Newspapers use YouTube video previews to attract readers

After the Dallas Morning News and the St. Petersburg Times debuted extensive investigative reporting projects on their websites last year, they went to YouTube to market them. The News recast existing video footage from the online features into gripping movie trailers. The Times made a music video starring its staff. In an era where even journalists ponder whether a newspaper or a TV show is better at covering social issues, are traditional newspapers ready to learn something from Hollywood? In the future, will we be looking to YouTube for what’s coming soon to a newspaper.com near us?

OJR spoke to Anthony Moor, Dallas Morning News’ Deputy Managing Editor/Interactive [and who is also a member of OJR's editorial advisory board], and swapped e-mails with Leslie White, Dallas Morning News’ Director of Photography, and Christine Montgomery, Managing Editor of TampaBay.com, about why they made the videos and how successful they were in attracting new readers.


“Unequal Justice” explores why 56 convicted murderers in Texas were sentenced to probation rather than jail.


“Texas Youth Commission” documents the scandal plaguing the state agency of the same name created to rehabilitate young offenders.

OJR: Why a trailer? What prompted the idea? Have you done anything like it before?

Moor: First of all, we shot video as part of the multimedia presentation of these projects. Both “Unequal Justice” and “Texas Youth Commission” had significant multimedia components. “Texas Youth Commission” had a smaller print component, while “Unequal Justice” was mostly print with a small Web component. So since we had the video already, we just decided to leverage that to make a trailer. Secondly, these are large projects even for the paper as a whole. We spent time on them. We wanted to give them as much exposure as possible on the Web.

A lot of our challenge overall as news organizations is to try and attract an audience for these big projects with a public service mission. Our Sunday newspaper audience is already familiar with our work – we already have them. How can we get people who don’t read the paper on Sunday, who haven’t picked up the paper? We want them to become interested and informed by news and information that matters to them. Those projects can be daunting for audience to enter in this day and age because of all the competing media out there. So we need to attract a new audience by using more effective techniques to tell them about what we were doing. The multimedia project of course is a way of getting people to enter into the story.

Secondly, we would like to have them think of the Dallas Morning News as places to go for news that matters to them, whether they’re newspaper subscribers or users of the Web.

White: Our projects editor, Maud Beelman, had suggested that we put up an overview video on DallasNews.com a few days before publication in the newspaper. Our video editor took a crack at it, but it’s rather impossible to sum up a story as complex as “probation for murder” in Dallas County. Early attempts involved having one of the reporters narrate the story.

It was my feeling that it took what we knew to be a dramatic and emotional story and turned it into what was basically a talking head video. We suggested borrowing from our best work in videos (shot by staff photographer Kye Lee) and putting it together to pull our readers back to the site on Sunday, after the stories were published with the full video content.

The end result carried a great deal more emotional impact.

OJR: Did you know from the start that you wanted to put it up on YouTube? Did you put the video up on any other sites?

Moor: I recommended that we adapt it for YouTube as a way to get an audience interested in it. We did post different versions of the video – the YouTube version was more for people who didn’t already have an understanding of our publication.

Apart from the traditional promotions, we didn’t put the video up on other sites. We wanted to attract a new audience but we weren’t sophisticated at all about it. We’d like to take more advantage of that down the line.

OJR: What were these “traditional promotions?”

Moor: The people involved in the project sent out to our own networks, put it on our Facebook pages. We also put the trailer out on YouTube ahead of the project’s publication. The project was set to run online on Saturday and in the paper on Sunday.

OJR: How did YouTube’s style affect the tone of the trailer?

Moor: Our people in the photography department really wanted to produce the video in a very captivating, dynamic, edgy format. We wanted to make you feel not only like you want to look at this, but that you want to put nine dollars down and watch a movie about it. So quick cuts, pounding music, and trailer-like tease in the storyline.

White: Well, we didn’t shoot specifically for the trailer, but we knew the edit needed to be aggressive both emotionally and visually to capture the reader. I think that anyone who has ever seen a few movies has the basic requirements for storytelling in the specific way that trailers rely on.

If you view all the videos from “Unequal Justice”, you’ll see that we pulled moments specifically for the emotional impact and storytelling moments in each.

OJR: How successful was the video in generating interest for the projects? Were you able to track how many people visited the site after seeing the video?

Moor: I’m not sure if we could do that. We’re seeing numbers in the hundreds. It’s not a lot. I’m not going to say that this is a breakout way to reach the audience, but we have to do things like this. It’s not like we don’t understand what YouTube is about. And because of the way that news and info is being distributed on the Web, we have to gain new job skills within our current titles. For example, a traffic acquisition manager – not the types of things that newspaper or website editors do. We thought this is a good way to experiment with that.

OJR: Looking back, what lessons did you learn from making the two videos? What would you tell other newspapers who are thinking about doing this? Any plans to put up more videos like this in the future?

White: I tend to look at the trailers not just as a feature on YouTube, but a way to attract more readers back to DallasNews.com for the whole story. We’ve definitely learned that a “summary video” of an investigation is not going to play as well as the real emotion of the subjects. I think any way you can get readers to your site to read, view and experience one of the newspapers best stories is a win-win. We’ll definitely be doing it more in the future.

Moor: I do think that down the line, newspapers will need to consider, within either the editorial apparatus or in marketing, creating a job where your responsibility is to ensure that articles are search engine optimized. That person will also have to get your news and info out on new platforms like iTunes, Digg, Drudge, Google News, NewsVine, and so on. If you think about how much news we push on a given day, if one article needs to be distributed through all those channels – how are we going to manage that?


“Gimme the Truth,” a music video created by and starring members of the St. Petersburg Times staff, is the fight song of Politifact, the Web collaboration between the Times and the Congressional Quarterly to fact-check statements made by the presidential candidates.

OJR: What’s new and unique about Politifact?

Montgomery: While fact-checking isn’t new, fact-checking statements presidential candidates make on the campaign trail and then actually making a ruling on the veracity of the claims is different. A lot of political coverage merely repeats what the candidates, pundits, support and opposition groups say and the readers are left to figure out for themselves what’s true, sort of true or outright false. When Politifact editors select a claim to fact-check, they dig deeply, going to original sources and documents. We try to be transparent in our reporting by linking to source docs whenever possible. We database all the claims and our rulings, making the site very easy to search. We have six different rulings, by the way, ranging from “true” to “pants-on-fire” liar.

OJR: Why a music video? Whose idea was it and what prompted the idea? Have you done anything like it before?

Montgomery: Definitely our first music video. Here’s how it came about: Our Marketing department was putting plans into place for marketing Politifact.com, using tried and true means like in-paper ads and some radio spots. We knew those would be effective in reaching our core newspaper readers and people interested in politics. But Politifact.com is the kind of site that makes politics accessible and interesting to lots of people. Especially young people, we thought. So a few of us on the editorial side started brainstorming ways to get the word out in a more viral way — that is, ways that would be easy for people to share with each other. It was about that time that the Obama Girl videos (one and two) were such a hit on YouTube. One idea lead to another and before we knew it, we had an original song called “Gimme the Truth,” composed by one of our metro editors. It was catchy!

Then one of our web editors with excellent video skills story-boarded an idea for the video. We booked a place to shoot the video, built and gathered the props, got dozens of people from inside and outside the company interested in participating, and shot the thing in a day. Editing took a couple more days. From idea to launch, it took about one month.

OJR: Did you know from the start that you wanted to put it up on YouTube? Did you put the video up on any other sites?

Montgomery: Yes, we made this video for YouTube specifically. We also seeded it on over a dozen other video sites, such as Crackle (where it was featured as their top political video for some time), Yahoo!, MySpace and MetaCafe. It has appeared on our main site, tampabay.com and is still linked off the Politifact.com home page.

OJR: Tell me about the newspaper staff involved in making the video. What special skills or interests did they have that made the idea work?

Montgomery: I mentioned the metro editor, Chris Ave, who is a musician/songwriter in his off time — and has a cameo appearance the video as guitarist/back-up singer. The Web editor is Adrian Philips. He had run his own video business before joining the Times in 2005. He came up with he storyline, shot, directed, and edited the video. His editor Anne Glover, helped gather props, manage the project and rally the troops throughout the organization to appear in the video. The only special skills those staffers needed were a sense of humor and the willingness to give up part of their Saturday. We hired a local producer and singer to record the song. Our singer appears as the lead in the video, the song’s producer is playing bass in the video. Playing drums in the video is our media critic, Eric Deggans.

OJR: How successful was the video in generating interest for Politifact? Were you able to track how many people visited the site after seeing the video?

Montgomery: So far the video has been viewed more than 200,000 times on YouTube. Unfortunately, we can’t track how many of the viewers then clicked to our site. We did see a week-over-week spike in Politifact.com traffic of 67% when the Gimme the Truth video was featured on YouTube’s homepage. Of course, it was also the week we hosted a GOP debate in our hometown and we were doing a lot of other promotion of the site. That said, I’m thrilled with the response and consider it a successful marketing effort.

OJR: Looking back, what lessons did you learn? What would you tell other newspapers who are thinking about doing this? Any plans to put up more videos like this in the future?

Montgomery: We learned that YouTube is indeed an effective way to reach people in a way that traditional marketing can’t. We learned that we can do “serious journalism” and poke a little fun at ourselves at the same time. As sort of atypical as “Gimme the Truth” is as promotional content, it does a good job of showing people what the site’s mission is all about. What would I tell other papers thinking about doing this? Go for it. It was a lot of fun and it gave many of our staffers a fresh outlet for their work. Also, all in all, it was a fairly inexpensive endeavor.

Top 9 gifts for online journalists

Being an online journalist is sort of the perfect storm on your wallet. It’s not the most lucrative of professions and you need/want/can’t resist keeping up with the latest cool stuff. But luckily, the Internet takes care of its own. I’ve compiled a list of nine (because 10 was too many) awesome products, some technological, some lifestyle-oriented, that I think make great gifts for online journalists and bloggers.

For the most part, they’re pretty affordable. And the stuff that’s expensive is worth it, in this reporter’s humble opinion. The methodology for gathering the gear? Pretty casual–mostly I asked my working journalist friends, Googled for slick gadgets and lauded gear that I own and use myself (or want desperately but can’t quite afford). Just to be clear, I’m not hyping this stuff for personal gain of any kind–these are actual products I like, use or want. Nobody gave me free stuff or anything. (Which is a bummer, really.)

It’s the Online Journalism Review’s first annual Top 9 Gifts for Online Journalists list! (In reverse order of awesomeness.)

So, happy holidays from OJR, don’t say I never gave you anything.

9. Record sound

It’s not terribly thrilling, but boy is it useful. Belkin’s TuneTalk Stereo allows you to record large amounts of digital audio right to your iPod’s hard drive and then upload to your computer for later transcription. Add a cellular microphone like this one and record your phone interviews. 80 GB of hard drive space–or more–means that you can save every interview you have done and prove that you’ve never misquoted in your whole career. Be sure to get your subject’s consent before you record your conversations, though.

8. Listen

If you’re like me, you listen to a lot of audio. Digital files of interviews, podcasts, the mic feed from DV cameras, YouTube videos, my iPod–you get the point. Pretty soon, it becomes worthwhile to get a really good pair of noise-canceling headphones. Unfortunately, quality is extremely commensurate with price in this department–and you can really spend a bundle. For this list I picked the second-best Bose noise-cancelers out there. The QuietComfort 2 is last year’s top of the line, and at $300, it’s still pricey, but $50 less than the current QuietComfort 3. People love ‘em: “Bose’s standard-setting noise-canceling headphones have just upped the ante.” (CNet.com) If you’re going to spend the money, this series is the one to get.

7. Write and draw

I want one of these pretty badly. The Bamboo Fun is a consumer-grade PC drawing and writing tablet. It’s not for expert draftsmen or NASA engineers, but if you want to publish a Web comic, scribble your own handwriting and have it translated to text or decorate your blog with art and script of your own design, this is the tool you want. It’s cheap–100 bucks for the small 5.8″ x 3.7″ writing area one, $200 for the big 8.5″ x 5.3″–and it comes with a bunch of cool paint-type software. The biggest selling point for me is the paper-like textured drawing area and the 512 different pressure setting on the pen nib. (The harder you press, the thicker the line, etc.) Awesome.

6. Find your way

After extensive searching, it became clear that there are so many car GPS systems these days, but one is actually much better reviewed than the rest. They all do the big task pretty well: helping you get to an appointment on time when you are lost in an unfamiliar area. But, many people really like the Tom Tom series. It’s small, easy to use and Bluetooth compatible, though some reviews point out that the list of phones it talks nicely too is a little small. The best all-around unit seems to be the Tom Tom Go 720, which, in addition to the range of expected features, allows you to download celebrity voices to replace the stock U.S.S. Enterprise-style synth voice. I particularly like the idea of being told where to drive by Mr. T. I pity the fool who missed the Fairfax offramp.

5. Carry stuff

If you looked in my messenger bag for clues to my inner self a la Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried, you’d find the clues of a techno-frantic lifestyle: phones, chargers, cameras, spare batteries, USB thumb drives, scribbled notes and nicotine gum. A good bag can add a sense of compartmentalized organization and calm to an otherwise hectic interview schedule. I really dig Chrome Bags. They’re super big, have a certain hipster cache with the seatbelt buckle and side-slung profile, and best of all, keep my stuff in the right place. The biggest one, the “Kremlin”, is 3000 cubic inches, which apparently is the actual volume of the Kremlin. (Not really.) These guys make excellent laptop bags as well.

4. Take pictures

Okay, so we all take lots of pictures for our jobs. Oftentimes, as online journalists, we are not necessarily trying to take print-quality pictures sharp enough to grace the cover of Time Magazine. Blogs do not require 10 megapixel resolution. But as a writer and blogger who has shown up to countless conferences with crummy pocket cameras with only 3x zoom, I can attest to the fact that sometimes you need a little more. Plus, having a bulkier SLR slung around your neck gives you a ton of silent credibility–and can get you into places for the story that a fanboy waving a happy-snaps camera cannot.

Luckily for us there are a bunch of really good cameras in the middle zone between entry level and $3000-minimum 10 mp pro grade cameras. I defer to the Digital SLR Guide website, which has a really solid list of SLRs for under $600. Their choice? The Olympus Evolt E-330. It’s 7.5 mp, and, like a consumer grade camera, has live-viewing through the LCD screen (which is unusual for SLRs), allowing you to shoot from the hip if you want. It won a couple awards too, from Popular Science and J.D. Power (those glass-trophy guys who rate stuff). Shop around though, this camera and 14-44mm zoom lens sell for anywhere from $500 to $999 on the official site.

3. Get there

“Go get me a copy of that lawsuit/document/public record/etc.!” your editor yells, probably without those typographical slashes. The dread fills the pit of your stomach. You have to try to park downtown and go to the County Courthouse or City Hall or the Hall of Records or whatever. It will take five hours, cost $30 and surgically extract the joy from your day. Except there’s a solution and I use it every day of my life. It’s called a motorscooter. Instead of crawling through traffic, I zip to the front of each stoplight, beating everyone (including potential journalistic competition) to the destination. Parking? You don’t pay. Here in Los Angeles, there’s a strip of sidewalk in front of the courthouse that has a dozen scooters rowed up at any given time, all belonging to couriers who’ve figured out the secret of modern urban transport.

Full disclosure: I am a rabid Vespa aficionado and I love my ET4 to death. There are tons of quality, utilitarian scooters out there by Honda and Yamaha, but for me, there is no substitute for the sexy lines of Enrico Piaggio’s buzzing “wasp.” The best choice out there now in terms of modern, 4-stroke fuel efficient Vespas is the LX150. It’s got enough pep in the 149cc motor to get you up the hills while keeping emissions low and fuel economy high (around 80 mpg). $4199.

2. Read

To be honest, I don’t really know where I fall with Amazon’s Kindle wireless reader. I love E-ink technology and find it tremendously readable. But do we need a lightweight replacement for newspapers and books? This is an endless debate for another column, but I will say it might be the half-way solution for those who hate reading newspapers online but can’t haul 20 lbs. of Sunday editions around in their backpacks all day. Who knows. Some part of me says “Bah, people will always want to hold physical novels in their hands…” and some other part of me looks around his room and sees a big blank spot where his shelf of CD jewel cases used to be. So, Kindle is on this list as a heavily qualified late entrant: I’ve never used one, I know it’s going to be controversial: it’s too expensive, battery life may be an issue, Amazon charges you to read free content(!) but Kindle has the potential to change the way we read the news and blogs. This is one to watch and expect more reporting on it from me soon. They’re all sold out, so this may not be an good gift idea, either. Wiki: Kindle.

1. Connect

I debated pretty hard with myself for a good four minutes about whether or not to put the i-word on here. Unless you have been blogging from inside a sensory deprivation chamber, you probably know that there’s a big debate around the iPhone. This is not the time or the place and I am not the guy to explain it to you, but basically, Steve Job’s new cash calf can do all sorts of pretty neat stuff like keypad-less email and web browsing, a manner of phony GPS roving that uses Google maps to tell you where you are (but only when you tell it where you are), and of course, it plays music like a puny iPod only big enough to hold a fraction of your music. You could fill it to the brim with Robert Pollard/GBV back catalog alone.

But the biggest problem (aside from face-grease on the touch screen) is that you are stuck with the lumbering crippled behemoth that is AT&T née Cingular. Most anecdotal reports I’ve heard say that L.A. coverage is hopelessly spotty (read: more hopelessly spotty than other carriers). Worse still, if you unlock the SIM card to get Verizon or shudder, T-Mobile, (why you would want that, I have no idea), you run the risk of your friends in Cupertino nuking your phone from space.

That said, the Apple iPhone is the number-one gift for online journalists in 2007. The ability to live-update blogs with text and pictures effortlessly and from anywhere is indispensable. The sheer ooh-ahh factor is off the charts. Yes, the iPhone is way overpriced, has a wimpy HD, a totalitarian service plan and bogus coverage, but it is so dang cool that this list would be hopelessly remiss if it wasn’t at the top. I don’t have one yet but it is only a matter of time. (Mr. Jobs if you are reading this, I’m only kidding, please send me one. The 8gb preferably.)

Reading this back, I see the ultimate solipsist gift registry, as if I’m marrying myself. Remember when Homer gave Marge a bowling ball with his name pre-engraved on it? It’s better to write about receiving then to give, I suppose. Happy holidays and I hope this list has helped you please the most important online journalist in your life, which may or may not be yourself.

Not just a homicide map

Last month’s Online Journalism Awards recognized the projects for which the medium is a large part of the message: those groundbreaking vehicles for reporting and storytelling made possible by the Web.

Oakland Tribune Web producers Katy Newton and Sean Connelley were the stars of that show, taking home two awards for Not Just A Number, their multi-layered interactive project geared toward humanizing homicide statistics in Oakland, Calif., consistently home to one of the nation’s highest murder rates.

Plotting crime on a map is nothing new. The Los Angeles Times similarly tracks its city’s murders in real time. Minneapolis’ Rake Magazine rolled out a homicide location graphic in an acclaimed feature, “Murder By Numbers,” earlier this year.

Though similar in appearance, Not Just a Number goes well beyond merely pinning crime stats on a city grid. It holds a magnifying glass over each anonymous coordinate on Oakland’s crowded murder map (112 thus far in 2007), enabling an intimate interactivity among the family, friends and loved ones of each murder victim. Behind each number lies a hub for mourners to exchange stories, photos, music and anything else to bring the victim out from behind a mug shot and a police report.

The project won Katy, Sean and the Tribune the Knight Award for Public Service, “honoring digital journalism that produces compelling coverage of a vital issue and engages a geographic community.”

OJR swapped emails with the producers to find out how a grassroots community project became an award-winning model for in-depth Web reporting and digital public service.

OJR: Could you briefly walk us through the genesis of Not Just A Number? Was there some specific job in your professional Web-production lives that sparked the idea?

KN: Sean and I are married. At that time, Sean was a full-time photographer at The Trib. He was having to go and take photos of the homicides and when he got home we would talk about it. We found ourselves counting off the homicides “number 65 happened today”…”now we are at 75″ — that shocked us. We were forgetting that these victims were not just numbers but human beings. The initial goal was simply to find the families and learn more about the victims to help desensitize the issue of violence. The Tribune had done a homicide map every year in the paper, but there had never been anything done for online. We felt including statements from the families and friends of the victims would be really powerful and interactive was a great tool for telling the story.

SC: We brought our initial idea to Kathleen Kirkwood, Associate Editor for Online News. She was very supportive — basically said I love it go for it. She also suggested we contact a woman named Marilyn Washington Harris who runs the Khadafy Foundation. Her son Khadafy Washington had been killed in 2000. Marilyn now volunteers her time to help other families through the process of losing a loved one to violence. She is amazing.

KN: She met Sean and I at her “unofficial” office a local funeral home. We told her the idea and asked for her help contacting the families. She was interested but a little skeptical at first. She was concerned about our intentions and how the families and the victims would be presented. She told us that in many ways the survivors of the violence felt betrayed by the media. They were concerned with the use of police mug shots as identification of the victim. We got this a lot from others in the community as well. Here is a letter received from a reader on the issue of using police mug shots for id’ing murder victims:

“Mug shots scream GUILTY and that is a verdict the courts decided without taking into consideration what issues were occurring before, during and after his release from jail. My brother’s journey started way before he was in the system. When my father beat my mother in front of us… and he learned there was no consequence for that, it started. When we experienced our first police raid in my grandmother’s apartment, though there were no drugs found, the journey started. When he/we first had to identify ourselves as ‘homeless’ after my grandmother’s passing, we knew what options were left for Mar to choose from. And there are no photos of those times and no reporters recording those stats.”

That meeting with Marilyn was critical because hearing her concerns echoed this nagging feeling of a general desensitization and need to approach the story from a new direction.

SC: About that time, also met with Jane Ellen Stevens who co-wrote “Reporting on Violence – A Handbook for Journalists” and is also a journalism professor at UC-Berkeley. She helped us look at violence from a health perspective and not judicial.

As the project began picking up more speed, we started interviewing families and meeting more community members and we would always ask them what would they like to see be included in the project or how could we report on violence better.

Everyone wanted ‘Solutions’ — what can they do, how can the public get involved. We took their responses to heart and created areas on our site to address their issues.

Side note, Oakland is a town of organizers, historically. Huge civil rights changes have come from this city and not too long ago. People remember, and you feel that history when you go out and talk to people. Oakland is an amazing place and in the end, this project became a result of so many people in that community. I love that about it.

OJR: How long did the whole thing take to develop and launch?

SC: The idea, which Katy talks about in the previous question, started percolating around August of 2006. We started designing the site in September and I guess by mid-October I began to build and program the site. All the while, I was still working full-time as a staff photographer at the Tribune and Katy and I were also out there collecting content for the site. So it was a very interesting juggling act that we had to do. We did get a lot of support from several people in the newsroom who gave us the time and support to able to create it. Finally, the site launched on March 4th, 2007 to coincide with a homicide package that the Tribune runs every year.

OJR: What was the initial blueprint for the site, and what was the Tribune’s reaction when you pitched the idea?

KN & SC: We first just wanted to do an interactive homicide map with maybe a message board. Then after meeting various people in the community it grew to what it is now. The Tribune was very excited about the idea when we pitched them the idea. We went in with a little flash prototype we made up and I think that helped convey the idea.

OJR: As producers, what is your day-to-day interaction with Tribune reporters and editors, and how much hands-on access do they have to the site itself?

SC: We are very open to anyone in the newsroom to come to us with ideas. We also go to them when we find they are working on a story that would fit our site. We basically maintain the site right now but will eventually be shifting the responsibilities to other editors and even reporters if appropriate. Those responsibilities would be updating the data and posting new stories.

The site was created so that reporters or editors who weren’t necessarily comfortable with flash could easily update the site. Basically, there is a series of forms for each section of the site. The reporter can open the forms and input the new data, which then updates the site.

OJR: The “Features and Stories” section houses a pretty comprehensive mix of articles, videos and interactive one-off sites. How often is that updated, and what does content management entail?

KN: Usually, there are a couple of new stories added each month. Unfortunately, when the site was launched the paper went through a big shift. The Trib joined with The Contra Costa Times and The San Jose Mercury News under The Bay Area News Group — people had other things to focus on. Things have settled and people have more time to do multimedia and special features. It’s actually really exciting how the reporters have responded to the project. A lot of that credit goes out to Kathleen Kirkwood, who is awesome about recruiting reporters stories for the NJN.

OJR: How about the “Stories by You” section? Do family members and friends of victims come forward with those, or does that require some solicitation on your part?

KN & SC: The idea for this component of the site came about while researching the story, we discovered there were many after-school programs teaching youth new journalism tools, mostly video and audio pod casts. Oakland youth are so impacted by the violence, they were already reporting their own stories about this issue. We were impressed with the videos we saw, so we thought it would be great to showcase the work on the site — that’s how the community voices page developed.

Joe Weiss of SoundSlides, generously donated copies of his program to us and we handed them out to some of these organizations. We have had a few people send us content but for the most part ithas been slow. You really need a person that can go out consistently to solicit material, and the Trib just doesn’t have the staff for that. But, we haven’t given up. We are trying to develop other ways to help people in the community tell their own stories. CBC Canada’s “This I Believe” and the use of mobile phones in the interactive project MurMur are totally inspiring for us and we hope to co-op some of those ideas.

OJR: Any sense of how much residents in the heavier-homicide zones are interacting with the site?

KN & SC: Without having much to back this up except personal responses we get, we feel it is mainly the residents from the flat lands (crime rich areas) are the ones who are using our site, they are the ones most directly effected by violence and therefore have more interest in crime related stories especially ones that tell stories of hope or solutions. For example, we have been asked by many schools in the flat lands to come speak to their class because they have been using it as a tool in the class, we have yet been asked by a school in an area where violence is not a common thing.

OJR: What is next for the site? Any significant new features on deck?

KN: We are currently reworking the “Risk Factors” section of the site. While Kathleen Kirkwood was working with the Alameda County Health to gather the information on the risk factors, they encouraged her to also look at the resilience factors — the factors that help young people thrive despite living in potential harmful environments. We all loved this idea, but there wasn’t time to explore it before the launch.

Working with several community centers in Oakland, we recently had the opportunity to conduct video interviews with youth talking about what has helped them and their peers thrive despite some of the obstacles they face. It was one of the best experiences we had doing this project. The component launches at the end of the month so please check it out.

SC: I think for us the next step would be find ways to connect to low-income residents who may not have a computer. We think one way would be enabling interaction to our site with a cell phone. Also, finding funding to put kiosks in public libraries would be nice as well. As far as new features, not much except the resilience feature that Katy mentions, and maybe give the site a little makeover.

OJR: Finally, what advice would you offer online journalists at other news organizations who wanted to create a project with similar impact?

SC: I would say first of all not to be afraid to fail. The whole time we were creating this project we kept telling everyone that we could do this but there were a lot of times Katy and I had no idea what we were doing. It was a big leap for us. Other tips would be to talk to as many people as you can about the idea to help flush it out. Get out of the newsroom and into the community. As far as building the project, we benefited greatly from so many people out there sharing their expertise online. It is truly amazing, the generosity of the web programming world.

KN: Rough out your concept—how you think the story should be told—then go out and meet with organizations and individuals working in the community. Listen to their struggles and the stories they would like to learn about. Find out what information/tools they could use. Then go for it!

KN & SC: We would recommend groups with limited resources take a look at online services and open source software that could help streamline the process, such as:

  • Vuvox
  • Elgg
  • Javascript & PHP libraries like CakePHP & JQuery
  • Content Managment System or frameworks like WordPress, Drupal, Django, etc…
  • Web services with API’s like Yahoo Maps, Zoho, Picnik, etc…