<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The business model for news is and always has been broken and Rupert Murdoch can&#039;t fix it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ojr.org/the-business-model-for-news-is-and-always-has-been-broken-and-rupert-murdoch-cant-fix-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ojr.org/the-business-model-for-news-is-and-always-has-been-broken-and-rupert-murdoch-cant-fix-it/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-business-model-for-news-is-and-always-has-been-broken-and-rupert-murdoch-cant-fix-it</link>
	<description>Focusing on the future of digital journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 15:02:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 114.96.36.197</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/the-business-model-for-news-is-and-always-has-been-broken-and-rupert-murdoch-cant-fix-it/#comment-2170</link>
		<dc:creator>114.96.36.197</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1808#comment-2170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a sense, I don&#039;t agree with what Rupert Murdoch have said any more, there is no doubt that the consumers must pay for the news after enjoying the service, if they don&#039;t, who will?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a sense, I don&#8217;t agree with what Rupert Murdoch have said any more, there is no doubt that the consumers must pay for the news after enjoying the service, if they don&#8217;t, who will?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Gin</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/the-business-model-for-news-is-and-always-has-been-broken-and-rupert-murdoch-cant-fix-it/#comment-2169</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Gin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 07:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1808#comment-2169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Murdoch is saying nothing that we dont alrady know. Many forms of content are going the way of the internet; its faster, easier, it can be updated quicker, and in many businesses it streamlines enterprises allowing it to reduce its costs.
teevme]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murdoch is saying nothing that we dont alrady know. Many forms of content are going the way of the internet; its faster, easier, it can be updated quicker, and in many businesses it streamlines enterprises allowing it to reduce its costs.<br />
teevme</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 187.132.145.238</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/the-business-model-for-news-is-and-always-has-been-broken-and-rupert-murdoch-cant-fix-it/#comment-2168</link>
		<dc:creator>187.132.145.238</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 17:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1808#comment-2168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unlike a lot of whiners who don`t accept what]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlike a lot of whiners who don`t accept what</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Sinfield</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/the-business-model-for-news-is-and-always-has-been-broken-and-rupert-murdoch-cant-fix-it/#comment-2167</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Sinfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 03:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1808#comment-2167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really cannot see a large number of people paying for general news. If it is specialised advice or recommendations. However, with the amount of news websites available, why would a person pay for one website when they can get the news for free elsewhere?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really cannot see a large number of people paying for general news. If it is specialised advice or recommendations. However, with the amount of news websites available, why would a person pay for one website when they can get the news for free elsewhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Weaver</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/the-business-model-for-news-is-and-always-has-been-broken-and-rupert-murdoch-cant-fix-it/#comment-2166</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Weaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 12:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1808#comment-2166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess you don&#039;t believe Murdoch means it when he says people will pay *if* :we give them something of good and useful value.&quot;

If you stipulate that, your post makes no sense, does it? You arguing that his plan won&#039;t work because he isn&#039;t offering something of value. Then you contradict that with WSJ example.

Why not just say &quot;online users won&#039;t pay for commodity news&quot;? Pretty much everybody understands that. Shouldn&#039;t the debate be about whether we can create products and services around news that the will pay for?

The alternative, it seems to me, is that there is nothing at all about news that people will pay for. That hasn&#039;t been tested, much less proved.

http://editor.blogspot.com/2009/12/revenue-for-news-what-if-were-asking_12.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess you don&#8217;t believe Murdoch means it when he says people will pay *if* :we give them something of good and useful value.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you stipulate that, your post makes no sense, does it? You arguing that his plan won&#8217;t work because he isn&#8217;t offering something of value. Then you contradict that with WSJ example.</p>
<p>Why not just say &#8220;online users won&#8217;t pay for commodity news&#8221;? Pretty much everybody understands that. Shouldn&#8217;t the debate be about whether we can create products and services around news that the will pay for?</p>
<p>The alternative, it seems to me, is that there is nothing at all about news that people will pay for. That hasn&#8217;t been tested, much less proved.</p>
<p><a href="http://editor.blogspot.com/2009/12/revenue-for-news-what-if-were-asking_12.html" rel="nofollow">http://editor.blogspot.com/2009/12/revenue-for-news-what-if-were-asking_12.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 173.64.53.215</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/the-business-model-for-news-is-and-always-has-been-broken-and-rupert-murdoch-cant-fix-it/#comment-2165</link>
		<dc:creator>173.64.53.215</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=1808#comment-2165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The full Lippmann quote can be read here:

http://www.howardowens.com/content/walter-lippmann-free-press]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The full Lippmann quote can be read here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.howardowens.com/content/walter-lippmann-free-press" rel="nofollow">http://www.howardowens.com/content/walter-lippmann-free-press</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>