as a general assignment reporter. Build your audience, and your reputation, by becoming an expert in a field that stirs your passion.

You’ll need to have passion for this field, since you’ll have to devote an immense amount of time to learning about it an covering it to distinguish your work from the others who’ll be writing and reporting on the same topic. Take advantage of your time at school by taking a second major in the topic you most want to cover as a journalist. (Some schools are requiring this now.) Build your network within that field as you build your network within journalism.

5. Conduct yourself as a journalist, at all times. Anytime you post online, you publish. Anything you say or do that might be posted by someone else reflects upon that brand that you’ll be working so hard to build. Don’t undercut your hard work with moments of Facebook foolishness.

Nor should you stop reporting when you surf for fun online. Stories can emerge from anywhere. Soak in all the information you touch, and when you read, watch or listen think always “Would others find this interesting?” That’s how you find the material you’ll need to fill your blog, Twitter feed or whatever else you publish online.

Good luck, best wishes and never wait for someone to hire you before starting to work.