5 lessons learned: Improving civic engagement through a local news site

Four years ago a team of communication scholars, researchers and journalists set out to create a community news website that would increase civic engagement and cross ethnic barriers in a predominantly Asian and Latino immigrant city. Since Alhambra Source launched in 2010, it has grown to more than 60 community contributors who speak 10 languages and range in age from high school students to retirees. Their stories have helped shape local policy and contributed to a more engaged citizenry within a diverse community. Below are five lessons we’ve learned about creating a community news website that fosters civic engagement.

1. Investigate your community’s news and information needs before you launch.
While few news organizations are likely to have a dedicated team of researchers and scholars at their disposal, they can — and should — identify community information needs to guide the development of their site. On the simplest level, that means a reporter should know his or her beat well and do some investigating before launch.

As a journalist in Alhambra, for example, I witnessed firsthand the civic participation gaps and the barriers between ethnic and linguistic groups that our researchers had identified. The lack of civic participation was made evident in 2010 when five incumbents ran unchallenged, prompting officials to cancel the elections.

The need to cross language lines became clear when school and government officials, police officers and other community leaders all told me that they could not understand the most active press coverage of Alhambra: the Chinese-language newspapers. These newspapers target about a third of the city’s population, and yet city leaders had no idea what was being reported. Identifying basic communication needs such as these can help define the goals of a local news source and also establish a baseline that can later be used to demonstrate the site’s impact to funders or other supporters.

2. To effectively build a community contributor team, hold regular meetings, play to contributor strengths, and remember they are volunteers.
We work with community contributors — in our case that means Alhambra residents who volunteer and tend not to have professional journalism experience. Initially, I set about recruiting Alhambrans to report stories that might interest them or their neighbors. I searched for people already producing content online, talked to leaders of community organizations, and spread the word about our new site. Once we launched the site, we featured our contributors prominently with a call for others to get involved.

Monthly meetings in our office space have been crucial to the strength and expansion of our team. They are part newsroom story meeting, part community advocacy, and part social gathering (we always include a potluck dinner). After the first few meetings and the site launch, I no longer had to actively recruit contributors — at least one new candidate would contact me each month. As our reputation grows, so has our team. That doesn’t mean everyone sticks around: like any volunteer community, we have to work to keep people engaged and interested in giving their time. But enough new people come to keep up the site’s content and energy, while a regular base of contributors provide a core continuum.

3. When it comes to community contributions, a personal perspective is often crucial to a story.
Community contributors often want to report because they have an agenda they want heard. Obscuring that under a veil of objectivity just does not work on a community level. I’ve found community contributors are great for insight stories and features, sometimes providing our most creative articles, ranging from a critique of the local food rating system (“A=American, B=Better, C=Chinese”) to a call for new bike laws to a visit to the local psychic “Mrs. Lin.”

One story type that I have found community contributors can consistently produce better than outside reporters is a first-person piece incorporating a wider perspective. The stories that have received some of the highest traffic on our site and met our research metrics of increased civic engagement have tended to be of this type. Some examples include a story on the challenges of inter-generational communication for a child of immigrants, one about growing up Arab or Muslim in a mostly Asian and Latino community, and one about why a church community organizer takes issue with a city ordinance.

Finally—and this is important—keep in mind that these are not professional reporters. Everyone needs an editor, and working with community contributors often means multiple drafts and intensive fact checking. Many times it would have been easier for me to have done the story myself, so it is important to match volunteer reporters with pieces to which they can add value.

4. Crossing language and ethnic divides cannot be achieved through multilingual content alone.
Before we launched, we intended to be a site in the three languages most spoken by our readers — English, Chinese, and Spanish. We quickly discovered that we lacked the resources. And as it turns out, such a plan might not have been worth the effort.

About a quarter of Alhambra residents live in households where no adults speak fluent English. There is a clear need for foreign language media, particularly in the ethnic Chinese community. But that does not mean that the community would be interested if we created a multilingual website. From anecdotal interviewing, we found that these residents are satisfied getting their news from ethnic publications and are less likely to go to a website.

Instead, we found many other important ways to bridge the language divide. Here are four:

  • Building a multilingual team, which helps expand the range of stories we can cover and the types of people we can interview
  • Translating local foreign-language coverage into English
  • Translating selections of our own original content into Spanish and Chinese (through two means: high-quality human translations for select articles and Google Translate function across the entire site)
  • Establishing relationships with ethnic press so they print versions of our articles in their newspapers.

5. Use feedback loops as engagement and learning tools.
We use polls and surveys extensively on the site to engage residents, create a link between them and city officials, and improve our coverage. Some of our most successful surveys have ranged from where to find the best local burger or boba to whether the city should ban fireworks sales to which supermarket should come to Main Street.

We often incorporate the findings from these informal polls into stories. It enables more residents to participate on the site in a simpler way than writing a story, and in public policy issues, it offers a means for us to share community feedback with the government. For example, when the city council recently acted to limit pay-for-recycling, less than a handful of people from the public came to the meeting (like most days). But on our site more than 100 people voted to express their opinions, the vast majority against the ban. The city council then decided to grant a reprieve to one market.

We also use the polls to gauge our impact and to see on which topics residents would like more coverage. We have surveyed residents about what stories they would like to see, research questions they would like answered, and even improvements we could make to our website. Engaging the community this way enables us to better respond to their needs. After all, a community news site, like a city itself, is a work in progress.

Alhambra Source is the pilot project of a new Civic Engagement and Journalism Initiative at USC Annenberg. The project aims to link Communication research and Journalism to engage diverse, under-served Los Angeles communities. The Metamorphosis Project is the primary researcher, and Intersections South LA is another project site. This is the first in a series of articles on the topic of creating and evaluating local news websites that strive to increase civic engagement.

The case for independent news sites as profit-makers: 'I think there's a great business model here'

After my recent stories on the state of independent news sites, several folks called or e-mailed to say I was barking up the wrong tree by focusing on nonprofits like MinnPost and the Voice of San Diego. The real future, they said, is with sites that are in it to make money. They may be right.

“I think there’s a great business model here,” said Merrill Brown, a media management and strategy consultant. “If you can get a quality product out there, local advertisers are looking for alternatives… I think there’s plenty of evidence of that.”

So far, of course, there’s little evidence that profitability will reliably follow. Even many operations that talk about being in the black do so with asterisks – the key players aren’t drawing a salary, or the site is subsidized with other lines of business, for example. Others argue nonprofits will be the winning models for robust public-service news sites. Only today, a seemingly promising startup in Seattle, Crosscut, announced it was transitioning from a for-profit site to nonprofit status.

But many people say it’s not surprising that profits are not there at this point in the innovation cycle, and point to the rapid growth of businesses trying to tease out local advertising dollars. The day of online profits is coming, they say, and for-profit news sites will be best positioned to thrive.

“We’re still at the very early stages of local advertising on the Web,” said Jonathan Weber of Missoula, Mont., who runs a string of Western state websites under the name, New West.

Weber says the potential is already clear in the disparity between the time people are spending online and the amount of local advertising going into the Web. “You’ve got 6 to 8 percent of ad dollars online, but 25 percent of people’s media time is online,” he said. “I very much believe that gap has to close.”

By the volume of people calling him and asking for advice about starting online news operations, Weber can tell there’s wide interest in running community news sites. Some of the aspirants are former newspaper reporters and editors who took buyouts or lost jobs in newsroom downsizing efforts, and are hoping to find a new journalism life on the Web.

Weber tells them two basic things: First, making a go of a community news site on the Web is no picnic. (His own New West operation remains slightly shy of the break-even point after three years of operation.) Second, the long-term outlook is bright. “I think we’re at the front edge of this,” he said.

Brown said the potential of local advertising can be seen in the number of players stepping in at the national level to aggregate community event and hyper-local information. Sites like Yelp, Zvents and Eventful show the potential demand, he said.

Although these and other national players each take a slice from local advertising, Brown said the size of the pie is plenty big. “There’s lots of money in local advertising,” he said. “Advertisers are unhappy with newspapers; TV websites remain poor; and television is overpriced.” One key to success, Brown said, will be the adroit mining of vertical advertising categories like entertainment, fashion, real estate, the arts, etc., that are “revenue-friendly.”

With so much in flux – mainstream media in severe financial trouble and Web participation rising rapidly – it’s impossible (at least for me) to get a solid grip on the scope and dynamics of news-site development on the Web. Will national news aggregators like Ourtown or outside.in grab a strong foothold in communities across the country? Will national lifestyle networks like Glam.com take a big chunk of advertising dollars? Will the wide-scope offerings of a local newspaper be a sustainable model online? Or will a multitude of niche sites – local sports, local politics, local schools, local traffic – be the winning model?

At a minimum, it would seem we’ve entered a period of intense startup fever, with expectations growing that the marketplace is ready (or almost ready) to support Web operations that combine hometown information and advertising.

Peter Krasilovsky, a digital media consultant and blogger, says the entry point for any community news startup has to be the advertiser. Too many website entrepreneurs are still thinking in terms of the newspaper model — assembling a potluck of community news and trusting that advertisers will naturally follow, he said. “That’s a kind of longing for the old ways,” he said.

Successful startups, he said, will begin with the question of what local small businesses need to be successful. One answer may well be advertising on a local news site, but there are likely to be many other answers, and Web entrepreneurs need to be prepared to provide them, even if it’s at odds with their initial mission. “You’re never going to have a successful business until you focus on the advertisers,” said Krasilovsky.

James Macpherson, who runs the Pasadena Now site, is following this strategy, aiming to serve as Internet and e-commerce consultant for Main Street merchants in Pasadena. But all advise that people who get in the game now will need to prepare for some lean (at best) early years.

Like Weber, Macpherson hasn’t yet turned a profit. And Weber gets close to the break-even point by having sideline businesses like hosting conferences on the Western state issues of growth and change, and a small indoor advertising operation.

“There’s going to be a business there,” said Krasilovsky. “But think of it this way. People are going to have to get accustomed to making $30,000 to $50,000 a year instead of $100,000 or $125,000.”

The state of independent local online news: Start-ups look for foundation support

[Editor's note: This the final article in OJR's week-long look at the state of independent local online news start-ups.If you missed the first five installments, here they are:
Part 1: Sites on the rise; business models remain elusive
Part 2: Experience makes MinnPost a top online new startup
Part 3: No paper? No problem! News companies use the Web to enter new markets
Part 4: Seeking consistency from grassroots reporting
Part 5: Outsourcing as a path to profitability?]

Can the nation’s network of private local foundations be rallied to the cause of nonprofit news on the Web? Even if they can, is there enough money there to make a difference in the developing world of local-news Internet startups?

The Knight Foundation, which has given $400 million in journalism grants over the last six decades, is trying to find out. And there are a few early signals that there’s at least some money to be had by journalists trying to make a local news splash on the Web.

The Voice of San Diego, the three-and-a-half-year-old community news site, recently won two grants from the San Diego Foundation – $25,000 to support the site’s own fundraising efforts and $40,000 to tell the stories of San Diego residents who overcame particular challenges to succeed in the community.

MinnPost, a Minneapolis site that celebrates its first birthday Nov. 9, recently won a $225,000 grant from the Minnesota-based Blandin Foundation to produce reporting on rural issues in Minnesota.

These are smallish examples against a backdrop of huge potential needs, as strapped mainstream media scale back reporting resources in their communities. Nevertheless, some Web startups are making the argument that local foundations ought to consider news and information as critical community needs along with traditional territory like the arts and health care.

“We’re getting a lot of attention from foundations,” Andrew Donohue, co-editor of the Voice of San Diego, told me in an interview at the Voice’s offices in San Diego. “They realize if they care about certain things in the community like science and environmental issues, there’s a real problem if there’s no way to get this information to the public. If there’s no journalist around to tell important stories, what do you do?”

With advertising dollars still scarce for Voice of San Diego and their counterparts across the country, the Knight Foundation is spending $24 million to test the theory that local foundations might take local journalism under their wings as a threatened community resource.

I talked by phone with Gary Kebbel, journalism program officer at the Knight Foundation and a digital pioneer in his own right.

“We’re trying to convince foundations that a core community need is not just health, education and welfare, but also information,” Kebbel told me.

Geoff Dougherty, editor and CEO of the ChiTown Daily News, says foundation involvement can’t happen fast enough. “I don’t think the philanthropic community has realized how rapidly local coverage has fallen apart in many urban areas, and how important that local coverage is to the health of democracy,” he said.

The foundation initiative is but one way Knight is aiming to prod innovation on meeting community information needs – premised mainly on the theory that big gaps are emerging in mainstream media’s reporting. Knight is handing out millions more to innovators eager to try out a new proposal. For example, it gave $250,000 to MinnPost and $340,000 to the ChiTown Daily News.

Last week, applications closed on a new round of Knight’s $5 million news challenge, aimed at community news startups.

I asked Kebbel how the Knight Foundation saw its role in digital transformation as it relates to news.

“We’re hoping to lead it,” he said. “We have the luxury of being the industry’s research and development arm, if the industry is smart enough to use it. And we have the luxury of testing things to see if some actually succeed.”

Note: In a future post, I plan to look at the digital innovation strategies of other major journalism funders like McCormick, Carnegie and MacArthur.

Q&A

Here’s more from my interview with Gary Kebbel:

Q. What’s your sense of how independent news sites are doing?

A. I can’t say I’ve studied the sites content-wise. What I can talk about is the fact that you’ve got individuals who have the tools to start sites, and they’re going ahead and doing it. And how long they can sustain it is sort of the big question. They get going on the fact that they can start for relatively cheap, and initially it’s sort of exciting. And then all of a sudden, six months into it, holy criminey, this is a lot of work. So the question is, in that year, have they gotten enough of an audience, have they gotten savvy enough to get advertisers? And also, I think, have they figured out who to partner with? There’s a decent enough amount of people willing to devote time and energy. Our New Voices project, our whole process is to fund startups, and see what startups work. One model is an association with a library, another is a partnership with a university. So who produces and who can make it sustainable? I think quite possibly the model that is going to have the longest staying power is the one associated with the universities.

Q. Does Knight have concerns about losing a place where the whole community comes together?

A. That’s a perfect question. I don’t think we’ve reached a place where we know the answer to that. As you know, the newspaper used to be sort of that place. As we look back on it, we probably thought it was more that place than it really was. Sorry to say. But in the new model, is that place radio or TV? And I think it might be.

Q. Is that because the economics are drifting in that direction?

A. I’d say ease of use. Much as I hate it, people don’t seem to be taking the time or effort to read newspapers the way they use to. But they’re certainly willing to listen to radio on the drive to work or TV, and watch TV in the evening. So the question is, how much of that is local news? I mention radio and TV in part because it’s the structure in place to reach a mass audience immediately, and to overcome literacy issues.

Q. What is the Knight Foundation’s role in digital transformation as it relates to news?

A. We’re hoping to lead it. We’re hoping others see it that it way. We’re doing it through funding principally through the Knight News Challenge, which funds digital innovation and experimentation. We have the luxury of being the industry’s research and development arm, if the industry is smart enough to use it. And we have the luxury of testing things and seeing if some actually succeed.

Q. Joel Kramer of MinnPost told me foundation support will only be there in the startup phase and will disappear after a short amount of time. Is that how you see it?

A. That’s fair. We look more and more at what we do as startup funding. That doesn’t mean we don’t give additional funding. But people really should not come to expect it. And they should not build their sustainability plan on the fact that when the money runs out they can go back to Knight Foundation for more.

Q. Can nonprofit news sites expect to build a member contributor base?

A. I really don’t know. I do think we’re at the stage where more and more sites are experimenting with more and more ways to charge. And I think the public is getting used to paying for some things. If the content is good enough, special enough, speaks to them enough, perhaps micro-payments will be part of the answer, perhaps memberships might be part of the answer. I don’t think any of these will be THE answer.

Q. Tell me about other Knight programs.

A. What we’re doing right now is trying to serve the information needs for communities in a democracy. And overall, we’re trying to increase the information flows in communities, and increase the quality. The News Challenge is No. 1. Another is the Knight Commission on the Information Needs of Communities in a Democracy. Another leg is trying to get universal access in the 26 Knight communities – wi-fi or wired or whatever. Then there’s the Community Information Challenge. That’s an initiative to pair up startup innovators with local foundations. We’re trying to convince foundations that a core need is not just health, education and welfare, but also information. The business model is the $64,000 question, and nobody has the answer yet. That’s why the Knight Foundation is doing all these experiments.

David Westphal is executive in residence at the USC Annenberg School for Communication. He is affiliated with Annenberg’s Center for Communication Leadership and the Knight Digital Media Center.