<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will NPR&#039;s podcasts birth a new business model for public radio?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ojr.org/will-nprs-podcasts-birth-a-new-business-model-for-public-radio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ojr.org/will-nprs-podcasts-birth-a-new-business-model-for-public-radio/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=will-nprs-podcasts-birth-a-new-business-model-for-public-radio</link>
	<description>Focusing on the future of digital journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 15:02:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/will-nprs-podcasts-birth-a-new-business-model-for-public-radio/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 07:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=916#comment-418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sure the affiliates have a lot to do with NPR&#039;s decision making - it&#039;s reasonable.  They&#039;re going to have to get together and do some experimenting.  The highlight reel model is not sustainable in the long term.  That&#039;s what network news is and we have come expect better quality and more in depth coverage from NPR.  Indeed, that is why listeners choose NPR over other outlets and why I&#039;m demanding more from their podcasts.

With respect to length, breaking up the shows into their story constituents is especially well suited for the podcasting medium.  If I were to &quot;download&quot; all of Morning Edition to my iPod, it could be downloaded as a series of files from which I could simply advance to the next story if one didn&#039;t tickle my fancy.  Indeed, as much as I love to listen to Diane Rehm, there are often times I long for a &quot;Next Story&quot; button. :-)

I certainly want to support my local affiliate, WBAA, but they really make it hard on their digital listeners.  They only provide Windows format streaming - I don&#039;t do Windows - and no podcasts.  I often travel to Chicago where their signal does not reach and Chicago&#039;s affiliates broadcast different shows at different times.  Thus, I can&#039;t listen to a continuous show.  Podcasting would solve this traveling problem handily.

Indeed, I would be willing to pay a modest subscription fee to get this service.  The fee could be split between NPR and member affiliate based on my zip code.  That way WBAA, gets a piece of the action, and everyone is happy.

There are solutions here - NPR and its affiliates are going to have to get together and more effectively address this new technology.  Disruptive technology, such as podcasting, is good for the public and the industry. Shaking up the status quo is necessary from time to time.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure the affiliates have a lot to do with NPR&#8217;s decision making &#8211; it&#8217;s reasonable.  They&#8217;re going to have to get together and do some experimenting.  The highlight reel model is not sustainable in the long term.  That&#8217;s what network news is and we have come expect better quality and more in depth coverage from NPR.  Indeed, that is why listeners choose NPR over other outlets and why I&#8217;m demanding more from their podcasts.</p>
<p>With respect to length, breaking up the shows into their story constituents is especially well suited for the podcasting medium.  If I were to &#8220;download&#8221; all of Morning Edition to my iPod, it could be downloaded as a series of files from which I could simply advance to the next story if one didn&#8217;t tickle my fancy.  Indeed, as much as I love to listen to Diane Rehm, there are often times I long for a &#8220;Next Story&#8221; button. <img src='http://www.ojr.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I certainly want to support my local affiliate, WBAA, but they really make it hard on their digital listeners.  They only provide Windows format streaming &#8211; I don&#8217;t do Windows &#8211; and no podcasts.  I often travel to Chicago where their signal does not reach and Chicago&#8217;s affiliates broadcast different shows at different times.  Thus, I can&#8217;t listen to a continuous show.  Podcasting would solve this traveling problem handily.</p>
<p>Indeed, I would be willing to pay a modest subscription fee to get this service.  The fee could be split between NPR and member affiliate based on my zip code.  That way WBAA, gets a piece of the action, and everyone is happy.</p>
<p>There are solutions here &#8211; NPR and its affiliates are going to have to get together and more effectively address this new technology.  Disruptive technology, such as podcasting, is good for the public and the industry. Shaking up the status quo is necessary from time to time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Koon</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/will-nprs-podcasts-birth-a-new-business-model-for-public-radio/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Koon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 19:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=916#comment-417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark, your OJR column will be missed but best of luck on your book. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, your OJR column will be missed but best of luck on your book. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/will-nprs-podcasts-birth-a-new-business-model-for-public-radio/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=916#comment-416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NPR doesn&#039;t make its flagship shows available via podcast.  Why not?  They have them in Windows Media Format and RealPlayer format (10% of the market) while the underlying MP3 format addresses 100% of the market and can be podcasted.  They force you to travel their site and download and use third party software to play them.  Podcasting would make this a snap for the public - yet NPR steadfastly refuses to deliver what is being demanded by their listeners.

If there was ever content that is ideal for podcasting, the NPR flagship shows are it - Morning Edition, All Things Considered, Diane Rehm, Marketplace, etc.  I&#039;d dealy love to download these shows to my iPod and walk off with them to listen to at my convenience.  Ms. Thomas is dead wrong on the lack of demand.  She&#039;s welcome to email me - I&#039;ll provide her with a number of scenarios where full show podcasts downloads would answer a consumer demand out here in the midwest.

Also, NPR provides excerpts of their shows.  Why not the whole show?  I can get the whole of Meet The Press, ABC&#039;s This Week, and PBS&#039;s Washtington Week as podcasts.  CBS is following NPR&#039;s model and offering excerpts of 60 Minutes - I no longer subscribe to them.  It&#039;s easy to skip ahead when a story you don&#039;t want comes on.  However, you can&#039;t restore missing content when you&#039;re only given an excerpt or highlight reel.  NPR and CBS just don&#039;t understand the medium.

The real story is that NPR is following Hollywood&#039;s model of being very hesitant at providing their content to the public in the most popular format.  What&#039;s their reason?  It&#039;s not like you can rerun news and get more advertising revenue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NPR doesn&#8217;t make its flagship shows available via podcast.  Why not?  They have them in Windows Media Format and RealPlayer format (10% of the market) while the underlying MP3 format addresses 100% of the market and can be podcasted.  They force you to travel their site and download and use third party software to play them.  Podcasting would make this a snap for the public &#8211; yet NPR steadfastly refuses to deliver what is being demanded by their listeners.</p>
<p>If there was ever content that is ideal for podcasting, the NPR flagship shows are it &#8211; Morning Edition, All Things Considered, Diane Rehm, Marketplace, etc.  I&#8217;d dealy love to download these shows to my iPod and walk off with them to listen to at my convenience.  Ms. Thomas is dead wrong on the lack of demand.  She&#8217;s welcome to email me &#8211; I&#8217;ll provide her with a number of scenarios where full show podcasts downloads would answer a consumer demand out here in the midwest.</p>
<p>Also, NPR provides excerpts of their shows.  Why not the whole show?  I can get the whole of Meet The Press, ABC&#8217;s This Week, and PBS&#8217;s Washtington Week as podcasts.  CBS is following NPR&#8217;s model and offering excerpts of 60 Minutes &#8211; I no longer subscribe to them.  It&#8217;s easy to skip ahead when a story you don&#8217;t want comes on.  However, you can&#8217;t restore missing content when you&#8217;re only given an excerpt or highlight reel.  NPR and CBS just don&#8217;t understand the medium.</p>
<p>The real story is that NPR is following Hollywood&#8217;s model of being very hesitant at providing their content to the public in the most popular format.  What&#8217;s their reason?  It&#8217;s not like you can rerun news and get more advertising revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Glaser</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/will-nprs-podcasts-birth-a-new-business-model-for-public-radio/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Glaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=916#comment-415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You guys are too kind! I really appreciate your thoughts, and look forward to your support in future endeavors, wherever they may lead me...
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are too kind! I really appreciate your thoughts, and look forward to your support in future endeavors, wherever they may lead me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Stovall</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/will-nprs-podcasts-birth-a-new-business-model-for-public-radio/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Stovall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 07:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=916#comment-414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I, too, am very sorry to read that your byline will disappear from OJR. Your work has always been thoughtful, forward-looking and consistently information-rich. I wish you the very best and will be watching closely for your new project.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, am very sorry to read that your byline will disappear from OJR. Your work has always been thoughtful, forward-looking and consistently information-rich. I wish you the very best and will be watching closely for your new project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. D. Lasica</title>
		<link>http://www.ojr.org/will-nprs-podcasts-birth-a-new-business-model-for-public-radio/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>J. D. Lasica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 01:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ojr.org/?p=916#comment-413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do I think? I think that Mark Glaser will be much missed at OJR and (in the immediate future) in the online journalism world. Good luck with your new ventures, Mark!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do I think? I think that Mark Glaser will be much missed at OJR and (in the immediate future) in the online journalism world. Good luck with your new ventures, Mark!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>